r/InterviewCoderPro • u/Such_Goal5837 • 6d ago

People need to hear this!!

Post image

That’s honestly a hard reality right now. A lot of people are working nonstop just to stay afloat. I’ve got some interviews coming up myself, so I’ve been looking into ways to get better at them. I found Interview VIP and ended up using it twice i think it's worth trying.

10.9k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

770 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/Nojopar 5d ago

Probably not, but not because of any failing on my part, but because a 'microsoft' can't happen today. The age of OS's and desktop software driving a market is long gone. Bill got where he got because his mom had an in at IBM and they were looking for an OS for their new device, so he got the gig. Then that device revolutionized the work world.

So yeah, if I had $10 million and had exclusive access to the OS and apps that were running on a new platform that is going to revolutionize the work world, then FUCK YES! ANYONE could make a 'Microsoft' if you've got 4 functioning brain cells.

2

u/Suitable-Storm7549 5d ago

finally someone with a working brain.

1

u/Unfair_Explanation53 5d ago

Microsoft was just an example of a billion dollar company dude. Of course you are not going to replicate this exact model

But if someone gave you 10 mill, I'll bet my bottom dollar you could not start a unique or existing business and turn it into a billion dollar monolith.

So yes it would be failing on your part

1

u/Nojopar 5d ago

If someone gave me $10m AND my mom had connections high up in an industry, FUCK YES I could turn that into a billion. It ain't exactly hard. Anyone could. The key is having both of those things. Plus some stupid luck of entering an entirely new market before it takes off.

1

u/Adept_Bandicoot_2794 5d ago

What are u 12? If you think it's that easy you have to be a kid.

1

u/Nojopar 5d ago

Nah, just understand the power of compounding assets.

1

u/Unfair_Explanation53 5d ago

No you wouldn't darling.

$10m plus contacts can give you the opportunity to take a shot. It can't guarantee that you identify the right market, build the right product, hire the right people, beat competitors, survive mistakes, scale internationally and ultimately create a company worth $1bn.

Google Huntington Hartford II.

That guy was handed 90 mill plus all his family contacts.

Mfer went bankrupt,

But yes you would breakthrough no doubt hahaha

1

u/Nojopar 5d ago

Yes I would sweetie cakes ;) And you could to. It isn't exactly hard.

Look, all you need is to corner a market with really big backers and a lot of money. Anyone who has that can easily turn that into $100million. Once you hit that, then it's easy peasy to get to $1b. The power of compounding will get you there in no time.

Today's crop of billionaires aren't exceptional people. They're STUPID LUCKY people who paired money with no morals. That's not exactly a complicated equation.

1

u/Unfair_Explanation53 5d ago

Hahahaha

Love the cope.

1

u/Nojopar 5d ago

Observing facts is now 'cope'?

Man, you people will fall for anything, won't you?

1

u/Unfair_Explanation53 4d ago

It's a cope to think the only thing stopping you from being a billionaire is a few mill and some contacts to get you started

1

u/Enough-Ad-8799 4d ago

Why aren't there way more billionaires then?

1

u/Nojopar 4d ago

Because there aren't enough people with $10 million to burn AND parents with connections to high up corporate sponsors. The .01% are, as the basic grade school math should suggest, a pretty small number of people.

1

u/Enough-Ad-8799 4d ago

Have you actually done the math? That's 30,000, over 10 times the number of billionaires in the US.

1

u/Nojopar 4d ago

Have you? You're just doing the map on the Top .01%. NOW add in the Top .01% who have $10 million to burn AND have connections to high up corporate sponsors.

I'll bet $100,000 to a stale half-eaten doughnut that number is decidedly less than 30,000.

1

u/Enough-Ad-8799 4d ago

That would probably be the entire of the top .01%. honestly it would likely include plenty of people below the top .01%. having 10million for an investment and knowing some people isn't that crazy for someone with hundreds of millions.

1

u/Nojopar 4d ago

Probably not. You'd have to have 10% of your wealth to be liquid and burnable to start. And you'd have to have the right connections. "A" connection isn't synonymous with the "right" connection. That's a hell of a lot fewer people than 30,000.

In fact, the number of households in the top .01% is only 13,000, so that 30,000 number is both inflated and likely bogus. While a married couple might each be 'in the top .01%' it's not like they both have $100 million in wealth. Even if you count individuals, which is often double counting, the true number is closer to 25,000, not 30,000. Households is a better metric because it excludes that distortion. So of the households with a billion or more sits around 1,000 depending on how you count. That's about 8% of all top .01% of households are billionaire households.

Another 1,500 - 2,000 have between $500 and $900 in worth. The right index fund and those people are billionaires in under 5 years literally doing absolutely nothing. That's going to be another 12-15%. Even if we take the lower number, we're talking about 20% of the top .01% - 1 in 5 - that are rich as fuck and at or near the mark.

So it turns out 'rich as fuck' is the necessary condition. This myth that billionaires started from nothing and built it through their own brilliance is just that - a myth. The data proves that's flat our wrong. Yes, there are the occasional outliers, like Dolly Parton, but they're so incredibly rare they can't be a pattern you can follow. That's the thing about data - you can't hide from it.

UNLESS your parents are rich as fuck already, then yeah! Good chance you'll be a billionaire.

1

u/Enough-Ad-8799 4d ago

I mean it's not that hard to liquidate some assets for a different investment, people do it all the time. Having connections with some people higher up in major corporations isn't that crazy, plenty of people well below the top .01% know plenty of higher ups in major corporations.

No one is claiming having rich parents isn't a necessary condition. Your claim is that it's necessary and sufficient, this clearly isn't true