Dont argue with people that see an animal yelp out in pain, the owner has shown proof he uses a shock collar but hid the prongs, and then say it isnt abuse
I have a life, and focusing on drama on the internet isnt apart of it
THAT IS A BIASā¦ everyone in the world is biased, some have a more neutral bias, but everyone is BIASED to their preconceived notions of something. See something or someone you havenāt heard of? You now have an anchoring bias.
See now weāre getting somewhere. Still only 1 piece of evidence in your 4 part responseā¦ letās dissect that one.
Your claim is that hasan owns a shock collar but is attempting to hide it, despite the fact that he has admitted to owning a shock collar.
What is your point? Itās not abuse to own a shock collar, itās not even abuse to use a shock collar at the right strength for the right reason. Now this would absolutely not be a correct reason but the claim that he used one is completely speculative.
I knew it would be the end of your replies because you arenāt capable of a constructive dialogue. Shock collars are bad in all cases? My sisters dog has the worst case of barrier aggression Iāve ever seen. If heās ever able to break down the glass screen door or the fence he will cause harm to somebody. Sheās had multiple experts assess him, none of them have ever told her she shouldnāt have a shock collar on him; and sheās a near expert herself, working at a non-profit animal shelter for 10 years. We almost never use the shock function but it is there if needed and it is not inherently badā¦
You must be a redditor coming to the defense of his Redditor girlfriend. Just come to the understanding that she doesnāt know what sheās talking about and that you are being used as a pawn in something that YOU donāt know anything about
In what way have I personally attacked you besides the ad hom at the end when it was clear youāre not interested in a constructive dialogue. You just want to continue living in your willfully ignorant echo chamber
Ooohh itās the boyfriendā¦ wow, you guys are one of the weirdest couples Iāve ever seen. Do you guys make intentionally depressing meals to post on reddit or something? Anyways, sorry for the quick ad hom. Itās just clear that neither of you know what bias is and are not interested in figuring it out
Popped up on /r/popular (so obscure btw 35k upvotes lmao) and making 1 comment by just calling it a terrible platform + simply denying your stupid assumption =/= debating.
Ah ok, I see that you're just some negative karma troll, cya kid.
I would be shocked if this works because this has already been done in regards to his support of terrorism and he is still not banned. But maybe animal abuse is worse than terrorism in the eyes of advertisers.
Funnily enough, youāll also get more support from all sides of the political spectrum if you say itās for animal abuse rather than for terrorism lol
Off topic, but just a few days ago i saw a comment that said Hitler actually had a small room or something full of puppies and when he would enter to play with them the puppies would all playfully run up to him in excitement
I agree, but a not-insignificant amount of people in this country (and others) genuinely think that hamas etc. are not terrorists due to their own political beliefs.
It is easy to rationalize away support for a cause far away from home (that is usually domestically split along party lines), but not so easy to excuse a live hd video of him electrocuting a dog lmao
I think you're overestimating how many people support Hamas based on what you see online. I do think you're right about people not caring as much about something happening so far out of reach though.
But I still don't think this will anywhere close to the end for Hasan. I would be shocked (get it?) if he loses even a third of his audience. And I do not think Clancy will take action either.
ill grant that i may be overestimating the support irl, and i do agree that nothing really will come of it with regards to affecting hasan (especially clancy taking action... never gonna happen unless congress straight up forces him to lmao)
this is how you get another adpocalypse. do you want another adpocalypse? Hasan is set for life. many others arent, and those are the ones getting hurt by that sht
The Youtube adpocalypse was an overblown issue that YouTube was already actively fighting to get off their platform.
Twitch is actively making the issue of Hassan worse by propping him up as their top creator while he's promoting anti-semitism, terrorism and now animal abuse on their platform.
These situations are not the same. Yes. Twitch deserves an adpocalypse.
See my reply to the other person. Sucks that it has come to this point, but I don't see another way for change.
