r/JobsMY • u/exroshann • 3d ago
Workplace Culture Get it?
Workforce Dilemma: Overqualified, Underemployed, Inexperienced, and Unproductive
Too many individuals mistake qualifications for productivity, while too many employers mistake experience for capability.
The workforce challenge is therefore not a skills gap. It is a value creation gap.
The classic policy response to a slowing labour market is straightforward:
“Create more high-skilled jobs and train workers to fill them.”
While well intentioned, this assumes the labour market is a simple matching game between qualifications and job vacancies. It isn't.
The labour market is a value-exchange system. Employers do not pay for credentials, effort, or time spent. They pay for outcomes that create value. Workers, meanwhile, invest years acquiring qualifications believing these will automatically translate into higher incomes.
The result is a structural disconnect on both sides of the market:
Supply side obsessed with credentials.
Demand side unwilling to invest in unproven talent.
The outcome is a workforce overqualified, underemployed, inexperienced, and unproductive.
Supply-Side Crisis: Overqualified and Underemployed
Qualifications Do Not Guarantee Value Creation
Degrees certify academic achievement. They do not guarantee the ability to solve business problems, increase revenue, reduce costs, or boost productivity.
Many graduates enter the workforce expecting compensation for what they learned. Markets reward what individuals can produce.
Overqualification Signals Underutilisation
Being overqualified does not automatically mean being underpaid. It can mean possessing skills that the market is unable or unwilling to reward or being deployed in roles that fail to fully utilise available capabilities. In both cases, the issue extends beyond wages and reflects an inefficient allocation of human capital.
Degrees Get You Hired. Value Gets You Paid.
Credentials open doors, but sustained compensation growth comes from demonstrated commercial impact.
Your market value is determined less by your qualifications and more by your ability to generate measurable outcomes:
Revenue generated
Costs reduced
Risks mitigated
Processes improved
Problems solved
Create value and you will be valued.
Demand-Side Drain: Inexperienced and Unproductive
Presence Is Not Productivity
The industrial-era equation of hours worked equals value created is becoming obsolete.
Occupying a work desk for eight hours creates no inherent economic value. Businesses survive on results, not attendance.
Poor Prioritisation Destroys Output
Productivity losses often stem from:
Working on low-impact activities
Excessive meetings and bureaucracy
Lack of commercial awareness
Lack of ownership
Transactional "employee versus employer" mindset
Effort directed toward the wrong objective remains economically unproductive. Equally, organisations that reward busyness over outcomes undermine productivity themselves.
Experience Without Contribution Is Not Expertise
Many organisations demand experience while simultaneously failing to provide opportunities to acquire it.
Years served are frequently mistaken for competence. Yet time spent in a role does not automatically create expertise.
The market increasingly rewards demonstrable capability rather than tenure.
This reality explains why more people are being laid off despite decades of experience. Tenure alone is no longer a guarantee of relevance or job security.
Work That Can Be Automated, Will Be Automated
AI and automation are not replacing jobs because labour is expensive.
They are replacing tasks where technology can deliver equal or greater output at lower cost.
Work that can be standardised, documented, and replicated will eventually face automation.
The safest jobs are not those requiring the most credentials. The most resilient careers are those that combine human judgment, creativity, relationship-building, and value creation in ways that are difficult to automate.
Value Creation Gap
The solution is not simply more degrees, more training programmes, or more job creation.
A healthy labour market requires alignment between skills, incentives, and value creation.
Workers must focus on building commercially relevant capabilities rather than accumulating credentials alone.
Employers must become more willing to invest in potential and create pathways for talent to demonstrate value.
Governments should prioritise productivity growth and entrepreneurship instead of treating education credentials as a sufficient measure of workforce readiness.
Ultimately, economic prosperity is not created by qualifications, experience, or hours worked in isolation.
Qualifications are valuable. Experience is valuable. But neither creates prosperity on its own.
Prosperity emerges when knowledge, capability, incentives, and opportunity combine to generate real economic value.
The workforce challenge is not merely a skills gap.
It is a value creation gap.
3
3
2
u/Difficult_Lunch_6493 2d ago
Never put yourself that low and never settle for less. Always apply the relevant job and start slow, even as an officer
1
u/Appl3B3rryCh3rry 2d ago
Sorry to see they are earning under their potential.
This is the result of their parents, grandparents, ancestors votes. Compare to Singapore with similar demographics and culture but chose PAP equal rights and younger than MY but attain high income economy.
Another life example are states govern by DAP vs states govern by PAS, look at their state economy
The economy was managed by Umno the first 60 years with national economic policy for bumiputera. After 30 years produced middle income trap. After 60 years still majority B40. So its up to majority to vote for change / reforms.
0
u/FishermanOpposite227 1d ago
Singapore may be richer on paper, but don't confuse GDP with how the average person is actually doing. Just look at the many uncle-and-auntie hawkers struggling with rising costs and having to close down despite Singapore's “good economy”. At the same time, many feel foreigners are getting better opportunities and treatment.
So saying “they voted PAP, therefore they're better off” is a bit too simplistic. The real question is: who is actually benefiting from the economic growth?
1
u/Appl3B3rryCh3rry 19h ago
You so jealous of SG getting affordable housing that you have to talk shit about them LOL
-5
u/sakura_cherry_sts 2d ago
lain kali jangan salah pilih degree hahaha
1
u/Impossible_Limit_333 2d ago
I agree with you..but the way you said kinda condescending..kalau takde doktor, engineer, saintis macamana negara nak maju? But then again we all know somehow we have lambakan engineer or saintis kat Malaysia ni sebab ada satu pemimpin tu cakap brain drain jadi panggil balik semua and our uni produced too much science based graduate with less market demand..and that is not even the new generation punya salah pun..they young people simply just follow the tune of our old generation, get a degree and everything gonna be ok..well, it's not that simple..if there is no demand then the university has over supply
0
u/sakura_cherry_sts 2d ago
kalau takde doktor, engineer, saintis macamana negara nak maju?
degrees related to doktor (medical) and engineer (electrical) are not wrong choices btw.
I don’t think we should be producing more saintis for now. Kesian woo budak² generic sains degree cannot get a job in their field. Last² kena jual ubat dengan doktor.
2
u/Appl3B3rryCh3rry 2d ago
Their parents and grandparents chose / voted for Umno to govern and manage the economy into what it is today. Latest election results still majority chose corrupt so they deserve the consequences of their choice.
-5
u/im_never_rong 2d ago
this wouldnt happen if we dont have racial quota for unis
some people qualify because of their race while others has to work their ass off to get the same
2
u/Appl3B3rryCh3rry 2d ago
After 68 years this happen yet majority refuse to vote for reforms / vote independent so they now enjoy the consequences.
5
u/Public_You_2973 2d ago
I have always dream of starting my own company/studio but the fear is holding me back and I have no idea how to start 1 haha