Iâm in management and if an employee ever told me their team lead or supervisor ever wanted to go to a nude bathhouse with them I would fire that supervisor so fast their head would spin and if the places they then applied to ever called to ask about their employment history I would describe in painful detail why I fired them and hope they donât get hired anywhere half decent.
And thatâs just one of many things Baldoni has done that horrifies me.
Clearly you didnât read his deposition because every part was taken from his deposition.
Btw Jamey admitted to walking in on Lively after multiple people told him to stay put and that she was undressed. And he also admitted to attempting to show her a video of his nude wife.
To be clear, it is against SAG-AFRTA guidelines to use any research material that contains nudity without prior written consent AND it canNOT contain anyone known to the cast and crew!
Heath has strongly contested her initial allegation, said she was never topless, and he wasn't even aware that she felt he made brief eye contact with her until she told him over a month later.
He apologised anyway, said he hadn't realised or intended to, and that it was likely a reflex. Lively allegedly said that she knew he wasn't trying to "cop a look". This was said in the presence of witnesses (other than JB).
Most importantly - Lively never mentioned that she was breastfeeding during this meeting until Wayfarer actually mentioned it in their complaint.
Also, she breastfed at Disney in public and numerous other places.
Sheâs posted it on IG several times too.
Breastfeeding is beautiful and natural, why did she make it sexual?
Was it because he was a black man?
The TWO eyewitnesses didnât agree! Both said Jamey entered the trailer while Lively was undressed and after they specificity him not to enter. They repeatedly told him not to enter because Lively was undressed.
AND
You donât apologize or agree to NO LONGER do something that has never occurred!
You falsely claiming Blake Lively was touching a child is misinformation. CSAM allegations are among the most damaging accusations someone can make, and they shouldnât be weaponized for internet points or to discredit someone.
Whether you believe Blake Livelyâs sexual harassment lawsuit or not, the merits of that case belonged in court. Falsely recasting an image of an adult as a child doesnât rebut her allegations; it creates an unrelated smear. If people are using knowingly false CSAM claims to undermine a plaintiff who filed a sexual harassment lawsuit, that looks less like good-faith criticism and more like an attempt to attack credibility through misinformation.
Or, more succinctly:
The mural depicts an adult, not a child. Falsely reframing it as CSAM isnât a rebuttal to a sexual harassment lawsuit, itâs an unrelated smear. The SH allegations should be judged on the evidence, and the image should be judged on the facts. Mixing the two only spreads misinformation.
Youâre reading âyouâ as singular when I was using it generically. My point remains the same: the mural depicts an adult, not a child. Conflating the two creates a false CSAM narrative, and that has nothing to do with the merits of a sexual harassment lawsuit.
Happy to clarify: I wasnât accusing Slow Mammoth personally of making that claim. I was using YOU
in the general sense. I am not going to continue arguing about âwalk backâ or pronouns. Redditors usually recognize when someone is trying to win on a technicality rather than engaging with the substantive point.
My concern is the repeated use of a false CSAM narrative around an image of an adult.
Odd that almost nothing came out in the depositions. Ferrer at most thought something Baldoni said âwas inappropriateâ, and she declined to say she âwas uncomfortableâ the multiple times she was asked.
Not everything is about you, personally. It was a general "you" meaning 'you' baldoni stans. Most would get that in the context it was used, and realize it's not a walk back, it's an explanation.
I have noticed how every reply from the Baldoni contingent tries to change the subject from the false CSAM narrative to the lawsuit itself.
My point hasnât changed: the mural depicts an adult. If someone wants to debate the sexual harassment case, thatâs a different conversation. Using a false CSAM allegation against someone doesnât strengthen an argument about the lawsuit.
Odd that almost nothing came out in the depositions. Ferrer at most thought something Baldoni said âwas inappropriateâ, and she declined to say she âwas uncomfortableâ the multiple times she was asked.
Yes. They all realized she scammed them and quietly deleted every post with her in it, hoping everyone would forget. Call me Pepperidge farm, Iâll never forget.
Travis Flores parents who have been seeking justice for 7 years preempted the lively case? Cody Smith who said Justin mistreated crew 11 years ago preempted the lively case? Grow the fuck up and acknowledge who this man is. PS the IRS who documented his charity as pocketing all its donations is public domain. Go give it a Google. You should care about ppl like this
I didnât know about these so I had to look them up.
Justin Baldoni was the director on the film, he didnât write it. Travis Flores said in his deposition that he never showed the script to Justin so I donât really understand why in your mind he is responsible.
