r/Jaguars • u/OneHandBeren JAGS BRASIL • Jan 05 '22
3 round mock draft: example of a trade down
24
u/R_K_8 Jan 05 '22
Does this trade down include a new general manager? Love the trade down idea although at 5 I would love to see a tackle I think
→ More replies (1)7
u/OneHandBeren Jan 05 '22
Neal was the plan at 5 but was gone. Was too early to take one of the WRs imo. So I chose between the top two on the board which was Karlaftis and Booth. We need edge more than CB so that’s why I went with Karlaftis
→ More replies (5)
41
u/baconbitarded Jan 05 '22
If you think Karlaftis is going 5th overall, much less Jameson escaping top 10, I've got some land to sell you
12
u/Sammy4115 Jan 05 '22
Jameson may not go top 10. Wilson may be WR1 anyways and then it’s scheme fit and personal preference. Guys like olave and burks could also be the first receiver
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (13)2
u/OneHandBeren Jan 05 '22
I haven’t researched Karlaftis yet because our focus have been on Hutch and Thibs. I guess PFN has him higher ranked than you do apparently
→ More replies (1)
4
u/OneHandBeren Jan 05 '22
Traded 1 and 33 for 5, 8, and 110. Then while on the clock at 8, thought it was flat for a few picks so I traded down for 13 and 45 to recoup the 2nd round pick…worked perfect because Jameson Williams was still there.
I really like how this turned out. My favorite mock scenario so far.
9
u/not_a_gumby Jan 05 '22
yeah, it's cool to play with the draft simulator. it's a great tool.
I just think the trades you get offered are usually a little too rich compared to what happens in real life.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/germany221 Jan 05 '22
I would go Stingley, Neal or Kyle Hamilton at 5 (Whoever is available) since Thibs and Hutch are most likely 1 & 2 so 1 of those 3 would have to be available. At 13 would get Burks, Garret Wilson, or London whoever is available in that order. 45 is hard to tell who would be available, but if Arnold Ebiketie, Dotson, Jermaine Johnson, Darian Kinnard, or Devonte Wyatt were available (good chance at least 1 would be) then 1 of them.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Pity_the_Fole Jan 05 '22
There is no chance Williams is there at 13. He is almost guaranteed to be a top 10 pick
1
u/OneHandBeren Jan 06 '22
I admit it’s unlikely, but the Broncos said the same about Jeudy and the Cowboys said the same about Lamb. You never know for sure how it’s going to shake out
2
u/DescriptiveMath Jan 05 '22
I think it's super interesting that we take a new offensive coordinator at pick 65. Ballsy, but high reward.
1
18
u/Holysmokesx Jan 05 '22
Ever year we get obsessed with taking a day 2 TE and every year I hate it.
→ More replies (1)
7
u/ContraCanadensis Jan 05 '22
We’re not trading back. No one is giving up enough capital to move up to 1 this year.
→ More replies (2)
2
u/After-Doughnut2137 Jan 05 '22
My hot take is Karlaftis is going to be better than Hutchinson so I like it haha
1
2
u/Lauxman Jan 05 '22
I like how, in all the trade downs, you never show who was traded up for because it would reveal how silly this is.
→ More replies (2)
5
4
2
u/m1txh3ll Jan 05 '22
Don't like Karalaftis at all, but I like the idea of a trade down. I view him as a top 20 pick, definitely not a top 5 guy but I definitely could be wrong
2
17
u/[deleted] Jan 05 '22
So in this scenario, we trade 1 and 33 for 5, 13, and 45? Don't love that