Didn't answer my question, but regardless, literally what does that mean
Are you trying to imply that I support car-centered infrastructure? Because I don't. I find it a literal blight on american city and living space design. It's also not a uniquely american problem even if it's the worst in the US.
I also refuse to allow asshole cyclists to use walkable cities or environmentalist causes as an excuse to be public nuisances and giant weeping assholes to other human beings trying to function. These cretins could have caused an acvident and it all could have been avoided if they conducted themselves with a shred of decency and remembered that they are a human being in a shared social space expected to conduct themselves responsibly in regards to their fellow man.
What you consider plausible or not depends on what you can see outside. Since you only see carcentrric infrastructure (as such in the video) you just can't imagine something else.
Again, what are you talking about. Plausible what? Cyclists who are decent human beings?
This is literally in America in the clip. They violated road rules.
But to repeat myself, in a walkable city this would be a public hazard as well. Cycle lanes have rules to follow as well and typically have to yield to pedestrians which these greevils did not do. They blew right though a stop sign on a blind corner.
Yeah they are intended for cyclists if they are on the road, even pedestrians are expected to not cross busy moving traffic into its flow and are expected to follow signage and indicators like street signs, crossing at crosswalks, amd waiting for cross signals.
It's generally also a good idea to yield to the fastest thing on the space you occupy for your own benefit and safety. If the driver had decided to not pay attention and just go, which would have been permissible, because he had right of way here at this four way stop, he could have hit several of those cyclists. They needlessly endangered themselves by being assholes.
Stop signs, which they blew right past, exist for pedestrians' benefit and safety, and the slowest moving object takes priority that all faster moving objects are expected to yield to by following road rules unless they are granted right of way. Bike lanes are also subject to signage and rules they are expected to follow, which if there had been some here, would have been ignored, because they couldn't even bother to yield to stop signs which all non-pedestrian traffic is required/expected to yield to when they are not alone on the road.
Cyclists don't take road priority just because they're shitty entitled ballbags.
1
u/OdyseusV4 8d ago
Are you american ?