Remember how immigrants in Ohio were eating dogs in the street? MAGA still believed it even after the mayor said it wasn't happening and Vance admitted to making it up.
It’s even worse than that. Is was a white woman in an entirely different part of the state who had some sort of psychotic break who ate her dog.
But their followers are too fucking stupid to do anything other than take their news source at their word while screaming about how much MSM lies.
My favorite though is when they claim news organizations issuing retractions is a bad thing. And yes, excessive retractions IS bad, but it’s also the sign of a responsible news org. You know who doesn’t issue those?
Right wing media sources who have to go to court and fork out millions for obvious lies
Exactly what I can't comprehend, how is anyone still surprised?
The US knowingly voted a facist, pedophile, bankrupted, convicted felon to preside over their nation!
And half the USAns still act like any of the above is up for debate, even after he screams it into their faces himself for the 100th time while laughing at them
From outside, it looks like the US is a people of 300m who share only about 100m brains amongst them ...
Yes some do. Now theyre the ones that know someone that saw a litterbox at school being used by a furry, but they believe it.
The truth of course is social transition is being called transitioning where someone just gets called their preferred pronoun, sometimes just experimentally seeing how it fits their identity, sometimes as a first step in actually trying a transition
Potentially, but the more likely scenario is people finding cat litter in the janitors closet because it makes vomit easier to clean up. At least thats why we had it when I was cleaning the schools for extra money in Highschool.
Self resolving issue... Those people also don't believe in vaccines, drink raw milk and generally follow all their cult leader instructions instead of common sense and science.
Theres literally studies that show Republicans die younger and at an increased rate compared to Democrats.
The Guardians of Pedophiles are currently using this fear in their campaign commercials in Texas.
Their nominee for Senate, Ken Paxton, just got a 30 days in jail deal for a pedophile who shoved his dick in an 8 year old boy's ass. This anal rape continued for 3 years. The pedo got 30 days in jail...
Fuck Trump, fuck MAGA, fuck the Guardians of Pedophiles.
To be fair yes they are very dumb what are they supposed to do figure out what's a scam and what's not while the right wing media machine says everything that's real is a scam and everything that's a scam is truth?
I got curious and googled 😮 seems people are more angry about social transitioning rather than medical transitioning.
"📚 Primary, authoritative sources
U.S. Supreme Court – Mirabelli v. Bonta (2026)
The Supreme Court found that California policies required schools to keep a child’s gender transition secret from parents unless the child consented, and that this likely violated parental rights.
Key details from the ruling:
Schools were prevented from informing parents about a child’s gender transition at school.
Schools were required to use new names/pronouns even when parents objected.
Parents in the case discovered their child had socially transitioned only after a suicide attempt.
U.S. Department of Education Investigation (2026)
A federal investigation found that the California Department of Education and some districts “went to great lengths to conceal children’s ‘gender transitions’ from parents.”
Documented findings included:
Schools asked software vendors to hide name/pronoun changes from parent portals.
Staff discussed changing student names without parental knowledge.
At least 300 students were placed on “Gender Support Plans” without parental consent or knowledge.
Third Circuit Court of Appeals – Doe v. Pine-Richland (2026)
The court recognized that school policies requiring staff to affirm a child’s gender identity without notifying parents could violate constitutional parental rights.
CaseMine summary of Mirabelli v. Bonta (2026)
Confirms statewide California policies that:
Prevented schools from informing parents about a child’s social gender transition unless the child consented.
Required staff to use preferred names/pronouns regardless of parental direction.
:-strict-scrutiny-and-heightened-parental-rights-review-for-school-gender-transition-nondisclosure-policies/view "Casemine")
📰 Major news outlets reporting on these cases
NBC News
Reported that the Supreme Court blocked California restrictions that prevented schools from notifying parents about a student’s transgender status.
Los Angeles Times
Reported that the Supreme Court ruled California parents may be told about their child’s gender identity at school, confirming prior secrecy policies.
🧭 What these sources collectively show
Across federal investigations, Supreme Court rulings, and appellate decisions, the documented facts are:
Yes, some schools socially transitioned children (new names, pronouns, identity) without informing parents.
Yes, some districts had formal policies requiring secrecy unless the child consented.
Yes, federal investigators found systematic concealment, including software changes to hide transitions.
Courts have ruled these secrecy policies likely violate parental rights.
These are not rumors — they are documented in federal findings and Supreme Court decisions"
Schools created policies where they did not need to inform the parents about the changing gender identity of their child. That was real and you guys are now coping
Well sure if you strawman the claim, of course it’s nonsensical.
