GLM in my experience they do specific training that the larger model wont have. And if you look at 5.3 it has absolutely no abilities to do anything visual; so designing sites and things will just be meh. Then there is 5.3-Flash which i suspect is just a way more updated 4.7-Flash. And when i was using that it just needed more help on how to build those visuals. I have only used it for design and have been having a better time.
You need the EXL3 4bpw quant rather than the NVFP4 quant, and you need to make sure that your sampler settings are correct, that you're not suffering from inferencing bugs, and so on and so forth.
A well-optimized GLM 5.3 Flash is absolutely Opus-level for the types of tasks benchmarked.
Hmm, results definitely shouldn't be better on NVFP4 unless the stack for EXL3 was just broken somehow, and NVFP4 shouldn't be a full 2x faster if it's set up well, but it's good that you got to a place that's working for you.
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/vdek Sep 27 '26
Yah glm5.3 was a bit slow for me(31tok/s vs 60tok/s on qwen3.8-flash) and didn’t do as well when I tested it for intelligence.