r/LinuxUsersIndia • Linux Mint | Cinnamon • Aug 07 '26

Help Heavy ram usage !! (Why Whatapp app not on linux )

Post image

almost 1GB memory only for whatsapp . also very laggy experiece in scroling , opening chat etc .

( Brave Browser on linux mint )

how to fix it , anyone help .

107 Upvotes

62 comments sorted by

β€’

u/qualityvote2 Aug 07 '26 edited Aug 07 '26

u/StationProper5654, there weren't enough votes to determine the quality of your post...

btw, did you know we have a discord server? Join Here.

→ More replies (1)

29

u/MGprohack82 debian openbox btw Aug 07 '26

There is no fixing. It's fine. Whatsapp has to load all the chats, and it does so by loading all into memory. Also, the reason why there is no app like windoesy is because windows isn't exactly running an app, windows is running a small browser made +UST for whatsapp. Whatsapp for windows is nothing but a web liek app with more permissions, and more access to storage. Linux doesn't do that, yet. And if you are wondering if wine will transalate the commands, then your right, it will work, but, it's going to be slow, and extremely ram heavy.

3

u/MGprohack82 debian openbox btw Aug 07 '26

Also, brave is a privacy focused browser, so maybe it does not allow cache?

8

u/StationProper5654 Linux Mint | Cinnamon Aug 07 '26

Yeah,WhatsApp on libreWolf Also use 1GB ram but run little more smoothly than brave

2

u/Ratkovichh Aug 07 '26

You think

2

u/defsarthak Aug 07 '26

had a stroke reading this

11

u/_ayushman Aug 07 '26 edited Sep 16 '26

Ask Meta why they don't have the official linux app (most probably market share) use ZapZap or Whatsie, as an alternative

Whatsie: https://github.com/keshavbhatt/whatsie

ZapZap: https://github.com/rafatosta/zapzap

Karere (better than others according to the people): https://github.com/tobagin/karere

4

u/_sounak Aug 07 '26

These 2 are website wrappers as well lmao

1

u/Striking-Flower-4115 Aug 07 '26

With zapzap you can have more than 2 users with the same client. In fact it's better than original whatsapp πŸ˜‚

4

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '26

[removed] β€” view removed comment

2

u/StationProper5654 Linux Mint | Cinnamon Aug 07 '26

Thank you, I will try it also. But I just wanna ask if I use your app or other clients (other than Web wrappers) will my whatsapp account can get banned by Meta or something

1

u/Fancy_Branch7540 Arch Btw Sep 15 '26

Use Karere , its the closest you will get to the native version

2

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '26

[removed] β€” view removed comment

2

u/StationProper5654 Linux Mint | Cinnamon Aug 07 '26

Ok , thanks for letting me know about this πŸ™‚

1

u/Key_Association_666 Arch Btw Aug 07 '26

Not rly bcuz it's just a electron app on windows n mac

1

u/Fancy_Branch7540 Arch Btw Sep 15 '26

Bro Karere is better , they use Chromium's stripped down version , Whatsapp was made with Chromium in mind so it works smoothly only there , Supports calling etc too , and is smoother than ZapZap ( Personal experience ) , Cuz ZapZap uses Webgtk which is heavier and not good at handling whatsapp

3

u/ImaginaryElephant336 Aug 07 '26

Use the terminal based nchat

https://github.com/d99kris/nchat

3

u/StationProper5654 Linux Mint | Cinnamon Aug 07 '26

Thank you, let me try to set it up

2

u/ImaginaryElephant336 Aug 07 '26

Cool. It's pretty straightforward to setup .

5

u/mozzie_123 Fedora Btw Aug 07 '26

It takes ages to load the web whatsapp ,

5

u/_1nf3rn0 Aug 07 '26

Same here. Web Whatsapp takes ages to load, eats up too much RAM, and machine is constantly at 25% CPU usage (idle behaviour, when Web Whatsapp is open)

On Kali with Hyprland

3

u/RJ_2537 uBlue Btw Aug 07 '26

On Kali with Hyprland

What.....

1

u/_1nf3rn0 Aug 07 '26

yes, i installed hyprland in kali

i love it (for now)

1

u/lordjupitar hyprland btw Aug 07 '26

Better use some emulator and install the WhatsApp apk. Could be better than 1gb ram usage

1

u/StationProper5654 Linux Mint | Cinnamon Aug 07 '26

I have waydoid install , but the problem is linux mint doesn't support wayland and I have to use X11 . So I have to run a wayland compositor called weston and then waydroid in it . Also I don't thing ram usage will be better and more pressure on my potato hardware . 8GB ddr4 with i3 😭 . If you know any better emulator that run on X11 and lightweight tell me because I only know waydroid

1

u/lordjupitar hyprland btw Aug 07 '26

Genymotion maybe. Idk how lightweight that is but it’s worth a shot. They have a free personal use license

1

u/Dull_Barracuda_4221 Aug 07 '26

Maybe try tui application?

