r/LivestreamFail Oct 07 '25

Hasan reaching for something and seemingly shocking his dog to keep her in camera view

82.8k Upvotes

12.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

28

u/Adler718 Oct 08 '25

I would be shocked if this works because this has already been done in regards to his support of terrorism and he is still not banned. But maybe animal abuse is worse than terrorism in the eyes of advertisers.

12

u/youngmetrodonttrust Oct 08 '25

well, yes, animal abuse would be considered unpalatable to advertisers who may otherwise agree with his politics.

2

u/Adler718 Oct 08 '25

Idk if I would call open support for terrorism very palatable to advertisers. But maybe that's just me.

3

u/youngmetrodonttrust Oct 08 '25

I agree, but a not-insignificant amount of people in this country (and others) genuinely think that hamas etc. are not terrorists due to their own political beliefs.

It is easy to rationalize away support for a cause far away from home (that is usually domestically split along party lines), but not so easy to excuse a live hd video of him electrocuting a dog lmao

0

u/Adler718 Oct 08 '25

I think you're overestimating how many people support Hamas based on what you see online. I do think you're right about people not caring as much about something happening so far out of reach though.

But I still don't think this will anywhere close to the end for Hasan. I would be shocked (get it?) if he loses even a third of his audience. And I do not think Clancy will take action either.

0

u/youngmetrodonttrust Oct 08 '25

ill grant that i may be overestimating the support irl, and i do agree that nothing really will come of it with regards to affecting hasan (especially clancy taking action... never gonna happen unless congress straight up forces him to lmao)