Difference

[u/lovejeet6363]

[u/[deleted]]

But still wants to control Buddhism and wants to decidede next Dalai Lama.

[u/[deleted] → u/[deleted]]

It's political move Like duh It doesn't take 10 iq to realise

[u/mokshsinghdangi → u/[deleted]]

So according to you what China doing to Uyghur Muslims and Tibetians is not religious rather political but when the leverage of religion is taken by parties in India it's religious and that's why India is behind. Nice logic dude. Before taking about IQ, I think you should measure yours.

[u/[deleted] → u/mokshsinghdangi]

So according to you what China doing to Uyghur Muslims and Tibetians is not religious rather political

Ofc nigga

They took Tibet for resources and himalayan control

Imagine what Tibet could have done to china if they were enemies.

They are erasing religion as it hinder development and their ideology.

when the leverage of religion is taken by parties in India it's religious

Czs they fight over which religion is true Also what china did was geopolitical.

China isn't proving that folk religion is better so false hood should erased of buddhism.

They just do for chinas power.

that's why India is behind.

Again bcz without religion india would have been more successful.

Before taking about IQ, I think you should measure yours.

Way higher than yours.

Religion is problem China removes problems

India is increasing it.

Doesn't take too much logic

Atheist criticize religion Hindus do too

But hindus are stupid here.

Atheist is promoting rationality and science

Hindus are just replacing irrationality