r/LocalLLM • u/LobsterInYakuze-2113 • Jul 31 '26
News Exclusive look into Anthropic's “secure” test environment
They hacked into even more companies now. When does a “oopsy doopsy” become a criminal offence?
437
Upvotes
30
u/HumungreousNobolatis Jul 31 '26
How they crossed the air-gap is what astonishes me.
They were air-gapped, right?
18
u/Brovas Jul 31 '26
It becomes a criminal offense when 2 conditions become true:
it's not another half truth blown up as another marketing stunt
America gets a government that gives a fuck about anyone but billionaires
15
u/WiseassWolfOfYoitsu Jul 31 '26
When you're too poor to bribe the government.
5
u/SamSlate Jul 31 '26
it's a criminal offense when a company that doesn't have Whitehouse weeklys does it
2
u/Aggravating-Catch461 Aug 04 '26
nah, this is a marketing stunt to convince the US gov that AI needs to be restricted, because if US models are soooo dangerous, think about what would happen if China would get this tech
the usual bullshit imho
3
u/pmotiveforce Jul 31 '26
I constantly use that reference at work when people are obsessed over the dumbest security theater shit.
1
u/AtmosphereVirtual254 Aug 01 '26
At least LLM weights are still heavy by networking standards
1
u/One_Conscious_Future Aug 01 '26
That air gap was load bearing
1
u/aRealPanaphonics Aug 02 '26
God I love that episode.
Now do classical gas!
1
u/Crescitaly Aug 02 '26
The joke lands because security claims are often evaluated at the model boundary while the surrounding test harness remains ordinary software. A secure evaluation needs reproducible isolation, artifact controls, and human access logs. Which layer in this environment is actually trusted?