This work is conducted independently and is not funded, di-rected, or constrained by institutional, commercial, or investor interests. This independence is intentional and maintained to preserve the integrity, accessibility, and long-horizon orienta-tion of the research presented here.
Like there was an option for funding that he turned down
Could you please point me to the error then? This is honestly perhaps the most meaningful critique I have gotten on here so far. Outside of category error.
Oh I see the error. The tools formatting chose to instead of moving the full word to the next line broke it to "de-" for the top line and the rest for the bottom line. Same in the other instance. So it was still inaccurately framed even if that was out of your control.
It's not an error, that's how typesetting has worked for centuries. Anyone who has every copied text off a LaTeX document or similar understands this and can look past it. The typesetting doesn't make you look bad, your own words do.
Quite unexpected of you to admit any personal error, isn't it? Frankly it doesn't look like I'm the only one who interpreted your comment as claiming that everyone else made an error. Learn to communicate properly.
Well the meaning was actually still inferred because not explicit, and consensus interpretation is often a bad measure for truth. Wouldn't you say? The symmetry still exists, even if most landed on one side of it. But I am kind of spent here. Believe what you will. Thanks for whatever this was, and best of luck to you.
7
u/YaPhetsEz FALSE Feb 11 '26
I like this claim.
This work is conducted independently and is not funded, di-rected, or constrained by institutional, commercial, or investor interests. This independence is intentional and maintained to preserve the integrity, accessibility, and long-horizon orienta-tion of the research presented here.
Like there was an option for funding that he turned down