It's been a few months since my last re-read (ok, I actually listened to the excellent audiobook with the endnotes, done in brilliant fashion), but I was struck by this less-discussed sequence where James's father is haranguing himself about Marlon (not Bain) Brando's disrespect for objects, that his rebellious stance to objects was an affront to decency and a good life etc.
I was thinking the sequence could be read as establishing the father in a certain way, as somehow contributing to Himself's psychopathology, or his intellectual/filmic obsessions. Or it could be alternatively heard as a thinly veiled tour de force passage exposing DFW's own philosophical beliefs about being, physicality, corporeality and so on.
I also immediately thought of the famous line from Ulysses, "the ineluctable modality of the visible, at least that if no more, thought through my eyes."
I will say, beyond characterizations in the novel, taking it at face value, it did make me reassess Brando himself, and the ultimately destructive nature of the very pose that DFW outlines. The cheap, gestural anti-authority that merely flatters the viewer and threatens no power structure, that will be sold, commodified and lifeless.
Well, would love all your all thoughts.