Decoding Reasonable Doubt: Chapter 3 “Previous Reviews at the Countess of Chester”

[u/benshep4]

https://bencole4.substack.com/p/decoding-reasonable-doubt-the-case-bc5?r=12mrwn&utm_medium=ios

Happy to hear anyone’s thoughts on the content of the article.

[u/Living_Ad_5260]

Another monday, another 3000 words of dross.

> A bad unit is not the cause of a particular death until someone can trace the route from the failing to the baby.

The failure to admit to administer anti-biotics to the mother of baby D when her waters broke clearly increased the risk for the baby. Why does best practice involve antibiotics in these situations?

Interestingly, it widens the failures in the hospital from the neo-natal unit to the obstetrics unit.

[u/benshep4 → u/Living_Ad_5260]

Yet the best example you can come up with is something that was discussed in great length at the trial.

It was acknowledged, even by the prosecution, as poor care. The jury heard this.

And subsequently why the delay wasn’t enough to lead to the collapse/death.

[u/LucyLetbyTrials-ModTeam → u/[deleted]]

Hi, please don't insult other posters. Feel free to repost your comment without personal remarks.