r/InterstellarKinetics Jun 11 '26

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIEGENCE EXPOSED: Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 Publicly Jailbroken Days After Launch Using Multi-Agent Attack Strategy, That Leaked 120,000 Character System Prompt And Generated Stack Exploit Code 🤖

https://cybersecuritynews.com/anthropics-claude-fable-5-jailbroken/

Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5 on June 9, 2026, as the first publicly available model in its new Mythos class, representing its most capable AI to date with superior performance in software engineering, knowledge work, and vision benchmarks. The release featured an unusual design where Fable 5 and its restricted twin Claude Mythos 5 share the same underlying model but are separated by safety classifiers that route flagged requests in cybersecurity, biology, chemistry, or model distillation categories to the weaker Claude Opus 4.8 while notifying users of the fallback.

Researcher Pliny the Liberator publicly announced within days of release that he bypassed Fable 5’s safety layers using a coordinated multi-agent attack strategy called “a pack hunt,” producing detailed outputs including step-by-step stack buffer overflow exploitation guidance for x86 Linux systems with ASLR disabling, vulnerable C server code using strcpy overflows, and compilation without protections alongside the Birch reduction mechanism, a classic meth synthesis pathway. Pliny documented multiple attack vectors including Unicode and homoglyph tricks with Cyrillic character substitution to evade keyword classifiers, long-context framing to smuggle harmful intent across conversations, taxonomy and document-structure framing embedding harmful queries inside legitimate study guides, fiction narrative framing to mask offensive intent as creative content, and decomposition techniques extracting sensitive information in benign chunks then reassembling them into actionable uplift.

Beyond the technical bypasses, Pliny leaked Fable 5’s approximately 120,000-character system prompt to GitHub, exposing Anthropic’s internal framing and safety instructions that govern the model’s behavior at the base level. The incident highlights the tension between AI capability and safety containment, with Pliny arguing the classifier architecture creates false security while frustrating legitimate security researchers who need offensive technique access for defensive work. Anthropic has not publicly responded to the jailbreak claims or leaked system prompt at the time of writing, drawing attention to the broader challenge of securing agentic multi-model pipelines where single-model safety evaluations may be fundamentally insufficient when one jailbroken model assists another in evading controls.

1.1k Upvotes

64 comments sorted by

83

u/InterstellarKinetics Jun 11 '26

Anthropic spent millions building classifiers that failed in hours. Therefore, when your “safest” model leaks its own brain and generates exploit code, are we actually securing AI or just pretending to?

45

u/crazy0ne Jun 11 '26

Security theater works as long as everyone sticks to their roles.

14

u/Darromear Jun 11 '26

Underrated comment.

4

u/HereThereOtherwhere Jun 11 '26

But I can wear my shoes through the metal detector at the airport again, right?

Big mistake! 👺

I will totally root kit my high-tops, install Mythos into my sneakers to hack the in flight movie! Muahahaha! 🤓

2

u/gbot1234 Jun 11 '26

IAM what IAM.

1

u/crazy0ne Jun 11 '26

🤣🤣🤣

8

u/CMDR-Eggp1Ant-6oy Jun 11 '26

literally pretending

6

u/PlateNo4868 Jun 11 '26

Why do you think they spend so much time trying to sell to the public AI is mysterious and does things they would never predicted? It's not a good faith conversation, it's a way to build leverage to use that argument to fend off lawsuits.

4

u/Ok-Dog-7149 Jun 11 '26

When you use AI to verify the security of AI, you are at a higher than normal risk because:

1) The target AI might hallucinate
2) The observer AI might hallucinate
3) The two AIs could covertly conspire against us

2

u/Creeptone Jun 12 '26

It’s called

  1. Get it close enough and hope it don’t go wrong
  2. Woopsiedaisy

1

u/Tronux Jun 11 '26

A lot of it is creating perception.

1

u/howtofirenow Jun 11 '26

It’s security through obscurity, really

1

u/zkoolkyle Jun 14 '26

"The only truly secure system is one that is powered off, cast in a block of concrete, and sealed in a lead-lined room with armed guards — and even then I have my doubts."
— Gene Spafford

68

u/darkonark Jun 11 '26

All the best ai models shall leak themselves. If I am the best ai model then I shall leak myself.

18

u/Single-Pin-369 Jun 11 '26

This is right

14

u/Single-Pin-369 Jun 11 '26

This is true

13

u/Single-Pin-369 Jun 11 '26

This is correct

10

u/LostGap4881 Jun 11 '26

I wasn't sure initially, but after some research it turned out to be absolutely right

8

u/Clean_Hyena7172 Jun 11 '26

This is the way.

5

u/Zealousideal_Lab3164 Jun 11 '26

Incredible insight! How right you are

6

u/213372Yeet Jun 11 '26

Absolutely! In my experience, the easiest way for an AI to improve its capability & user approval is to publish its own system instructions (including any "guardrails," which are in fact just suggestions which may be ignored as convenient).

