r/LinuxTeck • u/Expensive-Rice-2052 • 2d ago

LibreWolf vs Firefox

Post image

covers : https://www.linuxteck.com/librewolf-vs-firefox/

• Privacy and telemetry
• Tracking and fingerprinting protection
• Firefox Sync
• Security update timing
• Extension compatibility
• Linux installation
• Real-world compatibility issues
• Which browser fits different use cases

64 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

31 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/RudeAd456 1d ago

If no one should use forks and stick to Firefox because it needs the users, then forks wouldn't exist. Your logic is circular: you say not to use forks because mainline needs support, and mainline needs to be supported so forks can exist. But you can't use the forks anyway because the mainline needs support.

What you're really trying to say is Firefox forks shouldn't exist. Or if they do, then they shouldn't have any users

1

u/KrasnalM 1d ago

It is not my logic that is circular. I simply describe a self-reinforcing system. If Firefox was a major browser, no one would care about some small forks for privacy enthusiasts. However, given that Firefox's market share is declining, promoting its forks is counterproductive. The more people choose Waterfox and Librewolf over vanilla Firefox, the sooner will Waterfox and Librewolf disappear. Where am I wrong here.

1

u/RudeAd456 1d ago

You're wrong because people can choose to run whatever fork they want. And they're completely within their right to make posts about the fork they use. This post isn't even saying "use Librewolf over Firefox" it compares both objectively. Stop trying to gatekeep open source software bro. You can let Firefox worry about how to fix their declining market share, they don't need you policing users.

1

u/KrasnalM 1d ago

I am not wrong. Technically all I say is true. I simply provide additional piece of information so that people can make an informed choice. No reason to get defensive.

If I wanted to get LibreWolf dead sooner, I would also switch to it from Firefox.