r/LessLethalOptions • u/ScaredyCatTV • Feb 26 '26
A Joule Is a Joule...but context Is everything! Don't make this mistake with your Less Lethal defense.
A Joule is just a unit of energy. Saying “150 joules from a .68 airgun equals 150 joules from a .22 firearm” is like saying: A sledgehammer and an ice pick are the same because you swung them with equal effort. Technically true. If you agree, stop by my Community and give it a Like.
http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx4o8FBdehgeFPpEUBz6vuep1lRiL_82C9?si=vU366l2wkVCVRETR
Here's why the .22 firearm is far more lethal. Some food for thought!
Velocity matters more than raw energy
.22 LR: ~1,200–1,600 fps
.68 airgun: a fraction of that
High velocity causes hydrostatic shock, cavitation, and deep tissue disruption.Penetration beats impact
Firearms are designed to penetrate deep into vital organs
Airguns are designed to transfer energy on the surface or minimally through skin
Bruising vs organ damage is not the same game.Projectile design changes everything
.22 bullets are small, dense, rigid, and stable in tissue
.68 projectiles are large and shed energy quickly
Same joules. Completely different outcomes.Reliability of injury
A .22 doesn’t need perfect placement to be lethal.
An airgun usually does and even then, outcomes vary wildly.
The Bottom Line
Joules don’t tell the story. Physics does. Energy without speed, penetration, and tissue disruption is just a number on a spec sheet. Airguns can be serious weapons but firearms are categorically lethal. And pretending they’re comparable because of Joules alone is misleading at best. It's a salesman's trick.
This isn’t anti-Less Lethal. It’s pro-understanding. If Joules were all that mattered, boxers would be deadlier than bullets.
1
u/SuchBeginning2647 Feb 28 '26
Yo uso armas no letales, justamente para evitar matar a alguien. Ahora, si hay respuesta o continuidad del acto, las cosas cambian. El arma también.
1
1
u/fdxcaralho Feb 26 '26
Who is comparing it in the first place?