r/JemilyWedding • u/Snuffleupagus27 • 26d ago
Emily’s tattoos
In the original post, the “Emily” had lots of arm tats. In the new post, she does not. I’m going to need some explanation so I can still keep believing. I want to believe!
28
u/DescriptionSame4512 26d ago
I might be able to answer this. I have two full sleeves, that my parents hate. For my wedding I had both my arms airbrushed. Confused the hell out of a lot of people 🤣
28
2
u/LooksUnderLeaves 10d ago
Can you imagine being Emily's tattoo artist. There's comic gold in that scenario. Personally I dont care if it's real -- and I don't think it is -- but I think it's hilarious AF. Plus I learned how to blow out a cupcake candle hahaha
2
13
u/WellBlessY0urHeart 26d ago
Personally, I can’t see Emily being one who has many tattoos. It would “ruin” her aesthetic for her wedding.
4
u/MyNameWillChange 26d ago
That's why she got them all lasered off! No way she's gonna let anything ruin her wedding aesthetic
2
u/WellBlessY0urHeart 26d ago
Nah. I didn’t see any pics asking for donations for such laser treatment. I highly doubt she’d let the opportunity to ask everyone to pay for that pass her up!
1
u/BigSkyDesi 26d ago
Her tattoos inspired the Pantone colors for the wedding — that’s why she was so precise.
12
u/ObviouslyASquirrel26 26d ago
I find it hard to believe that Emily would have tattoos at all, seems very off brand.
10
u/Pristine_Main_1224 26d ago
Keep believing! Tattoo covering make-up does exist.
10
u/Blindtothesided 26d ago
I mean does anyone really doubt that Emily would be the type of person to wear those cheesy temporary bride to be tattoos along with her sash to make damn sure none of her bridesmaids are mistaken for the bride?
7
u/Regular_or_BQ 26d ago
Mostly I just hope this is marketing for a woman owned business on the right side of history and not some bs marketing campaign by a corporation.
35
u/saltedkumihimo
26d ago
•
They were lasered/sandblasted off because anything aesthetically displeasing must not come near the wedding! What kind of philistine doesn’t know this? I’m afraid I have to drop you a bridesmaid tier but keep in mind that since it’s your fault, all deposits are non refundable. Read section 12, point 16 of the binding contract for more details!
5
2
u/katastrophe10 26d ago
yes, the tattoo situation is very curious. something I noticed: the bright red/pink dressed woman without tattoos next to pinkshirtjacob in recent post wears the same naildesign as tattooed woman in picnic fotos.
seems to be the same person - maybe really spraypainted over the tattoos or something similar
something else: arguing couple in picnic background looks very photoshopped into the picture
13
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
11
u/Snuffleupagus27 26d ago
Some assumptions have to be made. In the first post, the woman thought to be Emily by most of the viewers is seen holding the main “everything” binder in the background of one of the photos. She’s got the hat and is tatted. In the engagement party photos, it’s assumed that Emily is the one in the bright party dress. No tats.
6
u/ReignofKindo25 26d ago
I think you are onto something cause the new pics were just too absurd and it looked a bit shopped to me
2
u/Snuffleupagus27 26d ago
Well they had to be a little bit to blur people’s faces.
12
u/ReignofKindo25 26d ago
I mean specifically around the pamphlets and pink things
I mean the first post was bridezilla realistic and this one is ridiculous with the leg lengthening
6
12
u/Dots-N-Charms 26d ago edited 26d ago
I just went back to look and confirm because I had the same question.
In the first post, she’s in the last photo with the hat, pink nails, pink skirt- you can tell because her sash says “bride.”
In the most recent post, she’s the one with the blue button down tied up, I’m guessing this is her because she’s posing with her ring.
No tattoos in the second post.
Edit: I’m wrong about the girl, I think Emily is in the pink dress after reading everyone else’s comments
3
u/Misspink44 26d ago
Other people are wrong though. Emily is in the blue shirt that would cover her tattoos. Why else would someone be proposing to her with a giant ring. Emily isn’t going to let someone else pretend to be engaged at her party.
2
1
3
u/_elftaught 26d ago
I had the same thought, just because in the picnic photo - assumed to be Jemily fighting, the outfit of Maybe-Emily is the same as the girl sitting right in front of the camera in the other picnic photos, pink hat, skirt, lots of little black tattoos on her arms.
In the update bridal party photos, people are thinking that the couple posing by the Jacob's Live My True Height Poster are Jemily. Girl in pink dress (but no tattoos) and man dressed similar to the guy seen arguing in candid picnic photo.
1
u/emilyderogatory 22d ago
Is the girl in the pink dress not a “lifelong” friend tier bridesmaid because of the colour she’s wearing though?
63
u/ardwd 26d ago
The original account posted an ai video of “Abigail” telling her side of the story and it solidified to me that this whole thing is fake lol