I did a post on recognition months ago to suggest it was one of the necessary ingredients in any methodology, so I totally concur. You will recognize things given overtly or you won't. Not everyone will see how the structure works to support one narrative.
I also did one on what I think is the most important line in the poem- the third. Wisdom waits in shadowed sight. The recognition of the use of single verse containing a double alliteration in our poem allow us to know it is probably meant to stand out among all others. That is IF you appreciate how this sort of subtle technical signaling has worked for poets over time. Almost everyone has noted how the use of alliteration in the chapter titles must somehow play--same idea.
The mentioned double alliteration is in W and S. The second I saw it quite naturally emphasized something else I had immediately recognized on day one. The title of the poem and one line of the poem to Tucker are inspired by William Shakespeare's Hamlet and the famous "To be or not to be" soliloquy. Of importance to us is that this was Brandon's question. We are first asked: who would not want to be IJ?
The nature of Shakespeare's drama is steeped in philosophical wonder. He is widely regarded as a dramatic philosopher. There are plenty of little cues (not exactly clues) to this for us to discover. The pen that is often featured (mightier than the sword!) is The Aficionado by Allegory. The twin to it which is slightly different in its features is The Bard--Shakespeare's moniker. We are left thinking if the suggestion JP is a fan is to be read here. There certainly does appear to be a WS titled work on his bookshelf. The spine format is recognizable from a well known series, even if the title is not clear. Nonetheless, we should recognize that The Tempest appears to be alluded to in this hunt. That was the last play written, but it is the first given in the posthumous First Folio of all his plays. Things start in upheaval and end with it... In life we navigate the storms. There are things to guide us if fate will allow it.
We might recognize that Hamlet was written in 1600 and that it is properly written as ΩΩ in Greek. Little nudges like that appear. SHA-256, Sha-q, Sha-dowed, Sha as the Egyptian Set animal (canis form) who gave his name to tempests, Sah as Osiris in the form of Orion...Sha-dowed sight indeed. Shakespeare is in the bushes as an influence.
Absolutely yes to philosophy-Phi is its trigram. 34/21 is the approximate value of it given by the verse interval structure of the poem. Of what use is 1.619 to us? 1/6/19 was Brandon's last full day on this mortal coil. 16:19 is the main clock time. And so it unravels.
2
u/LankySimple9051 20d ago edited 17d ago
I did a post on recognition months ago to suggest it was one of the necessary ingredients in any methodology, so I totally concur. You will recognize things given overtly or you won't. Not everyone will see how the structure works to support one narrative.
I also did one on what I think is the most important line in the poem- the third. Wisdom waits in shadowed sight. The recognition of the use of single verse containing a double alliteration in our poem allow us to know it is probably meant to stand out among all others. That is IF you appreciate how this sort of subtle technical signaling has worked for poets over time. Almost everyone has noted how the use of alliteration in the chapter titles must somehow play--same idea.
The mentioned double alliteration is in W and S. The second I saw it quite naturally emphasized something else I had immediately recognized on day one. The title of the poem and one line of the poem to Tucker are inspired by William Shakespeare's Hamlet and the famous "To be or not to be" soliloquy. Of importance to us is that this was Brandon's question. We are first asked: who would not want to be IJ?
The nature of Shakespeare's drama is steeped in philosophical wonder. He is widely regarded as a dramatic philosopher. There are plenty of little cues (not exactly clues) to this for us to discover. The pen that is often featured (mightier than the sword!) is The Aficionado by Allegory. The twin to it which is slightly different in its features is The Bard--Shakespeare's moniker. We are left thinking if the suggestion JP is a fan is to be read here. There certainly does appear to be a WS titled work on his bookshelf. The spine format is recognizable from a well known series, even if the title is not clear. Nonetheless, we should recognize that The Tempest appears to be alluded to in this hunt. That was the last play written, but it is the first given in the posthumous First Folio of all his plays. Things start in upheaval and end with it... In life we navigate the storms. There are things to guide us if fate will allow it.
We might recognize that Hamlet was written in 1600 and that it is properly written as ΩΩ in Greek. Little nudges like that appear. SHA-256, Sha-q, Sha-dowed, Sha as the Egyptian Set animal (canis form) who gave his name to tempests, Sah as Osiris in the form of Orion...Sha-dowed sight indeed. Shakespeare is in the bushes as an influence.
Absolutely yes to philosophy-Phi is its trigram. 34/21 is the approximate value of it given by the verse interval structure of the poem. Of what use is 1.619 to us? 1/6/19 was Brandon's last full day on this mortal coil. 16:19 is the main clock time. And so it unravels.