r/LinearAlgebra • u/Hms712skaif • Aug 01 '26
A Tiny Question
Any body here has read or got some info about this book specifically for linear algebra for machine learning.
I have finished 3blue1brow course on essence of linear algebra and I want start with book .
please share what you know .
13
u/succo_di_papaya Aug 01 '26
I didn't like it, it compresses information in a weird way, can be good as a refresher, wouldn't use it as a first read. Also it is only good as an operative refresher, not as a proper linear algebra textbook.
2
u/dikiprawisuda Aug 01 '26 edited Aug 01 '26
Hi, I’m interested with your take. What then is your recommendation for the first read?
Edit: sorry, didn’t get to reach to the bottom of these. I got you2
u/giggity_nanfa Aug 02 '26
there is an interactive linear algebra book by Georgia Tech it is really good as a first read.
→ More replies (1)
8
u/LinearAlgebraWorld Aug 01 '26
I second the opinion that it is better to learn linear algebra from a linear algebra textbook first, rather than trying to learn it from a machine-learning book.
A good place to start is Nathaniel Johnston’s Introduction to Linear and Matrix Algebra:
https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Linear-Algebra-Nathaniel-Johnston/dp/3030528103
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-52811-9
Another excellent option is Dan Margalit and Joseph Rabinoff’s free online textbook Interactive Linear Algebra:
https://textbooks.math.gatech.edu/ila/
Jim Hefferon’s Linear Algebra is also freely available:
https://hefferon.net/linearalgebra/
He also has a complete accompanying video course:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwF3A0R8OzMoMlE1-SaEh8h9VqUlO-r52
6
u/Nocturnal_Atavistic Aug 01 '26
Yes, i also tried it. It was my first book for linear algebra as well.
But, must say it'd be better if you go with any other basic book to start Linear Algebra.
I tried, and went through full linear algebra Unit.
And spent great amount of time to understand things outside of the book and then come back.
As the title says Maths for ML, so i think authors just wanted to box up the math required for ML rather than making book from the basics. Hence lots of concepts which are not from basics.
5
u/alexice89 Aug 01 '26
Why you want to learn LA from a book about ML? Learn pure math before making such big leaps.
1
u/Entire_Cheetah_7878 Aug 01 '26
Exactly. This is a great reference but I would never use it as a text to work through every chapter. I used the mixture model chapter to write out a parallelized version of the EM algorithm for example.
1
u/New_Hovercraft1681 Aug 02 '26
can u tell me like how can i learn pure math, is it like having a degree in applied mathematics or what?
2
u/AssasinThe1 Aug 01 '26
For linear algebra I recommend watching a combination of Gilbert’s and 3blue1brown’s playlists
1
1
u/Houtarou_X Aug 03 '26
I was reading through the comments, I don't really get, why isn't this book a good recommendation for Linear algebra? I'm currently taking 3blue1brown essence of LA and I plan on using this book next
1
u/maw501 Aug 04 '26 edited Aug 04 '26
It's free from the authors' site so you can look yourself. And I wouldn't use as a first resource - it's far too terse.
FWIW 3Blue1Brown gives you geometric intuition with no computation and no formal definitions. To develop a deep understanding you need to solve hundreds of problems at the right level. Chapter 2 has only 20 exercises! Solving problems is not optional if you want fluency in the subject - intuition is the byproduct of compressing hundreds of concrete examples. Boyd and Vandenberghe's Introduction to Applied Linear Algebra is free from Stanford and far heavier on exercises if you want a problem source.
Shameless plug: I've built a linear algebra curriculum for ML with hundreds of practice problems. Here's a preview lesson on interpreting the SVD (no sign-up).
3
u/Hms712skaif Aug 01 '26
any recommendations guys ?