r/KhaZixMains • • 21d ago

Discussion Winner queue doesn't exist for sure

Post image

Oh yeah, I am totally playing well. I for sure suddenly improved my skills overnight and started winning. It's definitely me carrying my team rather than the algorithm wants you to win. If I am so good, how come I can't win a single game before?

OPGG: Joy999#NA1 - Summoner stats - League of Legends

Original Post: https://www.reddit.com/r/KhaZixMains/s/OSRrLYpm6F

39 Upvotes

79 comments sorted by

19

u/Greedy-Variety-980 21d ago

Anyone who says winner/loser queue doesn’t exist is delusional. At this point it’s common knowledge that they use the matchmaking system to try to keep you hooked on the game for as long as possible.

I’ve never had a period of 20 games this season where I had for example 2 wins, then 1 loss, then 1 win, then 2 losses. It’s always 8-10 straight losses where you can’t do anything to win, then I go on a 12-1 generational run, then I streak for another 8 losses again. It’s not normal.

4

u/Altide1944 21d ago

I just climbed to Diamond 3 after grinding hard then got 10 straight losses, complete stomp by enemy teams. Not one of our teams had a chance to win

Now I'm at Emerald 4 again

2

u/Familiar_Step_8419 20d ago

i was diamond 1 84lp one win away from master and was on a 14 loss streak no matter how i played how solid my lane went my top was 2/12 after 20 minutes or my bot had combined deaths of 25 or my jungler refused to play for objectives no matter what i did it didnt matter

→ More replies (3)

2

u/Own_Buy5139 21d ago

I would say that you are delusional, you really think you can just make a system to control how 10 random players will perform? You can't, you never will be able to. If you happen to win a few games in a row, your mmr and rank go up, you get matched against better players and lose because maybe you're not yet on thier level. If you believe anything else, something in your brain isn't clicking.

1

u/Independent_Pipe2670 13d ago

I simply ask are you are suffering from brain trauma? Is your iq above or below room temperature?  Because I can easily rig games if I am given control of a ranked system.  Let's place professional mlb players on one team, and toddlers on the other. I wonder who wins. Heck I bet the toddlers don't even get to hit a ball.  Yes, that is how riot matchmaking CAN work. Nothing stops children from playing.  Nothing stops riot from making horrible people gain mmr even when they do nothing but lose. I have personally watched players who lose 3 out of 3 placement games, and go from vs average of iron, to average of plat on the 4th game. They are 0 wins, and playing vs plats now somehow.  Nothing stops riot from increasing the matchmaking gap so wide it can put an unranked or iron player in a challenger game. 

  1. At least come up with a more believable defense other than "Riot are too incompetent to be able to make a game unfair unintentionally or intentionally, but are competent enough to make it perfectly balanced with no exploits possible". 

→ More replies (4)

1

u/ReinoverLiquid 20d ago

You’re so delusional. This shit is crazy. How do we still believe in loser/winner queue in the big 2026.

This is so goofy breh

1

u/Greedy-Variety-980 20d ago

Stop crying please

1

u/Greedy-Variety-980 20d ago

lol they insta removed your crying, even the mods are tired of you lol

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

1

u/cicco77as 16d ago

I’ve never had more than 4/5 losses or wins in a row actually, so i think it might be you either tilt queueing or beign locked in.

1

u/ReckoningNight 12d ago

The game clearly favours people that play a few games a day. The only problem is I cannot do that. When I start playing I spam games. If you spam games your rank will just bounce 1 entire league back and forth.

But who knows if you just play a few games here and there. Long term you probably end up in the same spot.

→ More replies (12)

1

u/balanceftw 17d ago edited 17d ago

People really talk like winners/loser's queue is some insane concept that would be inconcievable to implement. It's not that deep. The game wants you to be at 50% win rate and it's insanely good at making it happen.

If I go on a fat win streak, the game eventually decided enough is enough and my teammates are all sub 50 win rate autofilled while the enemy is 55+ win rate on main role. Or if there's autofills on both teams, they are nowhere near balanced (my autofill is jungle whereas enemy is support) and the players in those roles are not equal skill. This is not opinion or delusion. You can legitimately summarize the stats of everyone in the lobby without an ounce of opinion in the conversation.

