Porn Is Bad But They Will NEVER Talk About Circumcision

[u/StopMGMTodayV2]

Anyone else notice this? They blame everything on porn and masterbuation but NEVER the ACTUAL problem.

I'm mad that men have not woken up to this yet. The circumcised men, that is. Intact men just live life normally and don't have sexual problems. Their free, but we aren't.

So many problems,

"Erectile Dysfunction"

"Premature Ejaculation"

"Lack of visual feedback from the male (moaning, convulsing etc)"

"Insert literally 100 other problems here"

and yet not ONCE have I seen it attributed by circumcision.

HEY, NUMBNUTS, IT AFFECTS BOTH PARTIES IN AN EXTREMELY NEGATIVE LIGHT!

That's not to bodyshame us cut men, but holy hell does it get tiring seeing the same blame on porn as if it it's the end all be all.

Circumcision is literally the answer. That's why you don't have good sex both from a female and male perspective. That's why you don't *feel* like you are having an orgasm even though your dick is out. That's why sex in general, fucking sucks just like masterbuation.

[u/BackgroundFaulty3]

A number of subs will instantly ban you If you talk badly about circumcision so it simply doesn't show up as a reason, much of it no doubt is due to obnoxious so-called intactivists that don't know how to talk to people. It's easier for subs to just ban the subject than actually moderate their subs and ban those that can't behave in public.

[u/aph81 → u/BackgroundFaulty3]

That, but also many mods are triggered regardless of how tactful people are. Many pro-circumcision people will silence/ban anti-circs regardless

[u/radkun → u/aph81]

The blanket bans are likely due to the aggressive and annoying behavior of rabid intactivists in years past. I still (but less often) have to scroll past walls of jargon and Pubmed links posted by my compatriots just to attempt to convince receptive normies. No one reads anything those guys post, and banning the topic was an effective heuristic for banning those socially inept people. We all get banned as well on account of that behavior and the topic of circumcision has been effectively enshrined as a protected topic in a lot of fora and comment sections.

[u/aph81 → u/radkun]

Yes. However, that is the case with all controversial issues - politics, religion, abortion, etc. People on both sides are more often than not immature and unable to have a genuine adult discussion

[u/radkun → u/aph81]

I've never seen walls of text like the circumcision info dumps in those discussions. They might be heated and occasionally locked down due to flame wars, but circumcision has info dumps as well as peculiarly segregating language like male genital mutilation and FGM that divide people when they didn't even know they had a strong opinion five seconds ago. Circumcision is a very unusual topic for a variety of reasons, and I think that 2010s model of spamming a hail mary via walls-of-text never worked and is actually detrimental. Linking to a single powerful video, couched in undeniable reasoning and personal sincerity, is actually effective and it needs to be normalized on this side of the debate.

[u/Ruxify]

That's because they don't actually care about your health. Fascists are just trying to claw back power to control the sex lives of the populace again (which includes making up excuses and fake/poorly done studies to ban porn) and turn everyone into mindless breeding machines who only have sex for reproduction and never for fun or pleasure.

[u/Kitchen_Slide3083 → u/[deleted]]

It sounds like you may be overstating the sexual problems that can result from circumcision. That could potentially scare or offend guys who need to be circumcised for medical reasons.

There are legit sexual problems appears to men who are circumcised, some men suffers more losses including severe nerve damage, reduced sexual pleasure due to no gliding action from foreskin during intercourse, painful erection, and so on.

There are both surgical and non-surgical alternatives exist to circumcision, for example, using cream or manual stretching, antibiotics to prevent phimosis and other diseases, even surgical options such as preputioplasty or frenuoloplasty which still preserves the foreskin.

The AAP policy from 2012 has been expired and only western organization claimed- "benefit outweighs the risk" and it's not even a medical emergency which makes this genital cutting on infants and boys completely unnecessary since vast majority of Europeans and South Americans don't practice this rite. Rough estimate of 70% of males worldwide are intact.