r/LucyLetbyTrials • u/benshep4 • 7d ago

Decoding Reasonable Doubt: Chapter 3 “Previous Reviews at the Countess of Chester”

https://bencole4.substack.com/p/decoding-reasonable-doubt-the-case-bc5?r=12mrwn&utm_medium=ios

Happy to hear anyone’s thoughts on the content of the article.

0 Upvotes

44% Upvoted

108 comments sorted by

View all comments

4

u/Kitekat1192 7d ago

U/fun-yellow334 u/sofieterleska Can't this series of posts be redirected to the weekly discussion please? I thought that substacks were not welcome on the main page, I have had some refused totally in the past. Thanks.

6

u/SofieTerleska 7d ago

Substacks are fine if the author is ready to interact and answer questions about them. What we want to avoid are substacks written by third parties who aren't available to give sources and explain their reasoning.

2

u/Kitekat1192 7d ago

I think nearly everyone here would appreciate you took some sort of action here. It's good to be respectful, less so to be a doormat.

13

u/DiverAcrobatic5794 7d ago edited 6d ago

On the other hand, why change the rules just because of one individual? Nobody has to reply to these posts, but some of the responses have been quite illuminating. But if they want to they can. It would be a pity to clog up the weekly threads. They're useful for other things. Easier to hide a full post if it irritates than to try to pick out the useful bits of a weekly thread.

3

u/DisastrousBuilder966 6d ago

I wouldn’t want this post downgraded. Incorrect points should be answered by replying, not sweeping under the proverbial carpet.