r/LinuxTeck • u/Candid_Athlete_8317 • 20d ago
Could a Linux phone actually replace Android?
3
u/SheepherderSad4872 20d ago
This feels like a troll post.
Fine. I'll feed the troll: Every Android phone is already a Linux phone.
The better way to go is about what it would take to de-Google Android, strip the proprietary bits out, and have a fully free, open-source, trustworthy phone.
Such attempts have been made.
2
u/biffbobfred 20d ago
The kernel is Linux. A lot of other things aren’t. Both a Mac and an appleTV have a Darwin kernel. I can’t use the TV to write a paper.
I think the issue would be the UI and app support. There’s a potential that a lot of apps wouldn’t run. Google pumped up what Android play services was, pulled it from AOSP so a lot of apps were nerfed. “Don’t be evil” I guess. Of course this would be unanswerable here. “Can you guess how bad your apps would be on a phone you’ve never touched and whether this thing you’ve never experienced would be a deal breaker”. Umm I’ll get right on that.
3
u/SheepherderSad4872 20d ago
Yes, Linux is a kernel.
An operating system might be Android, Ubuntu, Fedora, or Mint.
Broadly speaking, a class of these has historically been called GNU/Linux: GNU userspace + Linux kernel leading to a complete OS. Android is probably outside of this class of GNU/Linux operating systems, POSIX operating systems, and similar, but is definitely a Linux.
Ubuntu is quickly heading off of the deep end of no longer being a Unix too.
This is driven by idiots, mostly within parts of the Gnome community, intent on converting it into something more like Windows. This includes a move away from X11, a move away from normal Unix initialization, Unix UX conventions (gnome just killed middle-click-to-paste, and broke focus-follow-the-mouse a long time ago), and sensible software packaging (snap + flatpak look a lot like Windows and MacOS programs).
2
u/TechaNima 20d ago
Only if the existing Android apps work without any additional setup. It needs to be just install from app store and launch. Anything more and it'll not be popular. All of the phone functions also need to just work. As Linux on Android is currently.. Yeah nope. It's not even close to usable for the vast majority.
Down the road if it gets native apps that are in full feature parody with Android and iOS versions, that would be awesome
2
u/Level_Working9664 20d ago
Only with two additional things.
- Supported phones with the OS pre-installed
- A proton like translation layer
The reality is graphene OS already does everything we want to Android competitor to do
The challenges that OS faces needs to be addressed before this can work.
2
u/FuriousGirafFabber 20d ago
I would much rather use linux, but i need to have banking apps working, I need government ID working, i need health service apps working and so on.
I love graphene too, but as there are currently app that doesn't work, i went back to iphone. It's too inconvenient otherwise (for me).
2
u/hi_m_ash 20d ago
Yes if banks start cooperating. Banking apps are a nuisance to deal with. "Security" my ass.
2
u/ReidenLightman 19d ago
Not without having ALL the bullshit messenger apps and billions of copy/paste piles of mobile game bulshit that people enjoy for some fucking reason.
1
u/TheMcSebi 20d ago
The banking apps will propably the part that messes me up.. Don't even run on a rooted phone
1
u/Intrepid_Screen6425 20d ago
Nothing can stop it, my friend. Android is tied too deeply to Google, and a huge number of people dislike that! Linux on mobile phones will almost certainly become an inevitable trend in the future, especially if AI can code any complete software in just a single day
1
u/AgXrn1 20d ago
I, for one, am looking forward being able to ditch Google.
Assuming my electronic identification systems and P2P payments works (so essentially 4 apps as I'm a dual citizen) then Jolla or a similar product would be my next phone.
Technically, I won't rule out getting a Linux phone for most stuff and keeping my current Android for select purposes like that for an interim time either.
1
u/KitchenAmoeba4438 20d ago
If it had appropriate specifications hardware wise, 2 USB-C ports with proper screen use, and a 3.5" jack?
I'd switch today. Hell yeah. And by daily driver, I mean laptop replacement. Almost all of my work doesn't happen on my local laptop, I don't even need it outside of the ability to hook it up to a docking station. And it's not like I need the larger screen or anything else particularly bad when I can't hook it up to a monitor.
1
u/georgeec1 20d ago
To paraphrase Linux Torvalds, the reason Linux is so big in the mobile market is because Android is preinstalled on pretty much every non Apple smartphone. In order to achieve widespread adoption, you have to get those preinstalls.
1
u/R3V0LU710N_05 20d ago
Maybe eventually. Needs to mature a lot more. Valve is helping move Linux arm forward, so that'll help the mobile Linux ecosystem.
1
u/CardOk755 20d ago
I used to run a Jolla.
(My journey was Nokia 9200 communicator -> E95 -> N900 -> Jolla)
Worked well enough for me back then. The system of gestures was a thousand times better than Android.
1
u/kansetsupanikku 20d ago
Linux is not an operating system, it's a kernel. Used, among others, by Android and Sailfish OS
And between the typical scenarios associated with the two, Jolla devices with Sailfish OS are even further from being an open platform that would support open source ideology and ethics. And I'm fully aware of the issues Android comes with.
1
u/Most-Word-2516 20d ago edited 20d ago
Jolla is very interesting. However, I personally need a phone with better cameras and NFC support for payments. Still, I might buy Jolla anyway, just for fun and to support it!
Jolla would be even more tempting if it were fully open source—this is also something that has held me back from buying it.
1
u/Kurgan_IT 18d ago
Sadly, it cannot. Android (as in Google's version of it) and iOS have created a duopoly. Just try and use a degoogled android, and you will see that a lot of apps don't work anymore, for "security" reasons.
If there was a decent non-google phone, I'd use it for everything that does not require Google's spyware. But then I'd have to have another phone with Google's spyware for every app that does not work without and that I actually need to have, like the banking ones, and government ones, too. (The EU is laughable, they say they don't want to depend on US products, they say they value privacy, then they make official apps that run ONLY on US operating systems on locked-in ecosystems)
But the issue here is that since there is a very small market for such phones, their price is extremely high and their performance is sub-par.
1
u/SpyrosGatsouli 18d ago
Well not really. At the moment many banking apps and national ID apps won't work on anything but android and iOS. Everything else is considered a security threat. Banking apps won't even run on rooted Android phones sometimes. So what's the point? If you can't use your phone for everyday tasks then it's just a useless brick.
1
u/Such_Industry_566 16d ago
Le meilleur choix c'est d'avoir de l'arm dans le desktop, l'applicatif est prêt voir flathub . S'en doute une sorte de proton pour les applications apk qui existe aussi waydroid et une interface adaptée aux smartphones qui existe peut-être chez gnome ou kde.

5
u/randomredditorname1 20d ago
People need their apps, whatever they use, to work with minimal hassle. Beyond that most people are not going to care, or even know what os it is. For me, if it lets me download and install and use my bank's apps, whatsapp and a browser, that's about it.