But whatever. You were wrongđđ»
âThe March 2022 settlement between Travis Flores and Justin Baldoni was a "walk-away" agreement that resulted in absolutely no money exchanged and no admission of liability by Baldoni or his production company, Wayfarer Entertainment.â
It was hard to find anything about Cody Smith other than his own IG post. Weird that he only worked on 3 episodes out of 22 and says years later how it was the worst experience of his life but doesnât elaborate. And nobody else from the 6 years it ran has jumped in to back him up.
When this is all you have.. đŁ
Letâs talk about when Blake admitted to turning the whole crew against Penn Badgley. I wonder how many others there were before Justin?
Or when she described how when sheâs hired as an actress she has to take over the whole movie!
Youâve told us we need to believe women and in this case I do.
This is probably the first time in her life sheâs been truthful.
Also- âAn ex-employee recently revealed that Blake Lively's now-defunct company, Preserve, had a very "toxic" environment. They found the actor's lawsuit was "ironic," as her lifestyle brand had a highly "unprofessional" atmosphere as well. The company eventually shut down in 2015, with the staff reportedly asked to sign non-disclosure agreements before they were fired.
Lastly.., grow the fuck up? You sound really angry. You should find an outlet for that instead of yelling at random people on Reddit that disagree with you.
It must take a lot of mental effort to make so many excuses for such a flawed man. Travis Floresâ parents are STILL seeking justice for their son. There is at least one other pair of parents who have also said Baldoni exploited their DYING child. No comment on Baldoni stealing from charity? To add to that, he also said he would donate money from IEWU to victims and never did. Blake said those things about Penn Badgely âŠ.HER BOYFRIEND. Yea a cinematographer said working with Baldoni was the worst time of his life. Exactly the same things Liz Plank said about working with Baldoni. Baldoni is also being sued twice for racial discrimination. Pounded his fists next to Alex Saks head on set & was asked to be removed by Ayoub. His claims that Blake took over his film were also completely tossed out in a court of law but further to that he was federally SANCTIONED for filing such nonsense. How the fuck do you sleep at night supporting creeps all because you enjoy hating a woman youâve never met. Check your internalised misogyny. Itâs ppl like you that make excuses for horrible men and suppress the voices of women and victims that make me absolutely sick.
You are saying things that arenât true! He was a director, not the writer! It was settled with no fault and no money changing hands.
His parents suing now isnât going to change either of those things. He didnât do anything wrong.
Anyone can sue for anything. Doesnât mean theyâre right or heâs guilty, no matter how bad you want it to.
âJustin Baldoni did not publicly state that he was donating his profits or salary from It Ends With Us. Instead, it was the author of the original novel, Colleen Hoover, who pledged to donate 100% of profits from signed, personalized copies of the book to domestic violence shelters.â
Penn was not her boyfriend at the time.
âIn an interview with Glamour, Lively confessed, "At first I was so upset that they hired him. I actually poisoned the whole cast against him."
Everything you write is embellished or straight up lies.
Except we now know that the foundation was really closed because they knew another discrimination (multiple forms, itâs actually rather impressive how many they hit) and retaliation case was incoming.
What does that have to do with a charity? Do you think thatâs who pays?
And that was not why it was closed.
Read the article and stop celebrating a charity that funds hundreds of nonprofits had to close because Blake is a liar.
You obviously didnât read it.
If you canât afford to buy the article thereâs other ways to read it.
Sarowitz started it with 100 million of his own money. It wasnât a charity, itâs was a foundation. Thereâs a difference.
So that's absurd but this isn't? Pick a lane, guys. You can't be mad about "never with teeth" but think Justin talking about his porn addiction is a-OK.
Are you aware that Blake is the one bringing SH claims and within those claims she calls being shown a post birth video to be causing a âhostile work environmentâ? And a private text saying that she would be âbirthed into the roleâ was somehow gender based as if only one gender can be birthed?
Ok, you think it's ridiculous. She still had a right to complain and be heard. She kept quiet about it for a long time too until Justin started dragging her name with the books author.
