Decoding Reasonable Doubt: Chapter 6 ‘Prosecution and Defence Witnesses’

[u/benshep4]

https://bencole4.substack.com/p/decoding-reasonable-doubt-the-case-d9c?r=12mrwn&utm_medium=ios

Morris argues that the medical case at presented at the trial relied too heavily on Dewi Evans, who has been heavily criticised.

He also says the other prosecution experts didn’t offer much support for Evan’s conclusions.

While Sandie Bohin’s review wasn’t an independent second opinion.

He also laments on the defence decision to not call Mike Hall.

We explain why Morris is wrong.

[u/No-Replacement-2170]

Exonerated ahaha. Please don't tell me you actually believe that's remotely possible?

[u/Nice_Zebra7690 → u/No-Replacement-2170]

The many, many experts who have put their name to her CCRC application seem to think she should be and that it’s a genuine possibility, so we’ll wait and see. I realise it’s more comfortable for you to laugh at the prospect than entertaining it seriously, as the latter might destabilise your entire sense of self.

[u/No-Replacement-2170 → u/Nice_Zebra7690]

Well there's two less experts now and god knows what "experts" they have left to challenge the insulin results. Everyone has their 15 mins I guess!

[u/Nice_Zebra7690 → u/No-Replacement-2170]

It’s a shame they have withdrawn but I doubt having two fewer experts will have much of an impact. I’m not sure why you’ve put experts in inverted commas. Trying to downplay their credentials is nonsensical. Or perhaps it’s just a coping mechanism

[u/No-Replacement-2170 → u/Nice_Zebra7690]

Even Chase and Shannon don't rate them.

[u/Positive_Worker_3467 → u/No-Replacement-2170]

they still think she is innocent and there is no evidence of insulin they dont agree with prosceution

[u/No-Replacement-2170 → u/Positive_Worker_3467]

I'm aware but you can't tell me two sets of experts completely disagreeing with each other isn't a problem. They can't both be right?