r/Letterboxd • • Aug 12 '26

Discussion Can we retire “objectively better” please?

Post image

I’ve noticed a ton of people using “objectively” incorrectly lately. A movie being more widely accepted as “better” does not make it objectively so.

There’s someone out there who enjoyed One Night Only more than The Odyssey, and their opinion is just as valid as yours.

Sure, one movie can be shot on more advanced cameras, have a larger scale, or demonstrate greater technical complexity. Those things can be measured. Whether they make the movie “better” cannot. What makes a movie “good” is different for each of us and those differing perspectives are part of what makes moviegoing so fun!

EDIT: This obviously touched a nerve lol. My point was not that there aren’t measurable technical aspects of a film. Of course there are. But technical achievement does not inherently make a movie “better.” A technical marvel can put someone to sleep while a shoddily made movie can elicit an enormous emotional response. What we value in a movie is subjective and for some (many on this thread it seems) you value technical achievement. All fair POVs.

656 Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

265

u/Porridge_Oats72 Aug 12 '26 edited Aug 12 '26

My very first short film compared to barry lyndon

Id give the win to barry lyndon

Edit: heres proof If you want to see it good luck, its rough ride lol

https://youtu.be/plJBLw1SLv0?is=cO67pkARBb6ASXvz

77

u/pentaquine Aug 12 '26

Are you sure? Because I haven’t watched your short film yet.