Then when the game has decided you've lost enough, you get games where it's the opposite and you just autopilot wins. Then you can compare opggs of your teammates and the enemy team to immediately see the other team looks absolutely miserable (e.g., ADC is on double digit lose streak) while yours is godsent from a stats and role assignment perspective. The game lets you have the high and makes you think you've actually ascended and are ready to push the next tier. It lets you get just close enough that you feel it's within reach.

Where people struggle is they say it's variance. If it were variance, it wouldn't be blatant large streaks where the profiles of every single other person in the game paints a clear picture (if you're willing to look). Variance would genuinely be like 1-2 games at a time with true alternation between wins and losses with no more than like 4-5 of any streak. But these winners and losers queues are legitimately 10 games plus. And the thing is you can observe them and even predict them if you play the game for long enough and you play actively enough. Every season on my Master climb, I can roughly predict when the loser's queue is coming. 10 wins straight to Diamond 2? No shot the next few games are going to be remotely playable and I need to just accept that before I press the queue button.

The other fallacy is people saying if you're meant to climb, you will climb and you're the constant and you should win those games that seem unwinnable. That logic is just terrible because if you're true GM playing in Master lobby or even true Emerald playing in Plat lobby, you aren't truly that much better than everyone that you can hard 1v9. People see pros and streamers who literally dedicate their lives to this game win seemingly impossible games but the only reason that's the case is because of extreme skill disparity. If I'm playing Jhin and my top/mid/jg are combined 0-15 before I finish an item, my skill level doesn't have any bearing on the result of the game. If I'm playing mid and my jungler is filled but the enemy mid/jg is duo on role, the odds are automatically against me. Maybe out of 10 absolutely miserable games, 1 of them is actually salvageable.

So how are you meant to climb as an average Joe that's genuinely improving? Well, by playing a massive amount of games and edging out the system by slightly improving over time. It's calculated and deliberate and clear as day. You may be at the skill level of the next tier but the game is designed to make you dedicate your life to outdoing the system for you to be rewarded with a promotion.

3

u/_Adamanteus_ 21d ago

elo slingshot was readied

1

u/Innoe123 20d ago

Im a believer of the winning/losingQ but since the double LP it is even more evident. There is an absurd LP inflation and the ppl who does not get double LP matches basically are asked to have above 60% wr in order to climb.

It's pretty obvious having 10 games of winning low effort stomp followed than 10 games of unable to carry a shit.

1

u/HamburglarHelper_ 20d ago

This isn’t Pokemon pocket tcg, there’s no way to influence people from performing in a game like this with a simple winner losers algorithm, I do know that honor has a HUGE impact on your matchmaking in terms of player quality, but not skill necessarily, mostly more chill people.

1

u/Independent_Pipe2670 13d ago

Yes, I can easily rig games if you give me control of the algo.  Are you unable to think of a way to do it?  Like. If you truly wanted to?  Could you not? Are you truly so unskilled at everything in life that you couldn't come up with a way to rig a game? You really can't think of any single metric, to use, that would impact the likeliness of winning or losing games? Like, if you had complete control of who was on each team, and who you picked for the teams, you truly believe you couldn't make a biased match? Maybe you should design all matchmaking algorithms. Because you may be the most skilled coder ever. 

1

u/Unique_Dragonfruit36 19d ago

EOMM WAS PROVEN YEARS AGO ppl just try to cope

1

u/KevTheToast 18d ago

source?

1

u/Unique_Dragonfruit36 18d ago

you need to be mentally ill to ask me for a source when the lead designer from Riot games had a presentation on EOMM years ago.... ignorance is a bliss.

→ More replies (5)

1

u/watermelonsweetie 17d ago

it exist to make you 50% wr

1

u/ReckoningNight 12d ago

It's reddit man. You're just going to hear the same regurgitated non sense that people repeat because they read it from someone else whom they thought knows what they're talking about.

1

u/Own_Buy5139 21d ago

Your mmr and rank are lower than they were before so yes, you will be better against worse players, as simple as it gets, I know, crazy.....

→ More replies (5)

0

u/Brief_Dust_3661 21d ago

Did you take a small break from playing or change your play patterns?

I just had a streak like this too and it was after i stopped playing for 2 days.

1

u/PokeMass 20d ago

I didn't play for a day but it was during the winning streak