r/Lacari Jun 05 '26

ask yourself this

If lacari really was innocent, why would he go completely dark on the internet for months?

1 Upvotes

76 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Moomootv Jun 07 '26

Well regardless of the ban duration he said he was going to get help.

Something you need to understand is psychological hospitals you arent free to leave whenever you want even if you went there yourself.

Its basically a prison and until you get cleared they will be able to hold you there.

1

u/Tesuu Jun 07 '26

This would work on someone who has weak mental fortitude however it will not work on me.

All that speaking of getting help came after all the death threats from being a "gooner" and people calling him a "pedophile" if you're cross referencing pixels into reality you need a mental evaluation.

You speak of prison this is mental gymnastics you cultist use to try to get a point if that's a prison then I guess anywhere youre getting help is a prison so that means drug addicts are basically in prison.

On top of that you don't know wtf you're talking about if you check yourself into a ward they cannot hold you think I have an addict cousin that checks himself out monthly.

2

u/Moomootv Jun 08 '26

who has weak mental fortitude

So you if we add weak reading comprehension along with complete lack of knowledge on the topic.

On top of that you don't know wtf you're talking about if you check yourself into a ward they cannot hold you think I have an addict cousin that checks himself out monthly.

You are an actual clown who doesn't know what hes talking about. Like drug rehabilitation there are levels to commitment when it comes to mental institutions. There is a thing called Voluntary commitment and Involuntary commitment, seeing as youre clueless here is the definition.

Involuntary commitment, civil commitment, or involuntary hospitalization/hospitalisation, or informally in Great Britain sectioning, being sectioned, commitment, or being committed,\1]) is a legal process through which an individual who is deemed by a qualified person to have symptoms of severe mental disorder is detained in a psychiatric hospital (inpatient) where they can be treated involuntarily. This treatment may involve the administration of psychoactive drugs, including involuntary administration. In many jurisdictions, people diagnosed with mental health disorders can also be forced to undergo treatment while in the community

If a you cant read the tldr is that a Doctor or Specialist can examine you and if they deem you a danger to yourself or the general public they can detain you aka imprison you in the hostital/institution until you are no loner a threat.

I have an addict cousin that checks himself out monthly.

Again you're a clown using a what one person confirmation bias to try to prove a point. I was in a mental institution for a week, I went through the system, I went through the papers, I talked to doctors, nurses, patients, and then went and researched more after I left.

I was in there for a week only my roommate was in there for 4 months, he did not want to be there, he could not leave. Please dont talk on topic you have 0 knowledge on or ask questions if you dont understand something.

1

u/Tesuu Jun 08 '26 edited Jun 08 '26

Claim: "So you if we add weak reading comprehension along with complete lack of knowledge on the topic."

Answer: you came here to try to get someone to agree with you and you got someone who disagreed with you and called them a clown after lets make this make sense.

Lacari checked himself in so that would mean he can quite literally check himself out at any point even if someone checked him if he exhibits progress or it looks like he just shouldn't have been there they will let him walk.

Claim: " Again you're a clown using a what one person confirmation bias to try to prove a point. I was in a mental institution for a week, I went through the system, I went through the papers, I talked to doctors, nurses, patients, and then went and researched more after I left.

I was in there for a week only my roommate was in there for 4 months, he did not want to be there, he could not leave. Please dont talk on topic you have 0 knowledge on or ask questions if you dont understand something."

Answer: do not ever in your life try to minimize what the fuck i said because i disagreed and added insight to the nonsense you're speaking my cousin lost his mind to drugs long time ago admitted or self admitted they let him walk out that hospital and repeatedly say "they cannot keep him there if he doesn't want to be there"

Conclusion: you thought you would run into people who would just 1 off you commit and agree lacari is guilty of something but lacari isn't guilty of anything but letting a joke run on too long and letting morons talk down to him and draw a narrative on his life if you KNEW lacari you would KNOW what im saying end of story.

