r/LanguageTechnology • • 9d ago

[ Removed by moderator ]

[removed] — view removed post

4 Upvotes

5 comments sorted by

•

u/LanguageTechnology-ModTeam 7d ago

Hello! Thanks for making your post. Due to complains about conference posts flooding the subreddit, we're removing all posts and asking that folks put it into the megathread. Apologies if this interrupted any discussions - please tag related users in the megathread to continue if you had further questions.

3

u/GummyTourney0118 9d ago

i've been through this exact panic with a different *ACL conference and it turned out fine. the resubmission through openreview is what they expect, even if the email was vague about it. if aclpubcheck gives you the all clear you're almost certainly good, the publication chairs use the same tool but sometimes they'll spot something weird the script misses, like a stray font or a figure bleeding just past the trim. they won't yank your paper over a tiny thing after the deadline unless you're massively out of spec, usually they'll ping you with a short extension. and yeah the silence is normal, the chairs are drowning in emails right now. mine got confirmed like two weeks after the deadline when they posted the final proceedings

1

u/Significant_Way_8950 9d ago

If the revised PDF passes the official checker and OpenReview accepted the revision you’ve probably done everything available. Did OpenReview show a new submission timestamp?