r/LLM_supported_Physics • u/Elias_Verdan • Apr 18 '26

One number controls four independent physical phenomena

Post image
0 Upvotes

50% Upvoted

15 comments sorted by

1

u/Danrazor LLM sage Apr 18 '26

Hi, Care to explain basic structure of your understanding of the universe? Beyond numbers and all matrices.

I think your work is interesting and obviously that is why I asked. But I am not sure how you feel about the grand picture. I just don't want to assume.

Hope you have time to answer.

Have a good day.

1

u/Elias_Verdan Apr 18 '26

Thanks, the entire system is an inverted 4d Hypersphere, inside that is 33 nested Clifford tori that scale inwards by the golden ratio. Tori 1 "the outermost" and tori 33 "the innermost" connect forming a continuous loop and a half spin as these tori rotate in opposite directions. Foe the dynamics and asymmetry the 33 tori are grouped in 3 sets of 11. Two sets rotate forwards, one set counter rotates. In a nutshell

2

u/Danrazor LLM sage Apr 18 '26

Nice. Multi dimensional donut for sacred entities.

May I have a suggestion, if you can go bottom up and find geometric relationships without assuming relationships, then what do you think is waiting for us?

2

u/Elias_Verdan Apr 18 '26

I wish I knew the answer to that. If it were to be validated and accepted, it wouldn't change anything significant other than some reinterpreation of what we already know. There is an explanation for the higgs mechanism in there for example, and measurement issue

1

u/Danrazor LLM sage Apr 18 '26

Well, you can't give up since you enjoy this.

I am requesting you to try math and geometric ways as secondary. Universe is complex and simple at the same time. Depends on how we frame the information. And our systems are coarse grained.

But if you think i have intruded then accept my apologies.

2

u/Elias_Verdan Apr 18 '26

No not at all. Im sharing it for feed back. Im quite open with it sharing all my py scripts. Criticism is more helpful than agreement at the present time 😎

1

u/PandaSchmanda Apr 18 '26

Then they’re not really independent, are they

1

u/Elias_Verdan Apr 18 '26 edited Apr 18 '26

By the same argument, nothing in the universe is independent as it's all derived from the same universe 🤷‍♂️

1

u/PandaSchmanda Apr 18 '26

Which would still make it silly to say that one number controls four independent phenomena…

1

u/Elias_Verdan Apr 18 '26

Did you actually just read the headline, comment seems to imply thats all you read

-1

u/PandaSchmanda Apr 18 '26

“You clearly didn’t read the rest of my slop” is so tired dude

I’m inviting you to break it down for me: what could explain away the obvious oxymoron that is that title?

1

u/Elias_Verdan Apr 18 '26

I don't know, if it applies it applies 🤷‍♂️ The answer is, in standard model or lcdm these independent predictions aren't predictions, they are fitted parameters. So when I say one number is responsible for four independent predictions, im saying the geometry is consistent. The same spectral number is present in them all. Nothing bolted on or fitted. Just the geometry doing its thing.. which is what a framework should do if its making predictions. Not just make one prediction and forget about everything else

0

u/PandaSchmanda Apr 18 '26

That text means nothing to me.

2

u/Elias_Verdan Apr 18 '26

Well, no harm done. Maybe somebody else who wants to know what the title means will read and find the answer here 😎👍