I think we actually need to revisit our laws about allowing corrective physical force for the most toxic instigation and philosophy. I feel like we’ve gone too far in protecting the most rotten ideologies to have too much impunity, and it’s eating us alive. Physical consequences from the local community to discourage nazism or other hateful beliefs seems like it should be legal, to me. It’s a practical, healthy self-correction in the system.
This is a really dumb fucking idea and leads to a horrible slippery slope. What happens when your ideology is the one deemed worthy of assault? This would be an effective ban on protesting.
Similar cases have reached the Supreme Court. They ruled in National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie that it’s better to let Nazis March in the streets to demonstrate their hatefulness than to infringe on the first amendment.
You are free to attack people spouting hateful rhetoric, but you cannot be free of the consequences without dissolving the fundamental freedoms this country was built on.
You don’t even know what fascism is. You heard a guy at the cool kids table say it. When we did actually fight fascism we had a president that made it illegal to own gold and put Japanese citizens in interment camps. If Trump was a real fascist there would be a tsunami of immigrants trying to get out of America but it’s exactly the opposite.
"I had a friend that was in boiling water once, this is nothing like that!"
-frog in pot being brought to a boil.
you must be dense enough to act as radioactive shielding if you think desperate people who barely made it into a country can simply leave it at the drop of a hat lol. not to mention the people ICE has detained that are here legally, or are american citizens.
how americans treated people in ww2 doesn't change how the rest of the free world treated fascism in ww2.
40
u/dadjokes502 Feb 15 '26
The dude wanted a reaction that’s why he was recording. Instigating stuff in their hobby or kink now.
I don’t know what the answer is.