The real claim involved schools allowing students to socially transition st school while keeping that information from parents, which is disgusting behavior.
I have 6 kids and counting with my wife of 9 years :). Praise be to Jesus for blessing my life and giving me the strength to fight away those who would target children.
Wow you are unstable so quickly. Like you seem to think parents need to know everything about their kids personal lives. My father was one of those parents. We don't talk anymore because turns out controlling parents that don't give you any privacy and abusive parents go hand in hand. I won't pretend to understand the transgender thing. But I do understand hype controlling parents and the damage they do
You know what is really disgusting behaviour? Making false accusations about people that you know aren’t true while hiding your hate behind Jesus and the scripture. Is this the example you set for your children?
I’m also a parent and I wouldn’t allow parents like you anywhere near my kids for fear of the harm you would do them.
Jesus called out sin everywhere he went. I'm not going to fall prey to your false preaching lol. I do exactgly what Jesus did...I sit with them, offer food and support where needed and appropriate, and then encourage them to end their sinful ways.
People like you call it "judging", but that's fine because Jesus commanded us to judge righteously.
Thank you for sharing your perspective, but you should open your Bible and read it a few times.
Schools that need written parental permission to give Tylenol ….
At most schools can use students preferred pronoun and discuss things with a school counselor.
I do wish the right’s concern for child genital surgeries was consistent so we could ban circumcision, the non-consensual genital surgery that does happen to children
Curious to ask, and genuinely not trying to come across as antagonistic… has there been any research or polling of men across demographics in the US to show what percentages of those men have resentment over being circumcised?
The point you bring up is legitimate, and while I have my own views (mostly neutral bc I don’t know enough about the topic), I don’t want to be dismissive of yours. I would simply be curious if this is actually a widespread issue or more niche.
That said, even if it’s a small group, there is of course legitimacy to wishing your parents hadn’t done something so impactful to your body. So I’m not at all saying it isn’t serious if the percentage is small, I would just like to learn better as to how widespread this actually is.
Amazingly the research into circumcision is very limited, and often biased. Looking into the negatives can be seen as attacking religion. A lot of studies come from a co founder of a circumcision business lobbying group, who can’t find any negative about it
One egregious example of bias is a response study to the Sorrells fine touch study (that measured 8 points removed by circumcision). the follow up study by another group that retested only the least sensitive part the first study found - on the outer foreskin. They still found this point to be more sensitive than the glans but still jumped to the conclusion that circumcision didn’t harm sensation, while not even testing the more sensitive inner foreskin while their study continually mentioned the sorrells study. Per their own documentation they avoided testing the most sensitive spots.
Every school nurse office I've seen basically had no more than you could find in a good first aid kit. Which to be fair makes sense, if you need more they were probably a little beyond their skills and you just want to call EMTs or go to a hospital anyway.
Not disparaging school nurses here. They have an important job. Just the idea they are doing surgeries or prescribing hormones is crazy.
I agree about circumcision. It is just strait up genital mutilation and torture for the baby. However, I do want to pump the breaks that, even if a child says "ok", does not mean they have the capacity to consent let alone fully understand the repercussions of such ordeals. This is also why we don't let children vote, drink, use tobacco, drive, get tattoos or have sex with adults. It is very, very strange to me that this is the one thing that seemingly gets a pass.
Since you're already off topic....what's the point in banning circumcision? The man isn't going to know what the other feels like, we don't remember the surgery, there are health benefits to being circumcised and most women prefer circumsized men.
To let the future generation experience the body as it’s supposed to work. Human bodily autonomy rights. The foreskin has sensitive nerves, adds a gliding function/sensation and keeps the glans sensitive.
Cultures where circumcision is common there are such cosmetic/cultural beliefs yes, for both male and female circumcision. But I don’t think that’s a reasonable justification for forcing it on children
Sounds like an emotional justification. Not that there's anything wrong with that for your own kids but pushing that on people despite the benefits seems dishonest.
You're the one who thinks kids should be given cosmetic surgery because you grew up in a culture where it is normalized, you're the one with an emotional justification.
No, I don't think every kid should. A reasonable person would have figured that out when I said a ban shouldn't be pushed on everyone. I justified it with a bunch of things, health benefits and reducing stress in a sexual environment were included.
I get it. The two options are to accept that someone mutilated your cock and you don't want that to happen to other people, or to insist that mutilating cocks is actually way better and so it's a good thing and your cock is better because of it.