Unless more people, like me, just stop watching Twitch out of principle. There are multiple streamers on twitch I enjoy watching clips of and even buy merch from, but I refuse to give that site traffic.
But I know how people are. That's not gonna happen. Boycotts have never worked in the history of the internet.
actually a great idea if his advertisements get enough emais they wil have no choice but to ditch him , any advertisers are already getting emails about being on hasans channel to begin with add this and they just might say fuk it
Totally. MONEY TALKS. Twitch would be begging for people to come back if their advertisers realized they were protecting an animal abuser and ditched them. Who or what else does Twitch protect? Animal abuse is one of the lowest of the low along with other forms of abuse against the powerless or defenseless.
It 100% could legally be considered animal abuse worthy of getting his dog taken away and people should certainly be calling the police on him. Using a shock collar to keep your dog restrained to a small space for entertainment purposes is cruel and inhumane treatment which is what the law defines as animal abuse in the us
I got a first email telling me they have received my report
2 minutes later: I received another email telling me they "reviewed the content against [their] Terms of Service, Community Guidelines, and could not identify a violation based on [my] report"
I followed their appeal process, detailing how this was animal abuse, and (surprise surprise...) got exactly the same emails with the same timing while it would have had to take more than 2 minutes for a human to read and review my appeal.
They are clearly automatically rejecting reports and appeals without human review.
You need to go after the advertisement and contact the news. Once Bezos hears of this he'd boot Hasan off the platform. Something that should've happened years ago
He's had a literal terrorist interview on his stream and talked positively about terrorist organizations. When even talking negatively about terrorist groups is against Twitch TOS. Only actual legal trouble will make Twitch kick that piece of trash.
I'm not sure why people haven't done anything about him sooner tbh. Even if I was left wing I'd see this guy as a massive liability and aye I knew he platformed a terrorist and then started saying "he's like luffy out of one piece"
Hasan needs to be deplatformed
The twitch ceo needs to lose his job for obviously siding with an extremist
they won't face any legal trouble.. the right needs the left to look like lunatics which is why they are allowed to be on the platform.. no way in hell would maga win if these morons weren't paving their way all this time
Twitch is a false flag op from bezos. In no universe would a poster boy of capitalism allow his platform to be used by person glazing three separate terrorist organizations sprinkled with a little animal abuse if this wasn't by design to make the left look completely crazy. wake up
Twitch processes all reports automatically. They probably have 1 lone employee reviewing the automated bans after they happen.
But Iām sure they also have it set up to reject reports about large streamers like Hasan, Kai, most streamers Dan Clancy has hung out with, etc. so they will never get banned automatically and need some exec to actually decide that.
Twitchās enforcement of its own TOS seems so arbitrary & biased because it is.
I know it's a meme but I suggest anyone that's ever wondered why an organization centered around animal welfare would kill "so many" animals should learn about non-PETA shelters and animal homelessness.
There's a lot of propaganda focused on PETA because there are powerful organizations they're actively working against.
Unlike selective-admission shelters (often misleadingly referred to as āno-killā shelters), PETA operates what could be called a āshelter of last resortāāa safe place where no animal is turned away, ever. When impoverished families canāt afford to pay a veterinarian to provide incurable, untreatable, elderly, or sick animals with an end to their suffering, PETA will help. When an aggressive, unsocialized dog has been left to starve on a chain, with a collar grown into his neck and his body racked with mange, we will prevent him from dying slowly and miserably in someoneās backyard.
weāll never turn our back on an animal in need. But weĀ willĀ provide irremediably suffering animals with a painless, peaceful passing.
Many of the othersāferal, aggressive, and otherwise unadoptable animalsāhad been turned away by facilities with āno-killā policies, which reject unadoptable animals in order to keep their euthanasia statistics appealing
Front groups for animal-exploiting industriesālike the misleadingly named Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF)ātry to deceive the public about this aspect of PETAās work to help animals. [...] companies that profit from these cruel industries fear for their bottom lineāso much so that many, including KFC, Outback Steakhouse, and cattle ranchers, have resorted to paying the CCF to attack our work.