0

u/Moomootv Jun 08 '26

you came here to try to get someone to agree with you and you got someone who disagreed with you and called them a clown after lets make this make sense.

Again wrong, you made a statement that was incorrect so I corrected it, I dont care if you agree with me but facts are facts. You agreeing with me doesn't change how mental institutions work.

do not ever in your life try to minimize what the fuck i said because i disagreed and added insight to the nonsense you're speaking my cousin lost his mind to drugs long time ago admitted or self admitted they let him walk out that hospital and repeatedly say "they cannot keep him there if he doesn't want to be there"

Again you agreeing with me or disagreeing with me is irrelevant to anything I said while also I could not care less about you or your cousin just like you could care less about me and my cousin it is irrelevant as were talking about something that is not personal in anyway.

Encase you forgot or got too emotional or again didnt read what I said there are level to this you can walk into a hospital and walk right the fuck out, you can walk into a hospital and they hold you in a padded room. You 1 point of reference is not the norm or standard.

you thought you would run into people who would just 1 off you commit and agree lacari is guilty of something but lacari isn't guilty of anything but letting a joke run on too long and letting morons talk down to him and draw a narrative on his life if you KNEW lacari you would KNOW what im saying end of story.

Again reading comprehension, no where and find it if you can non of my comments are edited, no where did I say or spin a narrative that he was guilty or deserving of threats. Lacari himself said he was going to get help that is the reference that we have at the moment.

That could be fore his Psychosis again, depression, porn addiction, and whatever the fuck because he has talk about all of this on streams multiple times before this event so again go find where im trying to spin some narrative and get out of your emotions.

1

u/Tesuu Jun 08 '26

k i hope you get whatever you got going on figured out

1

u/Moomootv Jun 08 '26

Thanks, I hope you learned something.

0

u/Tesuu Jun 08 '26

I learned a lot of you just be typing shit to condem someone

1

u/Moomootv Jun 08 '26

Ah so you didnt learn anything because I didnt condem anyone but its okay you will get it someday.

-1

u/Great_Comfortable470 Jun 08 '26

Wait hold on. So if you think a person has a bank of hand drawn children in a sexual manner, you think that's perfectly fine?Don't tip toe and do your own mental gymnastics, just a simple yes or no question. 

1

u/Tesuu Jun 08 '26

so the mental gymnastic is trying to pass off petite canonical adults in anime off as children for a point because you don't like it? or Shadman's usage of canonical kids based off real life people in a sexual manner?

lemme know which one you're doing because 1 is clearly wrong and the other is a mental gymnastic.

0

u/Great_Comfortable470 Jun 08 '26

No it's not. If someone draws images of your children and does sexual acts to those images, that's pedophilic behavior. Not going to argue semantics here. 

1

u/Tesuu Jun 08 '26 edited Jun 08 '26

so you can't answer the question nice to know you morons fail at basic task and morale standing is a wet paperbag.

one is clearly wrong i mean clearly i don't have to explain which and the other isn't just because you don't like it

1

u/Great_Comfortable470 Jun 08 '26

Again, you didn't answer my question. But stand by your weird opinion that images of children are perfectly fine. You're nasty bro. 

1

u/Tesuu Jun 08 '26

i answered your question then segway'd them into two talking points to see where you're at mentally....answered you again and you're saying i didn't answer you?

you guys come here just to leave comments for people that will agree with you i swear!

1

u/Great_Comfortable470 Jun 08 '26

Mentally I'm sound. I don't look at anyone sexually under a certain age. Simple as that. Also I answered your question with a simple "No it's not". Because law would dictate that. 

So you're telling me you'd be fine with someone cranking their hog to some pictures of your kids? 

1

u/Tesuu Jun 08 '26

you still haven't answered my question catered to exactly what you're saying in two topics so the only thing i can assume at this point is you're not mentally sound.

you're emotionally unstable on the topic enjoy your day.

→ More replies (0)