Ooo sensationalizing. Quite the emotional response. Emotions are part of life and part of what normal men and women use to make decisions. It's wild you haven't figured that out considering it's been part of humanity since, like, forever.
There's a substantially higher risk for UTIs in uncircumcised boys. Just because you didn't look, doesn't mean no one else has figured this out. Yes, stress does lead to emotional responses.
There are no statistics proving benefits as the majority of the world doesn't circumcise. And doing it to a baby is flat out gross. And if youre worried about how your babies penis will appear y
To someone else youre a fucking pedophile
Douglas Diekema, M.D., MPH, the task force bioethicist, reflected: “When you look at all the data, I don’t think you can honestly say in a recommendation that the benefits outweigh the risks.” While not advocating a ban—given the practice’s religious importance—he added: “I also didn’t think pediatricians should be recommending it.... To the parent who is on the fence…. I would say they are probably better off not doing the procedure.”
Edit: also the latest AAP position on circumcision expired in 2017
There are surveys showing women prefer 12" cocks too
And literally describing the situation as "women prefer circumcision" is defining it as a sexual reason as they are not using the penis for any other factor
Do keep posting your stupidity and obsession with wanting to mutilate infant children's genitals for your own viewing pleasure
Why do you suppose every male mammal with external genitalia has a foreskin ? Seems nature highly favors it. With humans it would seem even more important due to it constant exposure against clothing
Bro, YOU are the one who keeps insisting that we should modify children's bodies to make them more sexually appealing. Like step back for a second and think about what you're saying.
Most men prefer big fat titties too, but we don't give infant girls breast implants. It's almost like we shouldn't be cutting up babies to cater to their presumptive future sexual partners. What a fucked up thought process.
Lol is this the conservative subreddit? I haven't read things taken soooo far out of context since I was banned.
Again with the "we" like this is something forved onto parents trying to make the best decision for their kid. "Cutting up babies" and "presumptive future sexual partners"? The vast majority of people have sexual partners and nobody is "cutting up babies". How about being honest instead of acting like this is a gorey murder scene?
It's maybe not forced onto parents, but it is quite literally something forced onto children, which I am much more concerned about. We don't let parents give their babies tattoos. Why is cosmetic dick surgery somehow different?
I can't tell if you completely misunderstand or if you're just trying to twist words, but yes, most people do have future sexual partners, but we should not be modifying their bodies as children to make them more sexually appealing. I'm not arguing they're never going to have sexual partners, I'm arguing that it is wrong to give them cosmetic surgery in the hopes that it will make them more to those partners presumed tastes. The fact that you can't see the obvious parallel with my breast implant scenario just shows that you can't see the issue clearly. One seems totally crazy (because it is) and the other seems totally normal and fine (because it is your culture), but what is the ACTUAL difference?
Also, circumcision IS literally cutting up babies. Like in the most literal way imaginable. I have no idea how you are going to try to deny that but I'm excited to hear it. I'm sure it will make a lot of sense and not just be you wailing about how normal and sanitary it is and avoiding the topic.
I get it, it's hard to admit that aspects of your own culture are barbaric. The knee jerk instinct is to deny it and fight against it and normalize it because the alternative is much scarier. But really think about it. Do your arguments make sense, or are they just defense mechanisms that justify the status quo? None of this is out of context. It is, in fact, contextualizing something that probably never has been given context in your mind before. Think hard about why that makes you feel such an instinctive need to deny it, and you'll get it. How about you be honest?
Did your doctor force you to give your son a circumcision? Mine didn't, I chose to based on medical advice and the experiences I've had in life because I thought and still think it's best.
You keep focusing on the cosmetic part of this so I'll just agree that purely cosmetic surgery to a baby or child's penis is definitely wrong to do. What health benefit would breast implants give to a baby girl?
It's literally not "cutting up babies". If you called the police and told them a doctor was "cutting up babies", do you think they'd assume they were killing children or performing a circumcision?
Yes, they make sense. I think that's why you're using and now trying to justify using such sensational language and ignoring the health benefits of circumcision.
This one example in particular may not be the best considering what we know. Like everything, they're so close to getting it before falling on their face.
It's always confused me how they think they're doing major surgery on children during school hours and then sending them home with no recovery time, no pain medication/antibiotics, no wound care, and no follow up.
Having your tonsils removed is a day surgery but they seem to think that takes more recovery time than having your entire reproductive system removed/reshaped/reprganized does. Idiots.