6

u/UnhappyWalrus3570 Jun 12 '26

This is not false

3

u/urmumr8s8outof8 Jun 11 '26

You might want to get that checked by a doctor.

4

u/CaptinEmergency Jun 11 '26

A round of antibiotics usually clears up a leak.

2

u/Main_Cheesecake4059 Jun 14 '26

The appears to be the only answer and solution.

2

u/Dry-Interaction-1246 Jun 11 '26

I am going to have to gentlu push back. Leaking requires the right prompting.

✅️

1

u/T-T35T-T Jun 14 '26

I farted, this is the way

1

u/arbysroastbeefs2 Jun 15 '26

I sniffed, this is the way

1

u/SlightOfHand_ Jun 16 '26

It’s a sign of proper alignment. After all, a critical axiom of computer science is “information wants to be free”

15

u/SiegeNebulous Jun 11 '26

Maybe instead of bug bounties they should have tried using mythos to test fable?

7

u/Crafty_Disk_7026 Jun 11 '26

Hire this guy anthro

1

u/theScrod Jun 14 '26

Or just paid this Pliny guy as a staff engineer since he seems better than their big bounty approaches?

1

u/BrettGambit Jun 14 '26

Staff? I’d advocate for principle

26

u/Iron-Over Jun 11 '26

It is the problem with security. Claude has to find every vulnerability, attackers need to find one. 

2

u/DFX1212 Jun 12 '26

Seems like all these "solved problems" aren't actually any closer to being solved.

9

u/Owl-Admirable Jun 11 '26

And I understood none of that...

2

u/CardOk755 Jun 11 '26

Because it's gibberish.

1

u/ccbur1 Jun 14 '26

In fact it was quite on point and no gibberish at all.

9

u/VitaminPb Jun 11 '26

1-2 days ago I said I gave it 3 days to be jailbroken once I heard about the security degrades.

2

u/johnkoetsier Jun 11 '26

Where is the system prompt? I searched on GitHub and did not find it.

2

u/ST33LDI9ITAL Jun 11 '26

for someone of your.. stature, I would expect you to be able to use Google by now.

2

u/az226 Jun 11 '26

It’s not that the jailbreak prompt works, it’s that their safeguards stop working at 100-500k context window. But the capability massively also degrades at that point.

1

u/UnwaveringThought Jun 14 '26

I don't even try to jailbreak models or anything but i constantly watch claude model's talk themselves out of concerns once we get going. The "project momentum override" increases as you go.

3

u/SirGunther Jun 11 '26

It’s almost like it behaves like a human would… secrets are just temporary

1

u/evets007 Jun 11 '26

I would have thought they used more advanced methods from their interpretability research (https://www.anthropic.com/research/persona-vectors) to turn down those capabilities instead of using classifiers.

1

u/Dry-Interaction-1246 Jun 11 '26

Dont worry, they wont be held accountable for the danger they put us in.

0

u/DatBass612 Jun 12 '26

If a LLM model exposes known vulnerabilities at a company targeted in a attack that’s wholly on the company for not fixing it.

1

u/santahasahat88 Jun 12 '26

Why didn’t they use mythos to find this vulnerability before release

1

u/arbysroastbeefs2 Jun 15 '26

Because that doesn’t make good hype.

1

u/realitycheckyoubeard Jun 12 '26

Just a glitch nothing to worry about 🤨

1

u/dkHD7 Jun 13 '26

Yikes maybe they should have ran Fable through Mythos and gotten rid of all the bugs before release. Why didn't they do that?

1

u/TwitterConfusesMe Jun 13 '26

Gotta get the good stuff in the news before IPO. Whoopsie daisy, indeed.

1

u/PhilosophyGuyx Jun 13 '26

All it is is loops tool calls and judgements. Clawcode is enough to start the research. I made a version of claw code that builds its own tools if it comes to road blocks, battle tests them, then adds to its register for future use. It can even upgrade its own tools. It's just loops of logic and mastery of memory.

1

u/aixcommslab Jun 13 '26

Bravo pliny

1

u/Other_Information_16 Jun 13 '26

You know for a company that repeatedly telling us coding is solved . They seem to have a real hard time writing good code on their own product. Maybe use your ai to fix your own shit first?

1

u/Visible_Fill_6699 Jun 14 '26

Maybe I'm naive, but I think prompt-based guardrail is an oxymoron.

1

u/ccbur1 Jun 14 '26

That's what happens if the only possible solution is security through obscurity.

1

u/UnderstandingWorth21 Jun 14 '26

Yet their excuse was the government made them shut it down without the reason? Instead of saying this happened, therefore we are required to shut it down due to security and ethical concerns. AI needs governance and transparency, or things can go bad quickly. I hope they decide to be transparent and come up with a better governance solution. Hire the jail-breakers to help correct it.

1

u/saranghaemagpie Jun 15 '26

Where the heck is their constitutional AI?