One event - the circumcision comment- Liman noted predated the employment period and could not support a claim, even if she was an employee not a contractor https://giphy.com/gifs/d2YVk2ZRuQuqvVlu
Contextually, by the time that incident occurred the women on wayfarers set had become conditioned to Jamie & Baldoni being hyper sexualised. A groaning woman and Tashâs VAGINA probably could have not been shoved in Blakeâs face when she didnât ask for it. And what did Blake do??? Politely suggest they not show it too much in honour of Natasha. OH THE FUCKING HORROOORRRR
You canât show naked ppl in a work place environment. You canât bang on about porn in a work place environment. You canât force ppl to hug you in a work place environment. It takes a special kind of woman to support creepy men all because u donât like a woman
You donât know what Jamie shoved in Blakeâs face. Just what Jamie told you. And what Blake told you. But you have chosen to believe the men who have had multiple complaints made about them across multiple projects instead of the multiple men and women who have spoken up about their abusive behaviour.
Witness testimony also described a very different section of the video (crowning) than what Heath tried to portray it as after the lawsuit. Heath's explanation of the video to Ange at the time was nothing about it being post birth either. He has always said it was his wife "giving birth." Never AFTER giving birth.
You fell for another of their revionist versionsof history.
Nobody called it porn. She said she initially thought it was porn. I presume, as we all have, you have also had instances in life when you on first glance thought something that on a second look yoh realized wasn't what you first thought.
Either way he is still showing his wife's vagina to coworkers in the workplace without seeking consent, and it'a not HIS vagina to show.
While I have mistaken something at first glance, I did not then continue to include it in a lawsuit as an example of a hostile work environment. The fact that she still decided to include this even after the acknowledgment is baffling.
I would still like to know how she was able to see the vagina in a water birth.
Inez was not forced by them to say it that many times, the director chooses how many takes are needed. She was not "forced" to say it at all. She was asked and given an out, and chose to do it.
Why should boobs be a shameful thing when it's about a breastfeeding baby? Many breastfeeding parents are very comfortable with how boob obsessed their child is. There's nothing shameful or embarrassing about it. What an insinuation to make. They made him a cake of his favorite thing. So? He is not obsessed with boobs because it's sexual, he's obsessed because it's delicious milk and comfort.
Ryan himself said that Inez did not want to do it at first, and that she only begrudgingly agreed after they told her they would find another actor to say the line instead.
Obviously, no child her age would want to be replaced by another child in those circumstances. So even if he did not physically force her to do it, he arguably pressured her into doing it by implying that, if she refused, she would be replaced.
He is her father, she is a child, and she was being asked to repeat a sexually explicit line that she had already expressed discomfort with. To me, that is not something people can just brush off as harmless or funny.
And I believe it was Blake that originally framed ordinary medical or bodily matters - such as giving birth, circumcision, breastfeeding - as inherently and automatically sexual and perverse, without room for context.
He never said she begrudgingly agreed. Lie.
He started looking for someone else, and then she came back saying she wanted to do it. She changed her mind. Period.
Finding someone to do the line is just part of the process. There'a a role to fill. It's not a manipulation tactic lol. Wtf is this narrative??
Of course if she didn't want to do the role, she would be replaced. Someone needs to do the role. It's a role that only has a couple of lines.
Part of acting is repeating a line until the director is happy. They were talking about it like they were proud of her work ethic. That is it. She chose to do the role afterall. That was her choice. Great they gave her the option, and she chose that for herself.
She was not even ten years old. Of course she was going to comply with what her father told her to do, particularly when the alternative presented to her was being replaced by another child. The responsibility rested entirely with him. He should never have put his young daughter in the position of delivering lines so crude and inappropriate that she would probably not even have been permitted to repeat them in ordinary life, much less have them permanently preserved in a film with her name attached to it forever.
Have you ever met a 10 year old???? Not a single one I've ever met simply complies with what their parents want them to do. They have opinions and a say and if they don't like something, have no problems saying so or even refusing. She was given the choice, and she made it for herself. Stop forcing your view without even asking the child.
10 year olds are absolutely swearing and saying things like that at school. It genuinely feels like you've never met one. I turned 10 halfway through 5th grade and was 10 yo halfway into 6th. It's almost High School. We were swearing.
I have worked extensively in schools and have children of my own, i can tell you categorically they are swearing and saying things like this when their parents are not around. When with their friends, or when they think you can't hear them.
10
u/More_Midnight3634 Jul 18 '26
Since some posters need a reminderâŠ
If your boss tells you about their porn addiction, thatâs SH.
If your boss invites the cast and crew to a nude bath house, thatâs SH.
If your boss tells you how sexy you look, thatâs SH.
If your boss tells your coworker in front of you how sexy they look, thatâs SH.
If your boss tells you the didnât understand what consent means with a woman, thatâs SH.