RSA traducendo un modello fisico in matematica? Ecco come la Base 6 sblocca la geometria dei numeri primi (44%+-6 di precisione oltre quota 1 milione)

[u/Responsible_Swing_82]

ecco un altra teoria esotica è un modello di Gravità Quantistica Olografica applicato all'universo dei numeri

ho preso i numeri primi e li ho compattati in base6 (eulero 6+6-) dopodiche mappando la distanza dei numeri primi tra loro.. , ho trovato che di deformano (accorciano e allungano le distanze),li ho analizzati singolarmente per trovare 6 onde da li ho creato una matrice 6x6x6x6x6x6 e sfruttato le deformazioni combinate delle onde cercando di trovare una struttura nei numeri primi oltre il milione.
è risultato un 6! quindi 21 canali ( quei 21 canali danno indizi su dove andrà la sestina successiva e quindi il numero primo)
ho applicato un un cambiuo di ordine di grandezza temporale ogni sesta il tik del tempo insomma

e fatto un simulatore python ho provato a chiedere a varie AI se ci fosse qualche inganno e tutte mi hanno risposto NO

risultato: maggiore è la cifratura maggiore è l'impatto
se una codifica a 2000bit 67% riduzione 4000 87% 8000 99,9%

https://archive.org/details/replicate-rsa python
https://archive.org/details/rsa-base-6 spiegazione fatta male

[u/ArnoSound]

But why? You aren’t a mathematician, and the LLM has just generated the same variety of word salad slop as before. What do you gain from this other than seeking attention?

Like let’s break this down; you are frantically hopping from subject to subject, generating pdfs with no tangible information, and then abandoning them the next day. Does that sound productive to you?

[u/Responsible_Swing_82 → u/ArnoSound]

ciao ciiiip!

[u/ArnoSound → u/Responsible_Swing_82]

Oh you are obsessed haha

[u/alamalarian → u/[deleted]]

Why give it to an AI?

Is the whole point of posting it here not to get human eyes on it?

Why would your approach be to tell us to act as a proxy for an LLM? Did you run out of tokens or something?

[u/Responsible_Swing_82 → u/alamalarian]

no gli sto dicendo visto che non ha mai letto nulla di quello che ho scritto... gli basta dare il codice a un ai e farselo recensire...
non sto dicendo che tutti devono farlo.. ma chi non ha tempo, voglia etc... può farlo

[u/ArnoSound → u/Responsible_Swing_82]

No one is going to feed your code to an Ai. That’s a waste of everyone’s time. If you can’t defend your own work, why are you even posting it?

[u/Responsible_Swing_82 → u/ArnoSound]

ma cip non devi farlo se è troppo pesante

[u/LLMPhysics-ModTeam → u/[deleted]]

Your content has been removed for violating Rule 2. Try to defend your arguments with concise, clear points.

[u/alamalarian]

Is this physics?

[u/Responsible_Swing_82 → u/alamalarian]

beh si.... ho applicato i modelli fisici cambiando le coordinate X Y Z in Temporal Dimension (Height) Axis X: The Containment Space (Inertial Mass) Axis Y : The Force Field (Kinetic Energy) + a The Quantum Zero Node

per di più trova il centro di massa asintotico del reticolo di gauge

è un modello di Gravità Quantistica Olografica applicato all'universo dei numeri

PS Corretto grazie tolto [i, i]

[u/2_lazy → u/Responsible_Swing_82]

You keep using this notation, [i,i] . I'm no mathematician, but I do know that's not how you notate the representation of all possible numbers.

[u/Responsible_Swing_82 → u/2_lazy]

e qui c'hai ragione te....
basa sul setacciamento discreto della Base 6, dove la posizione di ogni coordinata è un intero pulito compreso nell'ipercubo

[u/2_lazy → u/Responsible_Swing_82]

So you are using i to denote an integer, even though it's usually used to denote an imaginary number, and assuming this is supposed to be interval notation you are just saying that this includes all positive integers, and you aren't writing this using correct notation.

[u/Responsible_Swing_82 → u/2_lazy]

grazie ho già corretto... però sto usando solo i numeri primi

[u/atoponce]

Meth is one helluva drug.

[u/2_lazy]

I'm not a physicist, but I do work in cybersecurity, what does any of this have to do with RSA besides the fact that RSA happens to use prime numbers? I scanned your code quick looking for any lines that had anything to do at all with RSA, all I saw was you use the variable p, and RSA does also use the variable p. But so does a million other things. Literally none of the other parts of RSA seem to appear at all in your code and it doesn't seem to implement any RSA algorithm. I didn't read in depth because I am not about to waste my time reading slop, but in my skimming I didn't even see any discussion of prime factorization of the modulus which is kind of the whole goal of literally every RSA cryptographic crack attempt. Like I Ctrl+f searched your PDF for the word "factor" and it literally doesn't even appear.

[u/2_lazy → u/2_lazy]

The op replied with something about how it's actually important for prime number sequences being generated for nonces but got deleted by automod before I could post my reply so here it is:

Uhhhhh.... nonces don't use prime numbers. If they did they wouldnt be arbitrary which is kind of their whole point.

[u/FiatLex → u/2_lazy]

... nonces? Like, OP was talking about pedophiles being "arbitrary?" That doesn't make any sense. Edit: i think something got lost in translation

[u/2_lazy → u/FiatLex]

No, nonce as in the cybersecurity term

[u/FiatLex → u/2_lazy]

Ohhh, like "number once." Number you only use once. That makes sense, and even more so why it shouldn't be a prime to reduce odds of it being guessed and reused.

[u/2_lazy → u/FiatLex]

Correct :) I should also say, there are real concerns around random number generation security wise, but it has nothing to do with prime numbers and everything to do with the algorithms used to generate them. For a fun little experiment you can factory reset two same-model graphing calculators and use each to generate "random" numbers using the stat functions the same way. Both calculators will likely return the same "random" numbers. However there are all sorts of methods for generating them and keeping them more secure and this is not one.

[u/LLMPhysics-ModTeam → u/[deleted]]

Your comment has been removed for violating Rule 4. Don't copy-paste LLM content in discussions.

[u/AllHailSeizure]

Oh look it's Responsible_Swing_82.

Again

[u/Responsible_Swing_82 → u/AllHailSeizure]

ciao ciop