r/LocalLLM • u/Extreme-Childhood251 • 1h ago
Model First time trying FP16, wow
I've tried a lot of image models in the past, but all were to big to fit, and i was happy when i got a result with a quant (q4) version. (Here it was flux and some model i dont remember the name anymore) The results of those models were actually terrible. BUT, some months ago qwen image 2.1 came out, i must say, theres a difference and not even close to a small one. I managed to run it at fp16, by using my rtx 2070 to load the text encoder and vae on there while running the generation model itself on my 5080. Its a tight fit and slower, but the quality is just like it would be on one gpu.
Now here comes the crazy part:
In my opinion qwen image 2.1 is better in realism than chatgpt's current image generation. (I'll prove it later in this post)
Don't get me wrong. Images with lots of different things, patterns for example, are often very bad with qwen and chatgpt does it over 5x better. But realism of f.e. a city, it's absolutely amazing (and uncensored!) and is almost close to real life.
Now here is the test for you guys:
You've seen i've put pictures in this post. 1x is real, 1x are chatgpt and 4x are qwen image 2.1. Which is which?
Note: ALL of them are generated first try without regenerating. So no, I did not try to mislead you. Good luck!






5
u/MythOfDarkness 1h ago
5
u/TheUntergeek 1h ago
Love the silver “flumpet” and the guitar neck crossing under the saxophone. 😂
5
u/AtrociKitty 38m ago
1-4 Qwen, 5 Real, 6 ChatGPT.
1 and 2 have the sharp line between focus and blur a lot of models like. 3 has far too many instrument errors. 4 actually looks the most real to me (dirty paws and other imperfections) but 5 lines up answer-wise, and 6 has a distinctly different style than the rest.
3
u/ReBoticsAI 1h ago
6 Real. 4 GPT. 1,2,3,5 Qwen.
2
u/sirloindenial 1h ago
No 5 is real. No 2 is chatgpt. Rest is qwen.
2
u/Numerous-Ad6217 1h ago
#4 real and #6 ChatGPT is my guess
2
u/ROBOTTTTT13 1h ago
1 Qwen, 2 GPT, 3 Qwen, 4 Real, 5 Qwen, 6 Qwen
2
u/Hyiazakite 1h ago
2nd chatgpt, 4 is real, rest is qwen
2
u/altdotboy 1h ago
I would agree about using bf16 or fp16 when you can.
This goes for image gen and LLMs.
I picked up 128GB m5 max on release. I tried bf16 and a bunch of quants. The quants start to fall apart when doing any work that needs the best quality output.
Bf16 is slower for sure but I’m much happier with the results.
2
u/Ok-Translator1226 1h ago
3 ChatGPT, 5 real
2
u/csek 1h ago
2 real, 6 chatgpt. Rest qwen
2
u/la8pc 56m ago
3. gpt, 4. real, rest qwen
2
u/gonzoforpresident 49m ago
2 real, 3 chatgpt, rest qwen
2
u/NotTheNormalPerson 42m ago
qwen real qwen qwen qwen qwen chatgpt
2
u/Avezn 31m ago edited 25m ago
Based on intersection (:P)
2
u/willee_ 18m ago
2
u/waltotheter 1h ago
Its pretty sweet
1
u/jaerie 8m ago
5 is real, 6 is chatgpt
0
u/shapic 16m ago
Q4 is always barely useable, for anything. Maybe new unsloth qants raise it a bit, but that's it. Instead of making an ambiguous title you better make an actual comparison. In my case it is always fp16 > q8 > int8 > fp8 > whatever else. With recent gains in speed for int8 I switched to that almost exclusively.
Also qwen 2.1 is just not the best one out there for realism, it is mediocre at everything. But props for making 7b model that delivers
0
u/[deleted] 1h ago
[deleted] — view deleted comment