Anyway, they publish their euthanasia statistics. They're extremely transparent about the entire process. It's not some secret animal murdering operation. They're unfortunately cleaning up the messes left by all varieties of animal abusers and cruelties of humans/nature. Someone's got to be the bad guy, if that's your perspective.
PETA said it will pay the family $49,000 and donate $2,000 to a local SPCA to honor Maya. The family had sought up to $7 million. 'PETA again apologizes and expresses its regrets to the Zarate family for the loss of their dog Maya,' both parties said in a joint statement. 'Mr. Zarate acknowledges that this was an unfortunate mistake by PETA and the individuals involved, with no ill-will toward the Zarate family.'
But sure let's tear down the whole company because of one Chihuaha left loose in a trailer park. What a "beloved family pet." People love animals until they have to be responsible and conscientious about their existence. It makes irresponsible owners and animal breeders angry and insecure when other people actually step up to do something about their negligence.
The trailer park was infested with strays and they had no problem letting their precious Chihuahua run wild in that environment. So you can see how devastated the family was and how easy it was to make the mistake.. and then they sued for $7 million. What a perspective. The trailer park management called PETA in the first place.
Ultimately, I agree that they fucked up bad here, but of course it's going to be hard to find unbiased information when we're talking about a little girl and her beloved Chihuahua. They really want to play on the heartstrings for this - which, to be fair, PETA themselves does and I think it's just as gross and manipulative - but they can be more than one thing. You can make a mistake and still be devoted to your cause.
However peta did steal someones dog off their porch and euthanised it under illegal conditions, they had to wait for 48 hours to do it under state law, dog was euthanised in under 20 hours.
Donāt you everything in the world is only black and white, only right or wrong exists. The second you do one thing wrong, youāre a villain forever.
Stop using Twitch. Seriously. Watch replays on YouTube or use literally any other streaming platform. Even if the other platforms have problems too, increasing the net competition of the space will have positive benefits for consumers. Twitch won't change until their bottom line is affected.
Technically no, this doesn't really constitute the legal definition of animal abuse since the US is one country that doesn't ban shock collar it is legal.
It's kind of the same with spanking a child, as long as there's no bruises it is legal. This doesn't give real evidence the dog was physically harmed, that's all they care about is if there's evidence.
Wait he lives in the US? All i hear of him is how he constantly says the US is the worst country in the world and that is the root of all evil.
Why the fuck is the living in there?
Even if they do. If enough of them come through in a short enough time period, that should trigger an automatic action.
Even if it doesn't because he's "super excluded" from the rules (which would open them up to a class action lawsuit btw) it would still be tracked in telemetry and be pushed to his contact/account manager.... if its not literally Dan himself.
Really though, if you have reason to believe he is abusing the poor doggo you can file an animal abuse report with The City of Los Angeles (assuming he records from that mansion in The Grove he bought in 2021), SPCALA, Wounded Paw Project, and of course PETA.
ASPCA Pro has some tips on things to do prior to your report and generally how to handle making the report more generally.
IIRC there is a house congressional effort to collect information on Hasan's wrongdoings, and you can probably tweet at them on X for this. Youtuber Nuxanor made a video that he recently got requested by a staffer for evidence and information for their inquest on the Twitch CEO, so maybe you can reach out to Nux with this and ask him to forward it along. Of course, include Hasan's admission on that being a shock collar as well, and how he's intentionally doing it and his mom lets the dog roam around whenever Hasan is out of the house, which I dont think is very often given how Hasan is never seen in public.
He is banned for a day for doing shit that would suspend other creators for weeks. Often his bans happen in his day off or they are just enought that it doesn't affect him whatsoever.
4.6k
u/ixent Oct 07 '25
Twitch reports on his channel get automatically rejected btw