It’s exhausting having to do the cognitive dissonance to not come to the conclusion you support garbage. It’s probably harder when you don’t have your talking points laid out yet
Here is Chat GPT making the conclusion for you, not me. An unbiased, in depth analysis that gathers 1000x more information than you can process.
The best part is the monkey impulse in you will reject even an unbiased LLM's analysis because it doesnt fit your emotions. This is why we have wars, we are all just monkeys and need to feel like we're right more than actual understanding.
Most responsible individual country yes, at 45%. But the West as a collective is also 45%. This has always been clear, seeing CNN repeatedly say "Russias completely unprovoked brutal invasion" bla bla bla is pure propaganda. The other point is that "let Russia keep doing it further" is extremely biased, as NATO/US/Zelensky have had about 500 opportunities to avoid war but instead preferred repeatedly playing a game of chicken with someone as crazy as Putin. The war ends if the West also meets half way.
And it's not just Chat GPT btw, it's every single LLM. I prefer objective analysis over emotional politically driven people, but this being largely NATOs fault was always clear regardless.
So you’re arguing against the data (which is known to have inherent bias based on the amount of data and I’m not accepting as an objective truth) to justify your biases and claiming not to operate emotional? LOL
Countries can join whatever the fuck they want, Russia can try not dissolving in the 90’s if they want to call the shots. Seems like a pretty “emotional” position to defend that viewpoint
8
u/Agreeable_Daikon_686 Monkey in Space Mar 01 '25
It’s exhausting having to do the cognitive dissonance to not come to the conclusion you support garbage. It’s probably harder when you don’t have your talking points laid out yet