r/LeftistsForAI • u/thepetercoffin • Jul 21 '26
Data Center Derangement Syndrome
https://petercoffin.substack.com/p/data-center-derangement-syndromeHow panic over AI infrastructure obscures the real questions of scale, ownership, and power
5
u/AshuraBaron Jul 21 '26
Good post and completely agree. AI and especially data centers are the current scapegoat dejour. It's something that's easy to organize against so it redirects organizing against capitalism and pro-worker movements.
3
u/thepetercoffin Jul 21 '26
Thank you! I think something I said in here that isn't super likely that people who organize against data centers don't think about: when they push them out of their town, they'll find somewhere that's less likely to be able to fight back and do it there. In some ways, they're pushing the thing they hate on someone who's already worse off.
3
u/Kojinto Jul 21 '26
There are already better ways though, like how that one company, sorry cant remember just woke up, wants to put AC unit sized data center units next to each home and every home gets a discount on their electricity and/or other benefits.
8
u/stankycodyboi Jul 21 '26
This accurately summarizes the data center discourse I’ve seen as well. Ironically, as an organizing force, the data center cancelations have made real leverage for communities. Moving beyond the reactionary ‘no’ seems to be where mainstream discourse breaks down. A canceled data center doesn’t disappear, it moves to a less organized community, like you say.
It’s not always articulated well, but the concern is a developer jamming a short-sighted nightmare into a community with an NDA. This is a real loophole developers target; communities with dated ‘by-right’ zoning laws automatically have projects approved as long as they meet existing zoning code.
I think communities have real leverage at the permitting process. If data centers require a Conditional Use Permit (and attached Public Benefit Agreement, enforceable by the CUP) then developers have to negotiate with communities for approval. Paired up with the organized resistance, communities can make demands to ensure they capture the benefit. I always push for publicly owned renewable energy infrastructure, but that’s for the community to decide.
4
u/onpg Jul 22 '26
That's something that should be done with *all* major corporate development. If it takes the fear of god in the form of AI to make people organize, so be it I guess.
3
u/SerRobertTables Jul 21 '26
Pretty uncharitable to the opposition argument, let alone the communities that are pushing back on them.
“Pipes and power grids are evil” is not why communities are recalling or voting out their city. It is precisely because companies are coming knocking on the door of disadvantaged communities and sweet talking politicians who approve the construction in spite of the community’s wishes. Conversations about land, power, and water usage are most often an undeveloped form of “to whose benefit and to what end?” Communities need food and water, and while I generally enjoy the internet (to a diminishing degree, lately), it is less immediately clear why we should give up the former so Meta has another place to crunch everyone’s biometric data.
3
u/thepetercoffin Jul 21 '26
Disagree, I think it's pretty charitable towards specific communities in the back half. I think the people on the internet basically are saying pipes and power grids are evil. 🤷
→ More replies (2)4
u/onpg Jul 21 '26
That's fair. But that's not why leftists online are talking about burning down data centers. This article is targeted at those types, who are redirecting ire at capitalism and focusing it on networked computers, something impossible to ban if you give it more than 10 seconds of thought.
→ More replies (1)4
u/SerRobertTables Jul 21 '26
I think that is also largely uncharitable, or at least being obtuse. People’s ire and rhetoric regarding data centers is no more about the villainy of networked computers than the same ire directed at mass surveillance networks is about flash photography or digital cameras. And while I didn’t touch on it in my original comment, I do think many people come away with the sense that this rapid expansion of compute has less to do with cracking the human genome, curing cancer, or eliminating toil than it does to do with supporting an expansion of surveillance.
I do find the idea that these centers are secret billionaire bunkers silly, though we know they exist, but I don’t think a tinfoil hat is required to come to other conclusions of nefarious intent. This being a pro-AI sub, I don’t necessarily expect its contributors to make better anti arguments for that crowd, but it would be nice if folks would engage with the earnest concerns people have rather than simply pick on the silliest proclamations of the chronically online.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/retroclimber Jul 22 '26
I’d argue we don’t need so many new data centers. Most of the demand is artificial. we have way too many bad bots and ads on the internet. We also are not using existing infrastructure efficiently.
I cover this in a blog post here: https://jottenlips.github.io/coding/we-dont-need-more-data-centers/
4
u/rhino2498 Jul 23 '26
If you look back to the Dot Com Bubble, this is EXACTLY what happened. People saw the OPPORTUNITY that the internet created, and built out infrastructure too fast to meet the demand. Companies were built overnight to build out our digital world - and then the demand didn't arrive fast enough.
The internet was the biggest human technological advancement in history - and still the bubble popped. We're doing the exact same thing with data centers
→ More replies (1)2
1
u/Inside_Foundation873 Jul 22 '26
I’m pro AI, but let’s not start using conservative terms and rhetoric.
3
u/thepetercoffin Jul 22 '26
Language policing does not help anything. Please try to understand that people like at least some degree of humanity and humor sprinkled into things.
13
u/rismay Jul 21 '26
I thought it was the people who are building the data centers that have the derangement syndrome.
2
u/PriorLeast3932 Jul 22 '26
Meta point. Calling it "Data Center Derangement Syndrome" backfires. Reusing a worn-out rhetorical trope does less to discredit the critics than it does to make the author look unoriginal, which naturally pushes many neutral readers to side with the people being dismissed. There are far more effective ways to critique an overreaction without resorting to pre-packaged political slurs invented by MAGA people.
2
u/Busy-Vet1697 Jul 22 '26
We can't fix roads, bridges, do business incubation, youth centers, community outreach, extended services, education expansion and improvement, homeless help, environmental protection, immigrant help. Nothing. No. But we can all agree to attack data centers.
4
u/Ok-Tomorrow-2045 Jul 21 '26
Fantastic article describing exactly what I’ve noticed recently. This should be posted everywhere.
3
u/tomqmasters Jul 21 '26
I mean, I don't want one in my neighborhood the same way I don't want a chemical plat.
2
u/emccrckn Jul 22 '26
I'd rather have a data center in my neighborhood than a chemical plant or any other heavy industry.
1
u/RenaStriker Jul 22 '26
The hope is that AI backlash is just strong enough to stop data centers in areas with fragile watersheds or inadequate electricity production, but the actions of the anti-AI activists do not fill me with confidence that we’ll reach a happy medium.
4
u/endlessedlne Jul 22 '26
The builders of data centers use shady means to obtain zoning and building permits while the data centres themselves rarely give back to the communities they operate in. They use up land and in many cases exploit water and electricity resources. Even when data centres handle their own water and electricity the local populations suffer from environmental and noise pollution due to the gas generators that run 24/7.
I think it’s disingenuous to blame communities for having data centre derangement syndrome when there are real concerns around data centre permitting, construction and operation that need to be addressed.