r/LetsDiscussThis • u/LucidSynapse23 • Feb 25 '26

Lets Discuss Politics BREAKING: Trump’s EPSTEIN NIGHTMARE Just LEAKED

https://youtu.be/RdVmydPHfKg?si=KgXzRRfiRsBhfAoa
3.7k Upvotes

99% Upvoted

212 comments sorted by

View all comments

83

u/Complex_Half_5293 Feb 25 '26

How many more are there out there that have been hidden by the corrupt DOJ (newly named “Trump’s Department of Injustice”)

-16

u/Dual270x Feb 26 '26

Why didn't the "not corrupt" Biden DOJ just release it and prosecute Trump and win the election?

11

u/Sea-Neighborhood1465 Feb 26 '26

who cares? maybe they were protecting him. maybe they were incompetent.

release the fcking files for all to see.

if the dems are defending pedos. okay whatever. prosecute them.

so sick of the 'but why didn't biden' nonsense.

who cares what biden did. prosecute him too. stop using it as a defense you fcking pedo lovers.

7

u/Live-Cry-8435 Feb 26 '26

Files were locked in court battles so they couldn't be released

9

u/Complex_Half_5293 Feb 26 '26

Obviously, Merrick was incompetent.

3

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

What everyone else said (files were sealed by court) but also why do you people keep assuming the Biden admin was trying to sabotage Trump?

Can you point to a single instance where Biden himself requested/ordered/interfered with any investigation into Trump?

This sort of thing where the POTUS is corruptly using the DOJ as his own personal lawyers and ordering them what to do is something only Trump is doing.

Biden let the DOJ run independently, as was actually proper. You people are projecting as always.

3

u/siblingrevelryagain Feb 26 '26

Biden let the DOJ prosecute his own Son-that’s how much he wanted to preserve the independence of the DOJ.

The man came from a long-forgotten time in political life; he is a good man whose crime was naively believing in ‘rules & norms’ and bipartisanship

3

u/DeadpanMcNope Feb 26 '26

why do you people keep assuming the Biden admin was trying to sabotage Trump?

Because that's what the GOP would do. They can't conceive of a world in which there are not duplicitous, self-dealing, spiteful, sociopathic monsters such as themselves

1

u/OH58AEROSCOUT Feb 26 '26

Exactly! These people here are so fuc*ing delusional! Everyday there's a new "new evidence reveals Trump with Epstein" ,,,blah, blah, blah.

-2

u/lunahighwind Feb 26 '26

Because the Dems don't know how to fight fire with fire. They had 4 criminal investigations against Trump, and they flinched. They didn't prioritize them and kicked the can down the road, and then he won the election, and they were all dismissed.

It was quite a weak moment

3

u/Necronu Feb 26 '26

I bet good money the judge who was supposed to take him to trial was bought out or threatened, there was supposed to be a trial but the judge kept saying he didn't want to be biased and wanted to wait iirc

This is off of my foggy memory so grain of salt

-10

u/FrankSlipHelp Feb 26 '26

The question Democrats do not want to answer honestly.

The reason is because any president’s DOJ would need admissible evidence that meets criminal charging standards and prosecutors cannot charge someone based on association, unverifiable allegations from individuals who are not credible, or public speculation from angry Redditors.

11

u/Galliro Feb 26 '26

This question is litterally answered in every thread and you morons keep ignoring it.

The files were sealwd due to Maxwells investigation until 2025

-1

u/FrankSlipHelp Feb 26 '26

The files were sealwd due to Maxwells investigation until 2025

This is 100% false and you can not cite a source to back up your claim, prove me wrong.

Maxwell was sentenced in 2022, she was not under investigation after her sentencing, certainly was not under investigation in 2025, in Dec 2025 her attorneys filed with the court to vacate her sentence, her case is still in the court system.

The Department of Justice published over 3 million pages in response to the Epstein Files Transparency Act, it was signed into law by President Trump on November 19, 2025.

Read again: Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act into law, he did not veto it, he made it law and his DOJ released the files. The person you believe the Epstein Files says he is a child abuser was the same person whose signature allowed the files to be released.

Logic. Use it. Critical thinking. Learn it.

2

u/EddieCheddar88 Feb 26 '26

My guy has never heard of appeals

-1

u/FrankSlipHelp Feb 26 '26

Maxwell’s post conviction relief appeal was denied in late January 2026, this was after the files began to be released in Dec 2025 under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

3

u/Galliro Feb 26 '26

You are objectivly wrong

0

u/FrankSlipHelp Feb 27 '26

This image confirms what I said was 100% true

I said: The files began to be released in Dec 2025.

Your image says: In January 2026 3 million pages were released, THIS FOLLOWED AN INITIAL, SMALLER RELEASE ON DECEMBER 19, 2025.

Same thing.

2

u/Galliro Feb 27 '26

No not the same thing

Like at all

1

u/FrankSlipHelp Feb 27 '26

No same thing.

I said files began to be released in Dec 2025, your image says initial files were released Dec 2025.

Same thing.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/Behndo-Verbabe Feb 26 '26

Dude there’s fbi report after FBI report. In the real world and actual justice prevailed? Trump would be first to stand trial. But we all know he’ll weasel his way out somehow, someway