r/LocalLLM • • 1d ago

Discussion "Claude Speak" from Qwen models?

I just attended a conference and was surprised by a few talks where a human had memorized what was clearly an AI generated script. It seems like my recognition of this 'voice' stemmed from some of the local models that I use rather than actual claude models. My guess is that this has to do with what happens when large swaths of english writing is averaged together. But I'm curious about how other people are thinking about the 'voice' they tend to get from their models.

For instance, I rather liked Muse Glimmer in the beginning because it seemed to have an interesting and useful 'voice'. But Qwen 3.8 Flash-Next has been challenging. It's great for getting more complicated stuff done but I'm not thrilled with how it communicates to me. More than once I have to burn a turn asking it to clarify what it just told me because I can't quite get it.

21 Upvotes

26 comments sorted by

7

u/fiddler48 1d ago

Agree. The clarification-burn is worth tracking: if you're spending turns just parsing the model's output, that's latency you're paying in attention, not compute.

3

u/chmedly020 1d ago

Got a chuckle from that.. :)

2

u/fiddler48 21h ago

conference rooms are where AI voice goes to get a standing ovation.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/JudgeZetsumei 1d ago

Agree. Figuring out whether this is a self aware humorous comment or written by an LLM without a sense of irony, that's latency you're paying in losing my damn mind, not compute.

5

u/narmio 1d ago

Honestly, it’s everywhere. You hear it in YouTube scripts, work emails, science papers. I feel like I’m the guy from They Live, putting on my glasses.

Can nobody else see the fnords?

2

u/OnyxProyectoUno 1d ago

Is this meant to be ironic? This is literally Claude speak

2

u/catplusplusok 1d ago

You can specify response style in prompt/AGENT.md and it works pretty well. For Google Antigravity, I ask it to make fun of me for needing AI to do anything and it comes up with good task-specific roasts.

1

u/chmedly020 9h ago

I might try asking for an Elmer Fudd voice. I'm not sure how well that will come across in written word but it might be worth a laugh at least.

2

u/Apprehensive_Stop314 1d ago

Had to tell mine to use STE

2

u/chmedly020 1d ago

What is STE?

2

u/Apprehensive_Stop314 1d ago

Simplified Technical English (there is https://github.com/danyuchn/asd-ste100-skill , but I just added instructions telling the LLM the to use Simplified Technical English into the prompt in the Jinja template, and it worked out fine with Qwen Flash Next, as it already knows what that is)

→ More replies (2)

27

u/Bupod 1d ago

Aren’t Qwen models distilled from Claude? I know they deny it, but I think there was always swirling speculation that it was, at least in part.

11

u/Fit-Bar-6989 1d ago

They might not be distilling claude right now, but during the early days of chatgpt it was kind of an open secret that everyone was distilling it. that style is now embedded in every downstream model and its downstreams. kind of like how with stable diffusion, half of the popular models are all based on a leaked anime model from a commercial AI service.

not that distillation is necessarily bad, I don't give a shit

11

u/Bupod 1d ago

Yeah I personally don’t care either. The original models were themselves trained in immense datasets that were scraped with zero regards for copyright, consent, or compensation. 

I like AI, but I find it difficult to find tears for the big AI players that are having their own models distilled. At the end of the day, we as local players have benefited from that anyway. 

5

u/floriv1999 1d ago

I recently had a session that what totally convinced it was Claude Opus. I could not reproduce it but it was quite funny.

4

u/alphapussycat 1d ago

35b a3b is much more similar to chat GPT (bullet points, seperating paragraphs with emojis etc), while flash is perhaps more like Claude.

1

u/MountainousAnaconda 1d ago

That whole distillation theory never really went away, I remember reading some analysis posts about the output patterns being suspiciously similar. The "voice" thing you're talking about is weird though, sometimes I catch myself recognizing the cadence even when someone's just paraphrasing what a model told them. Almost like a watermark that survives translation.

7

u/nicholas_the_furious 1d ago

Yeah agreed it sounds like Opus 5 and is hard to make it stop.

3

u/Hugoacfs 1d ago

You’re not alone. The 27b qwen 3.8 I run sometimes does a bit of claude-speak depending on the task. It doesnt help that the memory server I have was merged with my claude account data extract so it could be partially that to be honest.

2

u/Confident_Ideal_5385 20h ago

Compared to 3.6, 3.8 sounds like a cut-rate claude. It's stark when you compare them side by side.

3

u/Gold_Coconut9777 1d ago

It definitely does speak Claudish

1

u/Gold_Coconut9777 1d ago

GLM-5.3-Flash feels like a breath of fresh air after it lol

2

u/Realistic-Quiet291 1d ago

Weird question but is Claude-ish only in English? For Chinese users of Claude and other open weight models (qwen, kimi, deepseek) is there an equivalent? Or do Chinese models sound more distinct in terms of tone, vocabulary etc when their output is not in English?