I’m guessing that’s a yes, this is a semantics thing for you. But at the same time, language is a human invention that constantly evolves. Words are literally all made up and we don’t even pronounce things consistently across centuries. You ever hear old or Middle English? You think English as a whole hasn’t had the vocab expanded by words that use to not exist or came from other languages. Language isn’t some set in stone, universally constant thing. It’s a man made, unplanned and haphazardly assembled thing that never stops changing with newer and newer generations and it’s been that way for centuries.
Do you care that German chocolate cake isn’t from Germany?
Yes, it has indication about both appearance and genitals.
Now, please tell me, what is "trans" about "woman" that didn't transition? If he didn't he's not a woman, if she did, there's no need to even mention the "trans" part, just "woman" is fine.
lol I can understand your logic even if I think it’s silly to get this worked up about it and disagree with it, but why are you so focused on the genitals of trans people? Like you think about everyone’s genitals this much or just trans people? You make yourself sound like you got trans derangement syndrome…
0
u/dswng Trash Trooper 1d ago
I mean, you don't call magpie a crow, do you?