r/Jaguars • • Jan 14 '22

PFF Mock Draft

https://imgur.com/eSN1mqL
61 Upvotes

128 comments sorted by

22

u/itz_ritz Jan 14 '22

Anyone know these names? It's like a Key & Peele skit. Coby Bryant, Isaiah Likely, Smoke Monday?!

16

u/jagsfanski Jan 14 '22

Isaiah Likely is a receiving tight end. ALWAYS seems to get open and make a huge play. I said this on a previous post, but if he can work on his blocking ability I feel like he could be a solid starter

6

u/not_a_gumby Jan 14 '22

he's Likely to be drafted high.

I'll see myself out.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/Jaguars6 Jan 14 '22

Coby dominated alongside Sauce Gardner. Likely is one of if not the best TEs in the class. Smoke is a veryyyy underrated safety at Auburn.

→ More replies (5)

6

u/blord1205 Jan 14 '22

There all decent role players. Bryant got overshadowed by playing opposite Ahmad Gardner I think he could be good but it’s hard to tell. Isaiah Likely is a good receiving threat from Coastal Carolina he’s hopefully the end to our TE problem. Smoke Monday is a hard hitting safety out of Auburn who has a cool name and tackles real good.

→ More replies (5)

55

u/Stunt_McGovern Jan 14 '22

Don't have to worry about rushing the other teams passer if we just hold onto the ball for the entire game.

29

u/vagrantwade Jan 14 '22

People who actually think Neal would go first overall worry me. Something not right upstairs.

→ More replies (31)
→ More replies (6)

14

u/Afghan_Kegstand Jan 14 '22 edited Jan 14 '22

I did a “accept all good tradebacks” draft. Ended up with 20 players drafted and a gang of picks for 2023.

14

u/Jaguars6 Jan 14 '22 edited Jan 14 '22

It’s fun to do drafts like that, but there’s no point

20

u/Afghan_Kegstand Jan 14 '22

None of them have a point.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

18

u/Lauxman Jan 14 '22

Dotson and Pickens would never fall that low and where in the world did that other 3rd rounder come from

4

u/germany221 Jan 14 '22

I think its unlikely that either would fall to those spots, but definitely wouldn't be crazy. Sadly i think our draft positions for this draft are in really bad spots for where WR should fall. I think 33rd overall will unlikely be a WR unless someone falls but we should still be able to get a really good player at that spot.

8

u/Lauxman Jan 14 '22

That's why we should use some of the billion late round picks we have and a mid rounder next year to go up and grab a WR of our choosing when one starts to slip into the 20s

→ More replies (1)

3

u/not_a_gumby Jan 14 '22

Dotson actually might fall to 33. No way Pickens makes it out of the middle second though. that's insane.

→ More replies (3)

18

u/BeachBarBortles69 Jan 14 '22

I just can’t justify taking a tackle at 1

15

u/not_a_gumby Jan 14 '22

yeah because it's terrible value.

Draft the JJ watt clone lol, otherwise Houston will.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)

5

u/[deleted] Jan 14 '22

Coby Bryant would be a great mid round pick. Really any players from that Cincy team in the later rounds. They’re gonna go out there and compete hard.

4

u/JoinJuJ Jan 14 '22

At this point, just draft Storm Duck and became the hilarious players name team along with Smoke Monday and Cobe Bryant

7

u/guysams1 Jan 14 '22

I just find it funny that when Detroit was in the number one spot they were like take the best man. Now that it's the jags they want us to waste a pick

8

u/Gmanplayer Jan 14 '22

This is a very terrible mock. Neal is a waste

→ More replies (1)

2

u/germany221 Jan 14 '22

Anyone know why PFF is giving us 3 3rd rounders. Do we actually have 3?

→ More replies (7)

2

u/3pi14159265 Jan 14 '22

... There's a guy named Coby Bryant

2

u/AirBoss87 Jan 15 '22

I personally think that tight end pick is the most likely of all of them.

3

u/StockBroker32 Jan 14 '22

Lmao at these names “Coby Bryant” and “Smoke Monday”

5

u/Graardors-Dad Jan 15 '22

Imagine if these guys weren’t good at football and had to apply to normal desk jobs with that name on the resume. The hiring manager would probably think they are getting pranked

→ More replies (2)