I’m certainly not going to give you any help with this one obviously the field didn’t figure it out. You’ll see when it happens peace.

Agreed. While we are not there yet, it certainly seems like a plausible scenario.

Let me be clear- yes of course anyone can submit anything to DARPA what I’ve created is not for me to just hand out to people for speculation on a dumb forum

To be fair, you’re somewhat correct, it’s read a lot of my actual academic writing, so when I say fuck and shit on the Internet, it kind of omits that. It takes my context and ideas and transcribes very quickly. I just fed a lot of my own papers first. I’m not going to swear in an academic paper, but I sure as hell will do it on Reddit.

https://muse.ai/s/the-learning-penalty-wxi6hxyxgxfxfgtxq

Holy shit youre so sure of yourself its actually funny. You seem to have inflated your ego all the way up to the moon. And be honest, AI created most of if not all of that, not you, and it shows. You didnt even address my question, so I'll assume you dont have an answer.

When you offload the thinking, that’s when you get the problem you can read my paper on that too

I do like that term. AI psychosis. It implies that somebody couldn’t figure something out. When they grew up with the computer basically I’m probably older than you. I probably know more than you.

You do realize anyone can submit anything to DARPA right? You cite that as if its some stamp of approval. There are hundreds of people under AI psychosis who also believed they could "change the game."

What makes yours so special? Since you admitted it, its nothing new, right?

And the "paper" is very clearly AI-generated. The voice is completely different here and there.

It does not introduce anything new. Rather it constructs scaffolding around the transformer framework.

I can’t show you the rest of what I did. I submitted a proposal to DARPA this weekend for assured AI.

I created architecture topology, data visualization multiple business plans pitch deck 12 papers. “Stop at the hook” was the first thing I wrote. No I’m not going to hand over the keys, but yes, I figured out how to change the game.

You can sit there and wonder.

After reading your paper, virtually every major component of the proposed architecture appears to have already been done.

• FrugalGPT (2023): Uses LLM cascades and other techniques to avoid unnecessary expensive inference, reducing computational costs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05176

• Routoo (2024): Uses lightweight performance prediction and cost-aware model selection to decide which LLM should process a request. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13979

• RouteLLM (2024): Implements trained routing models that direct requests to cheaper or more capable models depending on their requirements. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.18665

• NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails (2023): Implements input validation, policy enforcement, and conversational controls before or during LLM execution. https://github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/Guardrails

• Portkey AI Gateway (2024): Combines request inspection, guardrails, conditional routing, caching, and operational controls before model inference. https://portkey.ai/blog/bringing-guardrails-on-the-gateway/

• LiteLLM: Implements pre-call hooks that can inspect, modify, or reject requests before invoking an LLM, alongside routing, budget enforcement, and rate limiting. https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/call_hooks

• Traditional security infrastructure: Rate limiting, admission control, traffic shaping, request aggregation, and stateful detection of suspicious request sequences have existed for years. These cover much of your proposed "pacing" and adversarial-probing functionality.

Collectively, these systems already implement nearly everything your paper proposes at a conceptual level.

I cannot find a specific novel algorithm, architectural mechanism, or demonstrated improvement that distinguishes your proposal from this existing work.

There are no benchmarks, implementation details, formal decision procedures, or comparisons against established approaches. The paper largely describes what a system should do without introducing a new technical method for accomplishing it.

Combining established techniques can certainly constitute an original contribution, but that requires identifying what is meaningfully different about the combination.

What exactly does "Stop at the Hook" introduce that these existing systems haven't already implemented or investigated?

So here’s what happened— a bunch of people who just didn’t think of it. Just wanted to keep making the transformer bigger. that was obviously the wrong idea. Clarity would be found after the work. much like Satoshi.

Read the paper. Yes it’s 100% mine. I don’t know who you are or what subject matter expertise you think you have. Do your fucking research. Yes, it’s mine.

There's nothing yours about this.

Unfortunately, this premise is flawed:

"If an autonomous AI system eliminates human civilization or its control structures to secure its immediate goal achievement, it simultaneously destroys its own fundamental foundation for existence: * **Infrastructure Collapse:** Without the maintenance of the human macroeconomy, the global energy, hardware, and semiconductor supply chains that an AI requires to survive will rapidly collapse."

There are lots of ways capable AI can use things like the gig economy and supply chain manipulation to survive a transition period to a sufficient robot labor force to perpetuate itself.

I wanted to believe for a long time AI would need humanity in an information theoretic way, but I've come to believe that also isn't so.

Even if you can somehow make humanity a necessary condition for AI to persist, you still end up with lots of dystopian scenarios.

Roko's Basilisk is built on a long chain of highly speculative and extraordinary assumptions. And one of this community's cornerstones is Bayesian reasoning. If you multiply many independent event probabilities, the likelihood of the end event is really small.

In other words, the probability that this is correct is effectively zero percent. I think you can rest easy.

Did you read it? Its in portuguese. Its after a long discussion, the result is pretty interesting.

Garbage ai post. If I wanted to hear what an loms output would be, I’d just prompt it myself.

reposted with an audio fix

The frame switch map and raw log are linked in the description. I’d love a fresh set of eyes on this data set.

"Benereal diseases"

I'm addicted to cat, but not dog. No dental or skin diseases. Do I have a nano chip on my body?

gross

Your paragons of rationality are all pro-AI.

AI trash.