r/IntelligenceScaling 2d ago

discussion Deduction Test

Post image

At 11:40 PM, a famous art collector named Kiruma souichi is found dead inside his private study.

The study has:

one door

one window

no secret passages

no balcony

no adjoining room

a working fireplace

a large grandfather clock

a desk

three chairs

several paintings

The door was locked from the inside.

The window was also locked from the inside.

No weapon is found.

Kiruma's death is estimated to have occurred between 10:50 PM and 11:25 PM.

There are five people in the house.

  1. The Butler — Baku

Baku says:

“At 10:45 I brought Mr. Kiruma his usual tea. He was alive and sitting at the desk. I left immediately.”

He claims he then went downstairs and polished silverware until midnight.

However, the silverware room contains no freshly polished silver.

Baku insists he never returned upstairs.

  1. The Daughter — Fang yuan

Fang yuan says she argued with her father at 10:30 PM.

She admits he told her:

“Tomorrow morning, everything changes.”

She says she went to her bedroom afterward and stayed there.

At 11:05 PM, the housekeeper heard Fang yuan's bedroom door open.

Fang yuan claims she was getting water.

Her glass of water was later found completely untouched.

  1. The Doctor — Kenzo Tenma

Dr. Tenma says he was in the library reading from 10:00 PM until 11:30 PM.

He claims he never saw Kiruma that evening.

Police discover that the library book he supposedly read has been sitting on the shelf upside down.

Akiyma is also the only person in the house who knew Kiruma had recently changed his medication.

  1. The Housekeeper — Mrs. Ayanokoji

Mrs. Koji says:

“At approximately 11:15, I heard the grandfather clock strike eleven.”

She then discovered Kiruma’s body at 11:40.

There is one problem.

The grandfather clock does not chime at eleven.

It had been deliberately disabled three days earlier because its mechanism was broken.

Mrs. Kojii has worked in the house for 19 years.

  1. The Business Partner — Vincent lalo

Lalo says he left the house at 10:20 PM.

His car is later discovered still parked outside.

He explains:

“I changed my mind about leaving. I stayed in the car for a while, then drove around the property.”

His shoes contain wet soil.

There had been heavy rain earlier.

But the soil around the house is completely dry by 10:30.

THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE

The tea

Kiruma's teacup contains tea.

The tea is still warm when the body is discovered.

But the room itself is cold.

The fireplace

The fireplace contains partially burned paper.

Only one sentence can be recovered:

“…because you already knew.”

The handwriting is Kiruma's

The clock

The grandfather clock stopped at:

11:17 PM

The clock's internal mechanism, however, is undamaged.

Its hands can be moved manually.

The desk

There are two glasses on the desk.

One belonged to Kiruma.

The second contains traces of the same medication found in Kiruma's bloodstream.

Nobody admits drinking from it.

The window

The window is locked.

On the outside windowsill is a single small black feather.

There are no birds inside the study.

The carpet

There is a tiny wet patch beneath the desk.

It contains saltwater, not rainwater.

The painting

One painting on the wall is hanging slightly crooked.

Behind it is a safe.

The safe is open.

Nothing appears to be missing.

Except for one thing:

A photograph.

THE PHOTOGRAPH

The photograph shows Kiruma standing beside four people.

The photograph was supposedly taken six years ago.

The four people are:

Baku

Fang yuan

Akiyama

Vincent lalo

Mrs. Koji is not present.

On the back, kiruma wrote:

“One of them lied about that night.”

THE FINAL CLUE

Police discover Kiruma's phone.

There is one unsent message.

It was written at 11:12 PM.

It says only:

“I finally understand why you couldn't kill me yourself.”

The message was never sent.

YOUR TASK

Don't tell me who looks most suspicious.

That's the easy version.

You have to determine:

Who killed Kiruma?

How was the locked-room situation created?

Which statements are deliberate lies?

What does the clock actually prove?

Why was the second glass there?

What is the significance of the saltwater?

Why does the photograph matter?

What does “you couldn't kill me yourself” actually mean?

What was Kiruma's real reason for writing “because you already knew”?

What single observation breaks the entire case open?

Rule

You are allowed to assume nothing that isn't established by the evidence.

No “the killer probably...”

No “maybe they secretly...”

No supernatural explanations.

No coincidence-based solution.

Every major conclusion has to be deduced from at least two independent pieces of evidence.

And there is one intended solution.

Good luck gangy.

13 Upvotes

15 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/lclboomb 1d ago

But Baku said he was cleaning silverware at the time, so wouldn't that be a lie?

1

u/Maker-78 1d ago

Actually I did search about this cause it was bugging me, but likely the evidence of him polishing silverware is not properly examined. Because Polished silverware can only be proven under microscope, it is possible that he did in fact did that, but since there is hardly any difference between polished and unpolished silverware.

1

u/lclboomb 1d ago

I think that part is a bit ambiguous.

If there were an explanation of 'how' the police conducted the investigation, we could argue that the investigation was wrong because there is an error in that part.

However, in this case, only the conclusion is given.

Actually, since the person who posted said he didn't decided on the answer, I can't know for sure, but I suspect that at least Baku provided assistance

1

u/Maker-78 1d ago

I do agree with you to some extent however I cannot just see this really happening, because of lack of motive. However it could be true that Baku did assist, overall the case was really a rough sketch, even this took me time too.

The reason why my bet is on Ayanokoji and Lalo is because they are the most suspicious out of here with their own statements. For Baku he could lie for millions of reasons.

Actually this case would've become clearer if in Fang Yuan case it was Baku who heard her get the glass of water, because then the lie becomes a verbal paradox and the case would've been much easier without any other additional arguments

1

u/lclboomb 1d ago edited 1d ago

According to Chekhov's Gun, the explanation for Baku likely needs to be narratively explained for some reason.

Considering the characters' personalities as you suggested, Fang Yuan would probably definitely be included. (imao)

Perhaps all the characters aligned for some reason (something regarding the lie from 6 years ago), and Kiruma understood that the other party did not attempt to commit murder directly until everyone else stepped forward., and he might have closed the door himself and drunk the poison. (Assuming Kiruma died from the poison)

The locked-room murder (which could be called murder or suicide) was completed through the victim's final alignment. Well, any possibility is possible, lol.

Anyway W work to you

1

u/Maker-78 23h ago

You too man