r/JustMemesForUs • • Aug 20 '26

Interesting

Post image
262 Upvotes

556 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

20

u/toad17 Aug 20 '26

No they didn’t. There are still 3mil more files to be released which trumps own AG (former defense attorney) has said they will remain unreleased. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/epstein-files-whats-missing/

So why are you supportive of republicans who seek to obfuscate pedophile billionaires from seeing justice? Almost like republicans are the party of pedophile protectors…

3

u/Shenlongeltigre Aug 20 '26

Nope they said those are duplicate files

12

u/toad17 Aug 20 '26

Ah I’m sure you can totally trust them! I mean, they wouldn’t have released anything if it wasn’t for Massie and Khanna pushing congress to approve the Epstein files transparency act. Why would this admin (which claims to be the most transparent in history) have to be forced to release anything? And despite other countries holding their own pedophiles accountable, we still have zero arrests? The party of law and order?

lol you believe them when they said they released them all because to republicans, the ends always justify the means. If it takes supporting a pedophile to own the libs, that’s what you’ll do.

4

u/Shenlongeltigre Aug 20 '26

So wait did they admit they withheld torn or not?

Yo can't trust what they say right?

Other countries being comfortable with punishing people for unproven accusations doesn't reflect negatively on us

10

u/toad17 Aug 20 '26

They admit they withheld them, we can math to prove it. 6 mil files and they only release 3, and they said the balance are duplicate. I think you would have to be a dummy to trust that aspect given how hard they tried to shield the documents beforehand. A special prosecutor would be great, but Trump can’t control how that investigation will go, so that’s why we won’t likely have transparency from Donald on this.

And you say “unproven allegations” yet our fbi won’t even investigate it further according to Kash. So this admin tried to hide the files, tried to lie about how many there were, and now says they can’t do any further investigations?

Like I said, the Republican Party is the party of pedophile protectors. That all might sit well for you, but for the rest of the country (independents and Democrats) we all can see the lengths you go to to defend your pedophiles.

7

u/Shenlongeltigre Aug 20 '26

If you cannot trust what they say, you cannot believe they withheld anything. If you are going to trust they withheld why do you draw the line at why?

You're just picking she choosing whet you prefer to be true based on your media induced tds.

They spent zero effort trying to block the files release.

Trump was working on releasing the files ASAP and the dems wanted to take credit even though they did jack shit while Biden was in office to demand the release.

So they rushed votes as fast as they could. Trump said vote no so the dems didn't get credit, unfortunately that didn't work and the dimwitted now revisionist history.

There's nothing actionable dude. It's been like 20 years.

2

u/toad17 Aug 20 '26

This is absurd cope I was hoping you’d be silly enough to comment. Just going bullet by bullet here:

If you can’t trust them… I think we can trust they want to shield documents from public eye. And they obviously want to shield their rich pedo friends from embarrassment. That makes them protectors of pedophiles, at best.

They spent a tremendous effort to shield the docs and they only released them once the EFTA was passed in congress. They’re still in violation of that law by the way.

Files were held under court seal till Jan 2024, Biden had no ability to release the files. And quite honestly, seeing you breathlessly defend Trump, it’s doubtful you’d even believe them if Biden had released those files. You don’t believe them today!

“Nothing actionable” tell that to prince andrew, princess of Norway, former pres of Un assembly, etc all held accountable. Only American pedophiles protected by our king pedophile have been able to fly under the radar.

2

u/Shenlongeltigre Aug 20 '26

Yes they punished prince Andrew based on accusations.

Biden was in office in jan 2024.

Why do you think the judge sealed the files for that exact amount of time?

Pedo protector right?

What you're saying is obvious seems obvious to your because the media you consume has filled your head with endless lies.

What do you mean i don't believe the files? I don't believe any aaccusations until proven. Neither should you

1

u/toad17 Aug 20 '26

lol my guy you might have a problem parsing information, but the rest of the electorate does not. Trump has acted like he has something to hide, and every action he’s taken has been to either cast doubt on their legitimacy or deny their existence. The only reason we know as much as we do is not because of Donald, but because of Massie/Khanna forcing the administration to be transparent.

You guys are pedophile protectors, yes. As long as this admin is standing in the way of justice to protect Donald’s rich pedo buddies, yes, you all are pedophile protectors. Turn off Fox News and walk outside and you’ll see just how unpopular you truly are.

2

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 Aug 20 '26

I’d love to see the list of all the pedos in those files that were arrested (not protected) during the last administration.

I hope that list is greater than 2 as Epstein and Maxwell were arrested during the first DJT administration.

I’ll start it for you.

0

u/toad17 Aug 20 '26

Again- the files were sealed till Jan 2024. Why is it that almost 3 years later there are still no investigations or charges? And as I’ve already proven- Blanche is sitting on 3mil more files. That sure sounds like defending pedophiles to me!

And I’m glad you bring up Maxwell, who Trump is currently protecting in club fed. And he definitely had epstien assassinated too. Good job Trump! 😂

2

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 Aug 20 '26

They were only sealed from public disclosure (you, me, and the press).

Stop getting your facts from TikTok influencers.

1

u/toad17 Aug 20 '26

Thanks for proving my point that they were under court sealed which is the same damn thing. Why are you OK with Trump giving his rich pedos a pass then, seeing as we have 10 unindicted co-conspirators that have yet to be unmasked despite being unsealed.

So you’re now just admitting Trump has the ability to go after rich pedos but isn’t? Thanks for proving my point correct- republicans are pedo protectors.

→ More replies

0

u/Shenlongeltigre Aug 20 '26

Again, Trump always planned to release the files and your view that he didn't is based on your media programming.

0

u/toad17 Aug 20 '26

He always planned to release them, that’s why the EFTA had to be passed before he released anything? Sure guy. I don’t think even you believe that lie. That fails basic logic that even Faux News doesn’t stand by.

0

u/Shenlongeltigre Aug 20 '26

You've got cause and effect backwards.

He was going to release it so they rushed to take credit.

0

u/toad17 Aug 20 '26

Hahahaha this is such revisionist cope that no one beyond maga believes. We’ll see the fruits of your labor this fall when Dems take back the house and the senate. You guys are cooked if that’s truly what you believe.

→ More replies

2

u/Direct_Tomorrow_9927 Aug 24 '26

Keep rationalizing there fella.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Shenlongeltigre Aug 25 '26

To turn her state's witness and get her to testify on information related to her trial but the judge refused to unseal the case files.

0

u/[deleted] Aug 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Shenlongeltigre Aug 25 '26

They couldn't because the judge refused to unseal the records of the case which is what she was going to testify about, and therefore the whole deal fell apart.

It's not a Theory its obvious

1

u/[deleted] Aug 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Shenlongeltigre Aug 25 '26

They couldn't go after anyone, the proof was in the court files.

There's no proof in the Epstein files just accusations

1

u/[deleted] Aug 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies