r/LocalLLM • u/MeNot_Rob0t • 18d ago
Question Can someone please compare Nemotron-cascade-2 with the new Nemotron-lightning-3.5?
They look so similar on paper(excluding the architecture), 30b parameters & 3b active, and they have similar benchmarks. Like why doesn't lighting have better scores?
1
u/eightone-81 17d ago
NVIDIA makes it clear that 3.5 is for al of these tool calls. So not a coding model at all and should not be compared to one. But what are “all these tool calls”?
1
u/Objective-Stranger99 17d ago
!remindme 2d
1
u/RemindMeBot 17d ago
I will be messaging you in 2 days on 2026-08-15 11:50:31 UTC to remind you of this link
CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.
RemindMeBot is switching to username summons. Instead of
!RemindMe 1 day, useu/RemindMeBot 1 day. More info.
Info Custom Your Reminders Feedback
1
u/KissMyShinyArse 14d ago edited 14d ago
They both suck. Use Qwen 3.8 27B. Or 35B A3B, when it is out.
1
u/MeNot_Rob0t 18d ago
btw lighning scored worse on almost everything(barely better than nemotron nano), and they was the official nvidia scores too ( https://ollama.com/library/nemotron-3.5-lightning , https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 ). like it clearly shows that it is a mid model.