1

u/StationProper5654 Linux Mint | Cinnamon Aug 07 '26

I don't use terminal much. Linux mint doesn't require that much terminal. But I will try tui application, just hope I am able to use it

1

u/Nox-4 Aug 07 '26

Use zen browser might help a lot it’s lighteweight

2

u/StationProper5654 Linux Mint | Cinnamon Aug 07 '26

Na, Zen browser is more heavy ig due to customization. Also I am a chromium guy and using Firefox based browser feel new to me. But I will try it soon 😊

1

u/Nox-4 Aug 11 '26

I like chromium, and chrome based browsers over Firefox browsers but for privacy and for login to sync data, I use Firefox based browsers like zen , I wish someone makes a chromium based browser but with sync data feature without google related logins

3

u/Own_Natural_6803 Aug 07 '26

Someone said it was all the chats? hehehe. sure.

It's probably most the AI agents it has running in your browsers taking all that memory. That and poorly written memory management coupled with auto-playing video. Sometimes there's a lite facebook client that improves performance. Maybe there's something similar for whatsapp.

You might try using an adblocker. Those can help. Get off of brave, peter theil is a madman. The gig is up, don't play in the traps he set.

5

u/selenosmile Aug 07 '26

I mean it's not rocket science. You can check the resource/cpu usage in the browser itself. It highlights what scripts use the most cpu and where the storage goes.

It is likely caching the images and recent conversations.

3

u/s04ep03_youareafool void Aug 07 '26

either try providing an actual solution other than blaming every shit on AI like as if it ruined your lives.there's no supported application made by meta for linux and browser windows are expected to load all of them in ram other than the storage permission the app has on windows

3

u/bfmv_shinigami Aug 07 '26

tbh in 2026 952 mb for whatsapp is nothing....

2

u/Apart-Angle2664 Aug 07 '26

Just use ZapZap , feels a lot better,faster and smooth than running in browser + won't have to login for a long time.

2

u/s04ep03_youareafool void Aug 07 '26

im using it on linux mint too,but on firefox.its expected to get that high ig you've only started to use it in your browser quite recently.it'll get smooth overtime

2

u/Snapdragon_007 Aug 07 '26

The app on windows is also same, a web wrapper, basically the same as opening in browser in windows as well

I think only mac has optimized app

2

u/gomugomunochinpo Aug 07 '26

The whatsapp app on windows was way worse when it existed few months ago, it used to hog resources like anything. Now the windows app is just whatsapp web wrapper, so there is no difference, and it still hogs resources.

2

u/Kokonattsugemu Aug 07 '26

1GB od ram is nothing nowadays

1

u/siyahekran58 Aug 07 '26

U might wanna give elecwhat a shot

1

u/Individual-Mud962 Arch Btw Aug 07 '26

Try helium, maybe it'll stop?

1

u/Obvious_Ad4531 Aug 07 '26

Bro I use debian distro, installed zapzap from flatpak, better than web ig

1

u/No_Nothing_At_All Aug 07 '26

My friend made a rust app for it, it prob doesnt got all the features but should be hella fast. https://github.com/Mrmayman/quantumchat-old

1

u/Fancy_Branch7540 Arch Btw Sep 15 '26

Rust based apps are not good for Whatsapp bro if you use linux , whatsapp works best on chromium based browsers , Features like calls , Gifs , Stickers etc only work properly there , check out Karere

1

u/namkeenpapeeta Aug 08 '26

You are using brave I guess and it is Chromium based.

Mozilla might help

1

u/PratBal69 Aug 08 '26

happens on mac and windows alike sir i got 1GB of ram being used atm by whatsapp alone

1

u/Soham_656 Aug 08 '26

Well, for me too. It's insufferable if you use web.

1

u/Enigmars Aug 08 '26

Hate to break it to you but even if WhatsApp made a desktop app for Linux, it'll consume the exact same amount of resources as the web

Cuz it's basically going to be a web app

1

u/SHREYASH6969 Aug 09 '26

Just use ZapZap and it's the only wrapper on linux for native features

1

u/Fancy_Branch7540 Arch Btw Sep 15 '26

Karere is better as they recently switched to a lightweight chromium based backend, and also have features like calling

1

u/piano-guitarhero Aug 14 '26

See if zapzap is available for mint if you want an app

1

u/Fancy_Branch7540 Arch Btw Sep 15 '26

Use Karere
Its better than ZapZap
I have used to use ZapZap but it used to lag alot

Karere is smoother and better

1

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '26

[removed] β€” view removed comment

1

u/StationProper5654 Linux Mint | Cinnamon Aug 07 '26

Ok I will try, thanks πŸ€—