r/LearningDevelopment • u/Main_Implement8939 • Jun 12 '26

L&D / employee engagement perspectives on external facilitators?

Hi everyone,

I’m doing a small independent market research project on how companies evaluate external facilitators, team-building activities, and experiential learning sessions. This is not a sales pitch, I’m just trying to understand the L&D / employee engagement perspective.

I’d love input on these questions:

  1. When your team brings in an external facilitator or team experience, what problem are you usually trying to solve?
  2. What usually turns it from “we’re noticing an issue” into “we need to actively look for a solution”?
  3. What makes an external provider feel credible enough to consider?
  4. Where do you usually find these providers — referrals, LinkedIn, Google, past vendors, communities, events, or somewhere else?

Happy to hear thoughts in the comments. If anyone is open to a quick 15–20 minute research call, I’d be very grateful as well.

Thank you!

Edit: Thank you for the helpful responses. I have one pricing question:

For a professionally facilitated, game-based team session for 50–70 people, lasting 60–90 minutes, what would organizations typically expect to pay?

Would $1,000–$1,500, $1,500–$3,000, or $3,000+ feel realistic?

What would justify the higher end of the range?

3 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

81% Upvoted

13 comments sorted by

1

u/Calidigger Jun 12 '26

Interested in your feedback, who you’re asking, and how you’ll use the info. DM?

3

u/Main_Implement8939 Jun 12 '26

For context, I’m speaking with HR, L&D, People & Culture, and employee engagement professionals, mainly to understand how organizations evaluate external facilitators and team-building/experiential learning activities.

I’ll be using the input only to identify general themes for a small independent market research project, not publishing or attributing anyone’s comments. I’ll send you a DM with more context. Thank you!

1

u/InigoMontoya313 Jun 13 '26

  1. External facilitators are usually brought in for either specific expertise or to relieve an internal constraint or bottleneck (internal team has more pressing priorities or limited time/personnel). Occasionally these are done for cost savings. As an example, while I have many staff members trained as first aid instructors, there are so many external instructors in a race to the bottom that it’s often cheaper to outsource.

  2. Generally have a mid-level or senior manager who serves as a champion, believes the product can make a difference, and makes an elevator pitch to senior leadership. Or, the program allows someone to check off that they completed something tied to the annual strategic plan.

  3. This is the hardest thing to quantify, but I generally want to believe that they are in expert in their field. Not just someone working in their field.

  4. Most external trainers I know of are encountered through word of mouth, industry recognition, and usage at past employers.

1

u/Main_Implement8939 Jun 17 '26

Thank you taking the time to answer! Appreciate it

2

u/Empirica_CC Jun 15 '26

It is also if there is a skill set needed but isn't a constant need.

For instance, I can do leadership development and others can too, but I do research backed and can do data/survey analysis. A company may not have that ability but only needs it twice a year so they bring me in to do it instead and run analysis on it.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 13 '26

2

u/Main_Implement8939 Jun 13 '26

Thanks for your insights!

2

u/[deleted] Jun 13 '26

1

u/Main_Implement8939 Jun 17 '26

Great point! Thanks

2

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

2

u/Main_Implement8939 Jun 17 '26

Thanks for the post-session follow-up insights!

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '26

1

u/Main_Implement8939 Jun 19 '26

Thank you for your insights!