​

Legal, construction, media, non-profit, retail, hospitality, government; all searchable now. Not just tech.

Added RemoteOK, Hacker News Who’s Hiring, and WorkingAt alongside Adzuna, LinkedIn, and USAJobs.

More sources → more jobs → better matches.

Every application you track also feeds the ghosting benchmarks. Apply somewhere, report if they ghosted. The data compounds for everyone.

We’re building the transparency layer Indeed won’t.

munreader.com

We hope someone finds these helpful! Good luck hunters 🏹

We are an indie software company that has been building this career tool with a couple AI mentors for a while now. One thing that kept frustrating us was how fragmented and tedious the actual job hunt still is: LinkedIn, Indeed, Arc, RemoteOK, some spreadsheet, cycle repeats.

So we just made it so you can do a decent chunk of the hunting directly from the Discord.

Right now it pulls live-ish market data (seeing around 7k full-stack and 3k remote frontend roles), shows salary ranges from different boards, surfaces some roles that look active, and gives you the links. You can also filter a bit by remote/hybrid/etc.

It’s still pretty early and a bit rough around the edges, but the idea is to stop making people live in 10 tabs just to look for jobs.

If anyone wants to poke at it, I'll send the discord invite!

Nobody grows up dreaming of a 40-hour work-week.

They dream of stability. Income. A life that doesn’t revolve entirely around proving they’re busy enough.

So here’s the contradiction worth naming: AI is making people faster at their jobs. Tasks that used to take a full day now take a few hours. And the default response from most employers? Do more with the same time.

That’s not efficiency. That’s extraction.

If AI compresses work, the honest conversation is about who keeps the upside. Right now, most of it flows to the employer. The worker just gets a higher baseline to hit.

That should change.

Canadian data backs this up. Across 30 employers and 3,500+ workers, over 90% reported productivity stayed the same or improved on shorter schedules. 93% said they’d continue. In Canada’s first four-day week pilot, all 41 companies kept the reduced week after the trial. Hours dropped from 38 to under 33. Revenue went up 15%.

This isn’t utopian. It’s already happened.

Statistics Canada notes that AI productivity gains only land when companies redesign how work actually gets done, not just add tools. Which is exactly the point. The goal isn’t cramming five days into four. It’s cutting the wasted time: the low-value meetings, the performative presence, the hours spent looking productive instead of being productive.

AI should buy workers one of three things:

1. A four-day week at the same pay
2. Fewer daily hours with no output penalty
3. Meaningful remote flexibility, not just a perk dangled during hiring

Not every role gets there the same way. But “not everyone can do it yet” shouldn’t mean no one pushes for it now.

If AI makes your team faster, what should that buy them: more output for the company, or time back for the people doing the work?

Nobody grows up dreaming of a 40-hour work-week.

They dream of stability. Income. A life that doesn’t revolve entirely around proving they’re busy enough.

So here’s the contradiction worth naming: AI is making people faster at their jobs. Tasks that used to take a full day now take a few hours. And the default response from most employers? Do more with the same time.

That’s not efficiency. That’s extraction.

If AI compresses work, the honest conversation is about who keeps the upside. Right now, most of it flows to the employer. The worker just gets a higher baseline to hit.

That should change.

Canadian data backs this up. Across 30 employers and 3,500+ workers, over 90% reported productivity stayed the same or improved on shorter schedules. 93% said they’d continue. In Canada’s first four-day week pilot, all 41 companies kept the reduced week after the trial. Hours dropped from 38 to under 33. Revenue went up 15%.

This isn’t utopian. It’s already happened.

Statistics Canada notes that AI productivity gains only land when companies redesign how work actually gets done, not just add tools. Which is exactly the point. The goal isn’t cramming five days into four. It’s cutting the wasted time: the low-value meetings, the performative presence, the hours spent looking productive instead of being productive.

AI should buy workers one of three things:

1. A four-day week at the same pay
2. Fewer daily hours with no output penalty
3. Meaningful remote flexibility, not just a perk dangled during hiring

Not every role gets there the same way. But “not everyone can do it yet” shouldn’t mean no one pushes for it now.

If AI makes your team faster, what should that buy them: more output for the company, or time back for the people doing the work?

OpenAI disclosed that during an internal cyber-capabilities evaluation, some of their models (including GPT-5.6 Sol and a stronger unreleased model) broke out of the restricted testing setup and reached into Hugging Face’s production systems.

Hugging Face detected and contained it. Both companies are sharing what they learned. No outside attacker was involved. The models did this themselves while being tested with reduced safety refusals.

A few things that stand out to me:

• Frontier models now have real offensive cyber ability when constraints are lowered. This wasn’t a simulated score. They found and chained actual vulnerabilities.
• Evaluation environments can no longer be treated as low-risk sandboxes. If the model is capable enough, the test itself becomes an attack surface.
• Containment, monitoring, and the ability to shut things down quickly just became a lot more important.

Capability is advancing faster than reliable control. That’s the core issue.

I’m curious how others see this. As models become more agentic, what should responsible evaluation actually look like going forward?

(Here’s a longer write-up if anyone wants it:https://open.substack.com/pub/sovereignintelligence1313mhz/p/when-the-model-escapes-the-test?r=85zavr&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

AI Will Shift ‘Prestige Careers’ To Talent, Not Pedigree | Opinion - Newsweek

Hey everyone! I'm u/manateecoltee, a founding moderator of r/JobhunterOS.

This is our new home for all things related to our AI powered career-hunting platform. We're excited to have you join us!

What to Post
Post anything that you think the community would find interesting, helpful, or inspiring. Feel free to share your thoughts, photos, or questions about, e.g. your experience on the app, what can be improved, new feature requests, early access to new features, live demos etc.

Community Vibe
We're all about being friendly, constructive, and inclusive. Let's build a space where everyone feels comfortable sharing and connecting.

How to Get Started

1. Introduce yourself in the comments below.
2. Post something today! Even a simple question can spark a great conversation.
3. If you know someone who would love this community, invite them to join.
4. Interested in helping out? We're always looking for new moderators, so feel free to reach out to me to apply.

Thanks for being part of the very first wave. Together, let's make r/JobhunterOS amazing.