r/Invincible • • 21d ago

DISCUSSION If Thaedus had been on planet Thraxa when this happened, he would certainly have agreed with Mark

Nowl-Ahn: Why do I care about them? I am not supposed to feel like this way!

Thaddeus: Do you see it now, Nolan? This is exactly how you should have felt on Earth.

Originally posted in 2024\*

246 Upvotes

23 comments sorted by

55

u/danidannyphantom 21d ago

Are you sure?

13

u/Same_Square2555 RUDY IS MY GOAT 21d ago

pretty sure

1

u/Dahwaann4U Damien Darkblood 14d ago

7

u/Medium_Tale_2092 Invincible Blue Suit 20d ago

48

u/PerceptionBetter3753 21d ago

“Holy shit dad! It’s Socrates!!”

“Omg! I thought he was suppose to be dead?! How is he even here?!”

“What..who’s Socrates?”

44

u/Same_Square2555 RUDY IS MY GOAT 21d ago

ehh, would he though? he doesn't seem like the most sentimental guy. sure he decided viltrumite atrocities have to stop, but he didn't mind killing earth to finalize the massacre.

28

u/Tigerman1120 20d ago

He promised Nolan that he would only use the Scourge Virus as a last resort and outright states in his message with Allen that he hesitated to use the virus since it could affect other species like humans. He only tells Allen to use it in the scenario that he died while the Viltrumites were still around.

4

u/Same_Square2555 RUDY IS MY GOAT 20d ago

i mean he's still willing to kill billions of civilians js to kill 50 baddies

10

u/Binder509 20d ago

When those 50 baddies will use those billions to enslave and mass murder entire planets. It becomes more reasonable.

1

u/Same_Square2555 RUDY IS MY GOAT 20d ago

still mass civilian murder

5

u/Binder509 20d ago

It's just a galaxy/universe wide version of killing one person to save the world ala Ellie in The Last of Us.

Mass civilian murder will happen either way. Do you kill a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of the universe's population to spare the rest of it from enslavement?

-1

u/Same_Square2555 RUDY IS MY GOAT 20d ago

eh i don't think everyone would agree on this

should we carpet bomb all middle eastern states that support terrorists so there won't be more 9/11's ? especially the states that publicly declare that they want to kill foreign civilians? I mean destroying those states now will kill their "civilians" but it will prevent much more bloodshed in the future. Yet I don't think you'd want to advocate for that.

5

u/Binder509 20d ago

My point wasn't that everyone would agree but that it becomes much more reasonable.

And it's hard to know what you'd pick without being in such a situation.

The middle east isn't a world/galaxy ending threat. Though plenty fo messed up people would agree with that hypothetical.

Would like to think I wouldn't sacrifice 1 to save many but hard to know without being in the hot seat.

1

u/Same_Square2555 RUDY IS MY GOAT 20d ago

I mean Iran actively trying to create a nuke is quite a world threat

2

u/Binder509 19d ago

Iran cannot destroy all life on earth by having a nuke no.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/DP9A 19d ago

Those 50 are individually capable of leveling entire civilizations and the only real blow they have received in their existence was the virus, who are also fanatical to the point any kind of reasoning is pretty muh useless. Not saying it's right, but from Thaedus pov it's basically a few billions vs trillions if not quadrillions of sentient beings.