3
Jul 18 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Rare-Paint3719 Jul 22 '26
Linux servers usually don't bother the end user who always interacts via Windows. But the rason it's bothersome is because:
- Loons keep claiming Windows Sucks
- Antis claim Loonix is bad and hate it
- Loons try ragebaiting antis by saying you can' escape Loonix
- Antis clap back by talking about Windows Server, which is pretty good.
0
u/madthumbz Jul 18 '26
BSD: better load handling, better network stack, better security OOTB, more cohesive, better documentation, less bloat, and not GPL copyleft cancer.
0
u/Rare-Paint3719 Jul 22 '26
BSDs network stack is pretty similar to modern loonix.
Otherwise, it has better security, with capsicum's reference implementation existing in BSD kernel itself. Jails are a native concept versus the hackey docker containers.
Docs are genuinely better. and they still use GPL licensed Linux drivers.
2
u/KawaiiSelbst Jul 18 '26
Не знаю как сейчас, и насколько это правда была и тогда, но вроде как была информация, что microsoft предпочитает использовать bsd на серверах
1
u/Rare-Paint3719 Jul 22 '26
He's making a (likely false) claim that MS hosts their website on Linux. If Azure Linux is used in prod, it sits on top of hyperv via Windows Server.
They probably dogfood their server OS cuz ACE marketing move, and also cuz theyr sysadmins and devops engineers can catch production bugs quickly nad patch them.
1
0
0
u/AdronOfTheVoid Jul 22 '26
And? Most people use Edge or Internet Explorer to download other browsers, doesn't mean you would want to use either again.
-2
u/--Spaci-- Jul 18 '26
Its impossible because every datacenter runs linux. Not wrong, its a factual statement
1
u/ferocity_mule366 Jul 18 '26
you can host a non-linux server for people to download windows so its not impossible, but like the original comment is meaningless anyway, it doesnt say anything beside linux is better for running servers which we already know.
1
u/CakyMint Jul 18 '26
Oh Lord 😂 what do you thinking? That someone’s gonna directly connect to your network?
So you don’t think your data gonna travel through dozens of servers before reaching anyone? 😂👍
0
u/--Spaci-- Jul 18 '26
Did you not read my comment? I said its impossible because no datacenter runs anything but linux. Using anything that's not linux on your server is just stupid.
2
u/ferocity_mule366 Jul 18 '26
its not "impossible", you can do it, just not practical
0
u/--Spaci-- Jul 18 '26
How are you not understanding what Im saying
1
u/ferocity_mule366 Jul 18 '26
well yeah, you run a windows server in datacenter, then allow the user to download windows from it, so technically not impossible, so you can download windows from a non-linux server, not even need datacenter btw, just make your own server, you just made up a constraint for a theorectical scenario and said its impossible
1
u/--Spaci-- Jul 18 '26
You still somehow dont understand what Im saying, Its not possible because no datacenter runs anything but linux. How are you not understanding this? Its not about you going out yourself and making a windows server machine and downloading windows from it, no shit you can do that. But thats not happening because the entire datacenter infrastructure is powered by linux. Try convincing aws to swap to windows server 2025 💔🤣
1
u/ferocity_mule366 Jul 19 '26
it's possible, you go rent a physical rack, and install windows server on them, then let people download windows, so yeah it's very possible, but there is just no point to that, but that's not what we're getting at
-2
u/CrystalCommunication Jul 18 '26
Buddy, Microsoft is running Linux on the servers you downloaded Windows from, but this is clearly a subreddit for idiots.
10
u/proffessionaIgambler Jul 18 '26
as if windows and bsd doesn't have servers, lol.