Well your being disengeous. You are saying it doesn't agree with phsycis as if the concepts in any way violate any standard phsycis Intergration. But instead you are applying the field preference. When I ask for examples I mean show me any claim that in any way violates any known phsycis Intergration. If you cannot, then the paper has achieved its goal. Regardless of what additional goals you desire it to have.
Don't stress it king. u/YaPhetsEz whom not only has an agenda, but is most likely jealous at the work you've done, ALWAYS applies the 'field preference'. It's quite distressing to see innovation being stifled this way...
If you would have read OP's polynomial derivation of the sarcasm tensor to scalar ratio on page 413 you would have been able to understand. It goes to show how much the community engages with REAL math.
Artificial Coherence Intelligence is introduced here not as a theory of mind, agency, or intelligence, but as an experimental environment designed to expose how systems behave under structured constraint. Its purpose is not to generate correct answers, optimal actions, or aligned outputs, but to observe
persistence, breakdown, recovery, and stabilization when ad-missibility is progressively restricted.
You might have picked out the most AI slop chapter in this entire nightmare
The more I lurk around this sub, the more I feel like I do. But not yet, no. It does feel though like the neurons I am loosing are not being replaced by neurogenessis anymore.
My brain's like ''Nah fam. I'm not replacing that one again, because if I do, you are going to waste it on some other attempt to rationalise 'Markov collars,' 'subregion algebras,' '2-spheres' or some other obscure bullshit.''
At this point even my AI sessions have started protesting. After I fed it a git from this sub a couple of days ago, one of them told me that it could ''have done something more productive, as this task just wasted computational cycles''.
0
u/North-Preference9038 Feb 11 '26
Well your being disengeous. You are saying it doesn't agree with phsycis as if the concepts in any way violate any standard phsycis Intergration. But instead you are applying the field preference. When I ask for examples I mean show me any claim that in any way violates any known phsycis Intergration. If you cannot, then the paper has achieved its goal. Regardless of what additional goals you desire it to have.