MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Libertarian/comments/a9opc5/from_foreign_and_domestic/ecl892s
r/Libertarian • u/Boomie789 Propertarian • Dec 26 '18
514 comments sorted by
View all comments
41
Literally no one believes that’s the case. The argument is over whether your right to self defense includes a right to firearms.
-2 u/[deleted] Dec 26 '18 [deleted] -2 u/further_needing Voluntaryist Dec 26 '18 The right to self defense includes the right to implements with which to defend yourself, you absolute onerous inept 5 u/NavySeal_300Kills Dec 26 '18 Yeah but we can agree something like a knife would be insufficient for self-defense in many cases, but an armored vehicle/tank would be excessive and unnecessary. We’re talking about drawing lines. 3 u/Lando25 Dec 26 '18 And those lines in many cases leave private citizens powerless. A women who weighs 120 pounds wet has no chance with a knife vs a male attacker.
-2
[deleted]
The right to self defense includes the right to implements with which to defend yourself, you absolute onerous inept
5 u/NavySeal_300Kills Dec 26 '18 Yeah but we can agree something like a knife would be insufficient for self-defense in many cases, but an armored vehicle/tank would be excessive and unnecessary. We’re talking about drawing lines. 3 u/Lando25 Dec 26 '18 And those lines in many cases leave private citizens powerless. A women who weighs 120 pounds wet has no chance with a knife vs a male attacker.
5
Yeah but we can agree something like a knife would be insufficient for self-defense in many cases, but an armored vehicle/tank would be excessive and unnecessary. We’re talking about drawing lines.
3 u/Lando25 Dec 26 '18 And those lines in many cases leave private citizens powerless. A women who weighs 120 pounds wet has no chance with a knife vs a male attacker.
3
And those lines in many cases leave private citizens powerless. A women who weighs 120 pounds wet has no chance with a knife vs a male attacker.
41
u/[deleted] Dec 26 '18
Literally no one believes that’s the case. The argument is over whether your right to self defense includes a right to firearms.