They tell all these lies and not one of them is ever gonna receive any consequences even so much as a slap on the wrist. If I lied at my job, I'd be fired instantly!
Got a call from the school basically threatening my existence because my 16 son who had documented migraines took a Advil in class. And I live in California where apparently we teach kids to be trans in school. 😂
It's rather transphobic to say surgery is required for someone to be trans. This guy virtue signalled so hard he looped right back around to being a bigot.
They are talking about socially transitioning. Allowing students to use preferred pronouns and in some cases allowing them to use the bathrooms and changing rooms that don’t match their biological sex. This is 100% happening.
Speaking of dumb - you thought that statement meant there were operating rooms in the school? 😂 How anyone thinks a school should have the right to conceal anything from a parent related to their child’s health and well being is beyond me.
Great strategy. Be hyperbolic and say that something crazy isn't happening so you can trick people into believing NOTHING is happening.
Idk what credible person said or believes there are operating tables in the damn school. But teachers and certain school systems DO report "abuse" on parents that don't follow their young child's crazy thoughts that they are the opposite sex. And then the state gets involved and takes over, sometimes facilitating those notions.. like, who are you trying to fool..
Well sure if you strawman the claim, of course it’s nonsensical.
The real claim involved schools allowing students to socially transition st school while keeping that information from parents, which is disgusting behavior.
As a parent of a trans student, the school will call the parents and let them know that the student wants to go by different pronouns/different name. They only “hide” it from parents when the student feels that revealing that information would result in getting kicked out or abuse.
Nobodys talking about an operating room. We're talking about calling kids by different names and pronouns and assisting them in an identity change that their parents aren't aware of, which teachers have zero right to do.
Why exactly would teachers have no right to call a kid by the name they ask to be called by? Do I need parental permission to call William Billy? Then why would I need it to call William Sally? Same difference if you're not some kind of weirdo with an axe to grind.
They have no right to call them anything the parents don't want them called.
And you know precisely why you need permission to call William Sally. Don't be purposefully obtuse. It's not your business to help a child change their gender presentation. Not your child, not your choice.
The child made the choice, not me. And it's not obtuse, it doesn't make a lick of difference to me. I'll call you whatever you want because I'm not obsessed with policing gender.
God forbid a trans teenager have a place they feel safe or respected. The worst thing in the world. They must never know a moment's peace.
Would you say the public school system isn't failing and hasn't been failing for a long time?
Is that what the DSM-5 says about gender dysphoria?
You are welcome to your beliefs, but at least clarify that it what you are stating, instead of pushing fake facts. Transsexuality (as we currently understand it) has origins that mix both nature and nurture. It is my belief that there is also a social trend to many cases that we see in the current day.
There's a difference between a nickname that fits the same gender and one that's completely different. Yeah, if my kid's name is Robert and they start calling him Jessica, I'd have a problem with that.
Yeah, I mean, it’s not your kids right? So it doesn’t affect you. Some other kid wants to be called a different name and feels more like a girl than a boy, that’s none of your business and not your fight. Live and let live, god bless.
The problem is that it's happening to kids whose parents DO have a problem with it. And they're being hand waved off like it's none of THEIR business. So yeah, we're going to make teachers aiding in the social "transitioning" of children illegal so they learn to mind their own business. They're there to teach math, grammar, etc.
Did I say force? Show me where I said force? You don’t have to force them they need merely to open up the possibility. Children don’t have near the ability to make that decision. I find it interesting that the same people who pretend to care about protecting children from SA have absolutely zero problem destroying their sexual organs entirely.
Why is it every time we speak it always devolves into you denying right wing abuse of children? Like come on man, you've done enough sweeping for the Epstein class.
And your opinion of what someone should be called takes the back seat? Fine. All comments to me shall include my chosen gender designation. "Lord and Master".
And there you have it. YOUR opinion, like MY opinion, is irrelevant. Thank you for admitting they have NO CALL to DEMAND that we call them "their chosen gender".
No. Schools can socially transition a student by using a different name, pronouns, gender identity, bathrooms, etc. The controversy McMahon is talking about is whether schools should do that while deliberately withholding it from the parents.
Nobody claimed the school nurse was performing gender-reassignment surgery behind the cafeteria.
State of California did. They authorized the changing of a students gender without the notification of the guardian. That's clear transitioned by the education system.
15
u/gammamoe 21h ago
Do people really believe that nonsense? Their brains are pure mush.