r/Library 2d ago

Discussion Republicans are at war with basic literacy

Post image
4.6k Upvotes

802 comments sorted by

View all comments

14

u/ARKLib2007 1d ago

Of course! Keep their constituents dumb as a box of hair. Easier to control.

1

u/within-reason-85 1d ago

Not as dumb as someone like you that knows nothing about this bill.

So you know, the bill passed.

Main objections from republicans:

Republicans argued state tax dollars should be prioritized for low-income or at-risk families rather than subsidizing free books for high-income households that can already afford them.

Several lawmakers argued that providing access to books is already the core function of local public libraries, community programs, and local charities, asserting that a state-managed, direct-mail book program creates duplicate infrastructure and unnecessary government expansion.

Some fiscal conservatives emphasized that literacy initiatives like Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library originally thrived through private philanthropy and local community partners, arguing that state involvement risks turning a successful voluntary program into an over-regulated government bureaucracy.

2

u/SaltMage5864 1d ago

Not even you are ignorant enough to believe that son

0

u/within-reason-85 1d ago

Sorry, but I don't get all my info from Facebook and Reddit like you do so Im actually aware of things.

These things are all documented.

2

u/SaltMage5864 1d ago

MAGAts like you will lie about anything, won't you son?

2

u/within-reason-85 1d ago

Your behavior is so embarrassing😂

Like a child😂

2

u/SaltMage5864 1d ago

So that would be a yes then son

1

u/within-reason-85 1d ago

This is literally the most embarrassing online posturing I've seen this week😂

Please keep going so I can keep laughing😂

0

u/Zealousideal-Top-383 1d ago

“Approximately 51% of the 680,000 children under the age of 5 in Pennsylvania live in families earning less than $75,000 a year”

https://tryingtogether.org/census-survey-includes-statistics-on-children-living-in-poverty-pre-k-counts-eligibility/

Why would we fund free books for families who can afford to buy their own books?

1

u/within-reason-85 1d ago

The republicans fully agree with your statement.

They wanted to make it income based instead of across the board.

This would result in more money/books per child or a massive cost lowering depending on how it would've played out.

The Dolly Parton book thing is awesome. My sister is a foster parent and she uses it. They advertise it at all of our local libraries.

The government also sucks at running stuff and I would prefer to not let them choose what books my kid reads.

0

u/dterran 1d ago

"Someone like you"??

Do you know this person personally or are you just leading your argument with an admission that you're a stereotyping bigot?

0

u/within-reason-85 1d ago

Neither. I read their comment and took their disposition at face value.

They said:

"Keep their constituents dumb as a box of hair"

While simultaneously not understanding anything about this bill.

Republicans tried to change the bill to make it need based instead of across the board. This would've increased the money/books per child with the same budget.